Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 21, Issue 10
(May), 2003: 1904-1911
© 2003 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Phase III Trial Comparing Whole-Pelvic Versus Prostate-Only Radiotherapy and Neoadjuvant Versus Adjuvant Combined Androgen Suppression: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9413
M. Roach, III,
M. DeSilvio,
C. Lawton,
V. Uhl,
M. Machtay,
M.J. Seider,
M. Rotman,
C. Jones,
S.O. Asbell,
R.K. Valicenti,
S. Han,
C.R. Thomas, Jr,
W.S. Shipley
From the University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, and Radiology Associates of Sacramento, Sacramento, CA; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Statistical Headquarters, University of Pennsylvania, Albert Einstein Medical Center, and Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI; Akron City Hospital, Akron, OH; State University of New York Health Science Center at Brooklyn, Brooklyn, NY; Wayne State University, Detroit, MI; University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Address reprint requests to Mack Roach III, MD, University of California San Francisco, 1600 Divisadero St, Suite H1031, San Francisco, CA 94143-1708; email: roach{at}radonc17.ucsf.edu.
Purpose: This trial tested the hypothesis that combined androgen suppression (CAS) and whole-pelvic (WP) radiotherapy (RT) followed by a boost to the prostate improves progression-free survival (PFS) by 10% compared with CAS and prostate-only (PO) RT. This trial also tested the hypothesis that neoadjuvant and concurrent hormonal therapy (NCHT) improves PFS compared with adjuvant hormonal therapy (AHT) by 10%.
Materials and Methods: Eligibility included localized prostate cancer with an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 100 ng/mL and an estimated risk of lymph node (LN) involvement of 15%. Between April 1, 1995, and June 1, 1999, 1,323 patients were accrued. Patients were randomly assigned to WP + NCHT, PO + NCHT, WP + AHT, or PO + AHT. Failure for PFS was defined as the first occurrence of local, regional, or distant disease; PSA failure; or death for any cause.
Results: With a median follow-up of 59.5 months, WP RT was associated with a 4-year PFS of 54% compared with 47% in patients treated with PO RT (P = .022). Patients treated with NCHT experienced a 4-year PFS of 52% versus 49% for AHT (P = .56). When comparing all four arms, there was a progression-free difference among WP RT + NCHT, PO RT + NCHT, WP RT + AHT, and PO RT + AHT (60% v 44% v 49% v 50%, respectively; P = .008). No survival advantage has yet been seen.
Conclusion: WP RT + NCHT improves PFS compared with PO RT and NCHT or PO RT and AHT, and compared with WP RT + AHT in patients with a risk of LN involvement of 15%.
Supported by grants RTOG U10 CA21661, CCOP U10 CA37422, and Stat U10 CA32115 from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD.
The contents of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Cancer Institute.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
Related Correspondence
- Uncertainties Regarding Pelvic Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer
Ronald D. Ennis
JCO 2004 22: 2254-2255
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. L. Korn, B. Freidlin, and M. Mooney
Stopping or Reporting Early for Positive Results in Randomized Clinical Trials: The National Cancer Institute Cooperative Group Experience From 1990 to 2005
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 1, 2009;
27(10):
1712 - 1721.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Roach III
Targeting Pelvic Lymph Nodes in Men With Intermediate- and High-Risk Prostate Cancer, and Confusion About the Results of the Randomized Trials
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 1, 2008;
26(22):
3816 - 3817.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. L. Nguyen and A. V. D'Amico
In Reply
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 1, 2008;
26(22):
3817 - 3818.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. J. Sanfilippo, S. S. Taneja, A. Chachoua, H. Lepor, and S. C. Formenti
Phase I/II Study of Biweekly Paclitaxel and Radiation in Androgen-Ablated Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 20, 2008;
26(18):
2973 - 2978.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. L. Nguyen and A. V. D'Amico
Targeting Pelvic Lymph Nodes in Men With Intermediate- and High-Risk Prostate Cancer Despite Two Negative Randomized Trials
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 20, 2008;
26(12):
2055 - 2056.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Pommier and S. Chabaud
In Reply
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 20, 2008;
26(12):
2056 - 2057.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Pommier, S. Chabaud, J. L. Lagrange, P. Richaud, F. Lesaunier, E. Le Prise, J. P. Wagner, M. H. Hay, V. Beckendorf, J. P. Suchaud, et al.
Is There a Role for Pelvic Irradiation in Localized Prostate Adenocarcinoma? Preliminary Results of GETUG-01
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 1, 2007;
25(34):
5366 - 5373.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Roach III
Regarding the Influence of Adjuvant Suppression Therapy for Prostate Cancer on the Frequency and Timing of Fatal Myocardial Infarction: How Real Is the Risk?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
November 20, 2007;
25(33):
5325 - 5326.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. S. Antonarakis, A. L. Blackford, E. Garrett-Mayer, and M. A. Eisenberger
Survival in Men With Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer Treated With Hormone Therapy: A Quantitative Systematic Review
J. Clin. Oncol.,
November 1, 2007;
25(31):
4998 - 5008.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. G. Haddock, J. A. Sloan, J. W. Bollinger, G. Soori, P. D. Steen, and J. A. Martenson
Patient Assessment of Bowel Function During and After Pelvic Radiotherapy: Results of a Prospective Phase III North Central Cancer Treatment Group Clinical Trial
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 1, 2007;
25(10):
1255 - 1259.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Speight and M. Roach III
Advances in the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer: The Role of Anatomic and Functional Imaging in Men Managed With Radiotherapy
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 10, 2007;
25(8):
987 - 995.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Speight and M. Roach III
Radiotherapy in the Management of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Evolving Standards, Consensus, Controversies and New Directions
J. Clin. Oncol.,
November 10, 2005;
23(32):
8176 - 8185.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. B. Hayes and A. Pollack
Parameters for Treatment Decisions for Salvage Radiation Therapy
J. Clin. Oncol.,
November 10, 2005;
23(32):
8204 - 8211.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Kadoch, A. V. D'Amico, and R. H. Matthews
When Prostate Brachytherapy Fails: A Case Report and Discussion
Oncologist,
November 1, 2005;
10(10):
799 - 805.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Zapatero, F. Valcarcel, F. A. Calvo, R. Algas, A. Bejar, J. Maldonado, and S. Villa
Risk-Adapted Androgen Deprivation and Escalated Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: Does Radiation Dose Influence Outcome of Patients Treated With Adjuvant Androgen Deprivation? A GICOR Study
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 20, 2005;
23(27):
6561 - 6568.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. V. D'Amico, A. A. Renshaw, B. Sussman, and M.-H. Chen
Pretreatment PSA Velocity and Risk of Death From Prostate Cancer Following External Beam Radiation Therapy
JAMA,
July 27, 2005;
294(4):
440 - 447.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. M. Pisansky
External Beam Radiotherapy as Curative Treatment of Prostate Cancer
Mayo Clin. Proc.,
July 1, 2005;
80(7):
883 - 898.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. V. D'Amico, J. Manola, M. Loffredo, A. A. Renshaw, A. DellaCroce, and P. W. Kantoff
6-Month Androgen Suppression Plus Radiation Therapy vs Radiation Therapy Alone for Patients With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial
JAMA,
August 18, 2004;
292(7):
821 - 827.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. L. DeWeese
Radiation Therapy and Androgen Suppression as Treatment for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: The New Standard?
JAMA,
August 18, 2004;
292(7):
864 - 866.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Roach III
In Reply:
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 1, 2004;
22(11):
2255 - 2257.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Pollack
A Call for More With a Desire for Less: Pelvic Radiotherapy With Androgen Deprivation in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 15, 2003;
21(10):
1899 - 1901.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|