Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leighl, N. B.
Right arrow Articles by Goodwin, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leighl, N. B.
Right arrow Articles by Goodwin, P. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 20, Issue 5 (March), 2002: 1344-1352
© 2002 American Society for Clinical Oncology

Economic Analysis of the TAX 317 Trial: Docetaxel Versus Best Supportive Care as Second-Line Therapy of Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

By Natasha B. Leighl, Frances A. Shepherd, Rita Kwong, Ronald L. Burkes, Ronald Feld, Pamela J. Goodwin

From the Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital/University Health Network, and Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Address reprint requests to Natasha Leighl, MD, Princess Margaret Hospital, 5-222, 610 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2M9; email: Natasha.Leighl{at}uhn.on.ca

PURPOSE: To determine the cost-effectiveness (CE) of second-line docetaxel compared with best supportive care (BSC) in the TAX 317 trial, a randomized clinical trial of second-line chemotherapy in non–small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS: A retrospective CE analysis of the TAX 317 trial was undertaken, evaluating direct medical costs of therapy from the viewpoint of Canada’s public health care system. Costs were derived in 1999 Canadian dollars, and resource use was determined through prospective trial data.

RESULTS: The incremental survival benefit in the docetaxel arm over BSC was 2 months (P = .047). The CE of docetaxel was $57,749 per year of life gained. For patients treated with docetaxel 75 mg/m2, the CE was $31,776 per year of life gained. In univariate sensitivity analyses, CE estimates were most sensitive to changes in survival, ranging from $18,374 to $117,434 with 20% variation in survival at the recommended dose. The largest cost center in both arms was hospitalization, followed by the cost of drugs, investigations, radiotherapy, and community care. BSC patients had fewer hospitalizations than patients in the chemotherapy arm and were more often palliated at home.

CONCLUSION: Although the decision to treat should not be based on economic considerations alone, our CE estimate of $31,776 per year of life gained (at the currently recommended dose of docetaxel) is within an acceptable range of health care expenditures, and the total costs of therapy are similar to those of second-line palliative chemotherapy for other solid tumors.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
N. I. Cherny, A. P. Abernethy, F. Strasser, R. Sapir, D. Currow, and S. Y. Zafar
Improving the Methodologic and Ethical Validity of Best Supportive Care Studies in Oncology: Lessons From a Systematic Review
J. Clin. Oncol., November 10, 2009; 27(32): 5476 - 5486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R. Ng, B. Hasan, N. Mittmann, M. Florescu, F. A. Shepherd, K. Ding, C. A. Butts, Y. Cormier, G. Darling, G. D. Goss, et al.
Economic Analysis of NCIC CTG JBR.10: A Randomized Trial of Adjuvant Vinorelbine Plus Cisplatin Compared With Observation in Early Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer--A Report of the Working Group on Economic Analysis, and the Lung Disease Site Group, National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group
J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2007; 25(16): 2256 - 2261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
D. R. Gandara and A. M. Davies
Oral Second-Line Chemotherapy for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The Bottom Line
J. Clin. Oncol., June 20, 2006; 24(18): 2700 - 2701.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
L Maslove, N Gower, S Spiro, R Rudd, R Stephens, and P West
Estimation of the additional costs of chemotherapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer
Thorax, July 1, 2005; 60(7): 564 - 569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
D. G. Fryback and B. M. Craig
Measuring Economic Outcomes of Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2004; 2004(33): 134 - 141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online