Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berry, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Horowitz, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berry, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Horowitz, M. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 20, Issue 3 (February), 2002: 743-750
© 2002 American Society for Clinical Oncology

High-Dose Versus Standard Chemotherapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Comparison of Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trials With Data From the Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry

By Donald A. Berry, Gloria Broadwater, John P. Klein, Karen Antman, Joseph Aisner, Jacob Bitran, Mary Costanza, Cesar O. Freytes, Edward Stadtmauer, Robert Peter Gale, I. Craig Henderson, Hillard M. Lazarus, Philip L. McCarthy, Jr, Larry Norton, Howard Parnes, Andrew Pecora, Michael C. Perry, Philip Rowlings, Gary Spitzer, Mary M. Horowitz

From the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, and University of Texas, Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry, Milwaukee, and Health Policy Institute, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI; Columbia University, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, and Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, and Progenitor Cell Therapy LLC, Saddle Brook, NJ; Cancer and Leukemia Group B, Chicago, and Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, IL; University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Boston, MA; University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; University of Missouri/Ellis Fischel Cancer Center, Columbia, MO; Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; and Cancer Center of the Carolinas, Greenville, SC.

Address reprint requests to Donald A. Berry, PhD, Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Box 447, Houston, TX 77030-4009; email: dberry{at}odin.mdacc.tmc.edu

PURPOSE: To assess survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) versus standard-dose chemotherapy (SDC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS: SDC in four Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) trials was compared with hematopoietic stem-cell support in patients from the Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry. Cox proportional hazard regression incorporated potentially confounding effects. A total of 1,509 women were enrolled onto CALGB trials, and 1,188 women received HDC. No significant survival differences existed by CALGB trial or HDC regimen. Consideration was restricted to candidates for both SDC and HDC. The resulting sample included 635 SDC and 441 HDC patients. The outcome of interest was overall survival.

RESULTS: The HDC group displayed better performance status. The SDC group had slightly better survival in first year after treatment. The HDC group had lower hazard of death from years 1 to 4 and had somewhat higher probability of 5-year survival (adjusted probabilities [95% confidence intervals], 23% [17% to 29%] v 15% [11% to 19%], P = .03).

CONCLUSION: After controlling for known prognostic factors in this nonrandomized analysis of two large independent data sets, women receiving HDC versus SDC for metastatic breast cancer have a similar short-term probability of survival, and might have a modestly higher long-term probability of survival.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
E. A. Stadtmauer
A Dramatic Story of Hope and Reality
J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2008; 26(1): 11 - 12.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Crump, S. Gluck, D. Tu, D. Stewart, M. Levine, P. Kirkbride, J. Dancey, S. O'Reilly, T. Shore, S. Couban, et al.
Randomized Trial of High-Dose Chemotherapy With Autologous Peripheral-Blood Stem-Cell Support Compared With Standard-Dose Chemotherapy in Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer: NCIC MA.16
J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2008; 26(1): 37 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
N. Kroger, M. Frick, O. Gluz, S. Mohrmann, B. Metzner, C. Jackisch, Y. Ko, H.-W. Lindemann, C. R. Meier, H. P. Lohrmann, et al.
Randomized Trial of Single Compared With Tandem High-Dose Chemotherapy Followed by Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation in Patients With Chemotherapy-Sensitive Metastatic Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2006; 24(24): 3919 - 3926.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
L. Norton
Conceptual and Practical Implications of Breast Tissue Geometry: Toward a More Effective, Less Toxic Therapy
Oncologist, June 1, 2005; 10(6): 370 - 381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
R. W. Childs
Evolving trends in hematopoietic cell transplantation for solid tumors: tempering enthusiasm with clinical reality
Ann. Onc., April 1, 2004; 15(4): 543 - 544.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. J.M. van der Hoeven, N. C. Krak, O. S. Hoekstra, E. F.I. Comans, R. P.A. Boom, D. van Geldere, S. Meijer, E. van der Wall, J. Buter, H. M. Pinedo, et al.
18F-2-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography in Staging of Locally Advanced Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2004; 22(7): 1253 - 1259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
H.L. Parnes, C. Cirrincione, J. Aisner, D.A. Berry, S.L. Allen, J. Abrams, E. Chuang, M.R. Cooper, M.C. Perry, D.B. Duggan, et al.
Phase III Study of Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, and Fluorouracil (CAF) Plus Leucovorin Versus CAF for Metastatic Breast Cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9140
J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2003; 21(9): 1819 - 1824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
L. Gianni
High-dose chemotherapy for breast cancer: any use for it?
Ann. Onc., May 1, 2002; 13(5): 650 - 652.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online