Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 20, Issue 4
(February), 2002: 937-940
© 2002 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Phase II Trial of Weekly Paclitaxel in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Urothelial Cancer
By David J. Vaughn,
Catherine M. Broome,
Maha Hussain,
John C. Gutheil,
Avi B. Markowitz
From the University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Northern Virginia Oncology Group, Fairfax, VA; Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, San Diego, CA; and St Joseph Regional Cancer Center, Bryan, TX.
Address reprint requests to David J. Vaughn, MD, University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center, 3400 Spruce St, 16 Penn Tower, Philadelphia, PA 19104; email: djv{at}mail.med.upenn.edu
PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of weekly paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced urothelial cancer.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with urothelial cancer who had received one prior systemic chemotherapy regimen for advanced disease and had evidence of disease progression were eligible for enrollment. Patients received paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 by 1-hour intravenous infusion weekly. A cycle of therapy consisted of four weekly treatments.
RESULTS: The study enrolled 31 patients. Mean age was 66 years, and 45% of patients had three or more involved metastatic sites. Only 26% of patients had responded to prior chemotherapy. The median number of cycles delivered was three (range, one to eight) at a mean weekly paclitaxel dose of 79 mg/m2. Three patients achieved a partial response (10%; 95% confidence interval, 0% to 20%). Median time to progression was 2.2 months, and median overall survival time was 7.2 months. Therapy was well tolerated with minimal hematologic toxicity. Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicities were also uncommon.
CONCLUSION: Although the overall response rate to weekly paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced urothelial cancer was modest, the chemotherapy-refractory nature of the study population should be considered.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Sonpavde, A. A. Elfiky, and J. E. Rosenberg
Review: Novel agents for advanced bladder cancer
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology,
July 1, 2009;
1(1):
37 - 50.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Suyama, T. Ueda, S. Fukasawa, Y. Imamura, K. Nakamura, K. Miyasaka, T. Sazuka, K.-i. Egoshi, N. Nihei, M. Hamano, et al.
Combination of Gemcitabine and Paclitaxel as Second-line Chemotherapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 1, 2009;
39(4):
244 - 250.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Akaza, S. Naito, M. Usami, T. Miki, N. Miyanaga, H. Taniai, and and the Japanese Gemcitabine Study Group
Efficacy and Safety of Gemcitabine Monotherapy in Patients with Transitional Cell Carcinoma after Cisplatin-Containing Therapy: A Japanese Experience
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 23, 2007;
(2007)
hym011v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Garcia and R. Dreicer
Systemic Chemotherapy for Advanced Bladder Cancer: Update and Controversies
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 10, 2006;
24(35):
5545 - 5551.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. J. Sweeney, B. J. Roth, F. F. Kabbinavar, D. J. Vaughn, M. Arning, R. E. Curiel, C. K. Obasaju, Y. Wang, S. J. Nicol, and D. S. Kaufman
Phase II Study of Pemetrexed for Second-Line Treatment of Transitional Cell Cancer of the Urothelium
J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 20, 2006;
24(21):
3451 - 3457.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. D. Galsky
The Role of Taxanes in the Management of Bladder Cancer
Oncologist,
November 1, 2005;
10(10):
792 - 798.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|