Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nagtegaal, I. D.
Right arrow Articles by van Krieken, J. H. J.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nagtegaal, I. D.
Right arrow Articles by van Krieken, J. H. J.M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 20, Issue 7 (April), 2002: 1729-1734
© 2002 American Society for Clinical Oncology

Macroscopic Evaluation of Rectal Cancer Resection Specimen: Clinical Significance of the Pathologist in Quality Control

By Iris D. Nagtegaal, Cornelis J.H. van de Velde, Erik van der Worp, Ellen Kapiteijn, Phil Quirke, J. Han J.M. van Krieken and the Pathology Review Committee for the Cooperative Clinical Investigators of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group

From the Departments of Pathology and Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, and Department of Pathology, University Medical Center St Radboud, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; and Department of Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.

Address reprint requests to Iris D. Nagtegaal, MD, Department of Pathology, University Medical Center St Radboud, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands; email: i.nagtegaal{at}pathol.azn.nl

PURPOSE: Quality assessment and assurance are important issues in modern health care. For the evaluation of surgical procedures, there are indirect parameters such as complication, recurrence, and survival rates. These parameters are of limited value for the individual surgeon, and there is an obvious need for direct parameters. We have evaluated criteria by which pathologists can judge the quality or completeness of the resection specimen in a randomized trial for rectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: The pathology reports of all patients entered onto a Dutch multicenter randomized trial were reviewed. All participating pathologists had been instructed by workshops and videos in order to obtain standardized pathology work-up. A three-tiered classification was applied to assess completeness of the total mesorectal excision (TME). Prognostic value of this classification was tested using log-rank analysis of Kaplan-Meier survival curves using the data of all patients who did not receive any adjuvant treatment.

RESULTS: Included were 180 patients. In 24% (n = 43), the mesorectum was incomplete. Patients in this group had an increased risk for local and distant recurrence, 36.1% v 20.3% recurrence in the group with a complete mesorectum (P = .02). Follow-up is too short to observe an effect on survival rates.

CONCLUSION: A patient’s prognosis is predicted by applying a classification of macroscopic completeness on a rectal resection specimen. We conclude that pathologists are able to judge the quality of TME for rectal cancer. With this direct interdisciplinary assessment instrument, we establish a new role of the pathologist in quality control.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
M. Kusters, V. Valentini, F. A. Calvo, R. Krempien, G. A. Nieuwenhuijzen, H. Martijn, G. B. Doglietto, E. del Valle, F. Roeder, M. W. Buchler, et al.
Results of European pooled analysis of IORT-containing multimodality treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer: adjuvant chemotherapy prevents local recurrence rather than distant metastases
Ann. Onc., November 4, 2009; (2009) mdp501v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
I. D. Nagtegaal and P. Quirke
What Is the Role for the Circumferential Margin in the Modern Treatment of Rectal Cancer?
J. Clin. Oncol., January 10, 2008; 26(2): 303 - 312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
J. R Parfitt and D. K Driman
The total mesorectal excision specimen for rectal cancer: a review of its pathological assessment
J. Clin. Pathol., August 1, 2007; 60(8): 849 - 855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
I. D. Nagtegaal, M. J.E.M. Gosens, C. A.M. Marijnen, H. J. Rutten, C. J.H. van de Velde, and J. H. J.M. van Krieken
Combinations of Tumor and Treatment Parameters Are More Discriminative for Prognosis Than the Present TNM System in Rectal Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2007; 25(13): 1647 - 1650.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
MERCURY Study Group
Extramural Depth of Tumor Invasion at Thin-Section MR in Patients with Rectal Cancer: Results of the MERCURY Study
Radiology, April 1, 2007; 243(1): 132 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
E. C. de Bruin, C. J.H. van de Velde, S. van de Pas, I. D. Nagtegaal, J. H. J.M. van Krieken, M. J.E.M. Gosens, L. T.C. Peltenburg, J. P. Medema, and C. A.M. Marijnen
Prognostic value of apoptosis in rectal cancer patients of the dutch total mesorectal excision trial: radiotherapy is redundant in intrinsically high-apoptotic tumors.
Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2006; 12(21): 6432 - 6436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
MERCURY Study Group
Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in predicting curative resection of rectal cancer: prospective observational study
BMJ, October 14, 2006; 333(7572): 779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. R. Smalley, J. K. Benedetti, S. K. Williamson, J. M. Robertson, N. C. Estes, T. Maher, B. Fisher, T. A. Rich, J. A. Martenson, J. W. Kugler, et al.
Phase III Trial of Fluorouracil-Based Chemotherapy Regimens Plus Radiotherapy in Postoperative Adjuvant Rectal Cancer: GI INT 0144
J. Clin. Oncol., August 1, 2006; 24(22): 3542 - 3547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
I. D. Nagtegaal, C. J.H. van de Velde, C. A.M. Marijnen, J. H.J.M. van Krieken, and P. Quirke
Low Rectal Cancer: A Call for a Change of Approach in Abdominoperineal Resection
J. Clin. Oncol., December 20, 2005; 23(36): 9257 - 9264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Simunovic, A. Gafni, and M. Levine
In Reply:
J. Clin. Oncol., May 20, 2005; 23(15): 3633 - 3634.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
P. C. Shellito, J. W. Clark, C. G. Willett, and A. P. Caplan
Case 18-2004 - A 61-Year-Old Man with Rectal Bleeding and a 2-cm Mass in the Rectum
N. Engl. J. Med., June 10, 2004; 350(24): 2500 - 2509.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Simunovic, A. Gafni, and M. Levine
Economics of Preoperative Radiotherapy With Total Mesorectal Excision: What Can We Learn From the Dutch Experience?
J. Clin. Oncol., January 15, 2004; 22(2): 217 - 219.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br Med BullHome page
N J Maughan and P Quirke
Pathology - a molecular prognostic approach: Advances in colorectal cancer
Br. Med. Bull., December 1, 2002; 64(1): 59 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. A. Rodriguez-Bigas
Pathologic Evaluation of Total Mesorectal Excision: Big Brother Is Watching
J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2002; 20(7): 1714 - 1715.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online