This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Save to my personal folders Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wong, J. H. Articles by Tauchi-Nishi, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wong, J. H. Articles by Tauchi-Nishi, P. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

Volume of Lymphatic Metastases Does Not Independently Influence Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer

From the Departments of Surgery and Pathology, University of Hawaii School of Medicine, Honolulu, HI; and Department of Surgery, Harbor–University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Torrance, CA.

Address reprint requests to Jan H. Wong, MD, Department of Surgery, 1356 Lusitana St, 6th Floor, Honolulu, HI 96813; email: wongj{at}hawaii.edu

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic relevance of the volume of nodal metastatic disease in colorectal cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred node-positive patients with T2 or T3 carcinoma of the colon or rectum after routine histologic examination of the regional nodes were studied. The metastatic tumor was measured with an ocular micrometer, and the tumor volume was determined.

RESULTS: The mean lymph node metastatic tumor volume was 5.1 ± 4.99 mm³ (range, 0.05 to 83,434 mm³). There was only a weak positive correlation with number of nodes involved with metastatic disease and tumor volume in nodes (r = .45). Median follow-up was 39 months (range, 1 to 87 months). The number of nodes was highly predictive of outcome. Individuals with one to three positive nodes had a substantially better survival than individuals with four or more positive nodes (P < .001). The volume of nodal metastatic disease correlated with outcome (P = .019). Patients dying as a result of disease had substantially greater mean metastatic nodal volume than those who were alive (3,705 v 1,783 mm³; P = .036). However, the total metastatic nodal volume did not, independent of positive nodes or number of positive nodes, predict outcome. Individuals with micrometastatic nodal volume did not have improved survival when compared with individuals with macrometastatic nodal volume (P = .79).

CONCLUSION: The number of nodes involved with metastatic tumor, rather the volume of metastatic involvement of the regional lymph nodes, predicts outcome. These results suggest that micrometastatic disease may have a similar prognosis as macrometastatic disease when the same number of lymph nodes are involved with metastatic tumor.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. R. Turner, C. Li, and C. C. Compton Newer Pathologic Assessment Techniques for Colorectal Carcinoma Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2007; 13(22): 6871s - 6876s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C Mescoli, M Rugge, S Pucciarelli, V M Russo, G Pennelli, M Guido, and D Nitti High prevalence of isolated tumour cells in regional lymph nodes from pN0 colorectal cancer J. Clin. Pathol., August 1, 2006; 59(8): 870 - 874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Yamamoto, Y. Tomita, Y. Hoshida, M. Sakon, M. Kameyama, S. Imaoka, M. Sekimoto, S. Nakamori, M. Monden, and K. Aozasa Expression of Valosin-Containing Protein in Colorectal Carcinomas as a Predictor for Disease Recurrence and Prognosis Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2004; 10(2): 651 - 657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]