Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rini, B. I.
Right arrow Articles by Small, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rini, B. I.
Right arrow Articles by Small, E. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 21, Issue 1 (January), 2003: 99-105
© 2003 American Society for Clinical Oncology

Prostate-Specific Antigen Kinetics as a Measure of the Biologic Effect of Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor in Patients With Serologic Progression of Prostate Cancer

Brian I. Rini, Vivian Weinberg, Robert Bok, Eric J. Small

From The University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA.

Address reprint requests to Brian I. Rini, MD, UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1600 Divisadero, 3rd floor, San Francisco, CA 94115; email: brini{at}medicine.ucsf.edu.

Purpose: To determine the biologic effect of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (sangramostim, GM-CSF; Immunex Corporation, Seattle, WA) as measured by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics in patients with serologic progression of prostate cancer after definitive local therapy.

Patients and Methods: Patients with prostate cancer who had undergone previous definitive surgical or radiation therapy with nonmetastatic, recurrent disease as manifested by a rising PSA between 0.4 ng/mL and 6.0 ng/mL were enrolled on this phase II trial. Patients received 250 µg/m2/day of subcutaneous GM-CSF on days 1 through 14 of a 28-day cycle. PSA was measured at day 1 of each cycle.

Results: Thirty patients with serologic progression of prostate cancer were treated. The median pretreatment PSA was 2.9 ng/mL. Of the 29 evaluable patients, three patients (10%; 95% confidence interval, 2% to 27%) achieved a 50% reduction in PSA. For the patients (n = 26) in whom the on-treatment PSA doubling time could be calculated, the median PSA doubling time increased from 8.4 months to 15 months (P = .001), and the median slope of the PSA versus time curve decreased with treatment (P = .004). Therapy was well tolerated by all patients, with an average treatment duration of 16.5 cycles (range, 5 to 33).

Conclusion: GM-CSF has a biologic effect in patients with serologic progression of prostate cancer after definitive local therapy, as measured by PSA declines and modulation of PSA kinetics.

Supported in part by the Immunex Corporation, Seattle, WA, CaPCURE, and the UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center (P30CA82103).

Presented in part at the American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting, May 2001.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
L. Fong, S. S. Kwek, S. O'Brien, B. Kavanagh, D. G. McNeel, V. Weinberg, A. M. Lin, J. Rosenberg, C. J. Ryan, B. I. Rini, et al.
Potentiating Endogenous Antitumor Immunity to Prostate Cancer through Combination Immunotherapy with CTLA4 Blockade and GM-CSF
Cancer Res., January 15, 2009; 69(2): 609 - 615.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. A. Garcia, E. A. Klein, C. Magi-Galluzzi, P. Elson, P. Triozzi, and R. Dreicer
Clinical and Biological Effects of Neoadjuvant Sargramostim and Thalidomide in Patients with Locally Advanced Prostate Carcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2008; 14(10): 3052 - 3059.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
E. K. Waller
The Role of Sargramostim (rhGM-CSF) as Immunotherapy
Oncologist, October 1, 2007; 12(suppl_2): 22 - 26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. J. Pantuck, J. T. Leppert, N. Zomorodian, W. Aronson, J. Hong, R. J. Barnard, N. Seeram, H. Liker, H. Wang, R. Elashoff, et al.
Phase II Study of Pomegranate Juice for Men with Rising Prostate-Specific Antigen following Surgery or Radiation for Prostate Cancer.
Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2006; 12(13): 4018 - 4026.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. W. Simons, M. A. Carducci, B. Mikhak, M. Lim, B. Biedrzycki, F. Borellini, S. M. Clift, K. M. Hege, D. G. Ando, S. Piantadosi, et al.
Phase I/II Trial of an Allogeneic Cellular Immunotherapy in Hormone-Naive Prostate Cancer.
Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2006; 12(11): 3394 - 3401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
W. S. Webster, E. J. Small, B. I. Rini, and E. D. Kwon
Prostate Cancer Immunology: Biology, Therapeutics, and Challenges
J. Clin. Oncol., November 10, 2005; 23(32): 8262 - 8269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online