Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 21, Issue 10
(May), 2003: 1996-2003
© 2003 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Combination of Fludarabine and Mitoxantrone in Untreated Stages III and IV Low-Grade Lymphoma: S9501
William S. Velasquez,
Danika Lew,
Thomas M. Grogan,
C. Harris Spiridonidis,
Stanley P. Balcerzak,
Shaker R. Dakhil,
Thomas P. Miller,
Keith S. Lanier,
Robert A. Chapman,
Richard I. Fisher
From the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX; Southwest Oncology Group Statistical Center, Seattle, WA; University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Columbus Community Clinical Oncology Program, Ohio State University Health Center, Columbus, OH; Wichita Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita, KS; Columbia River Community Clinical Oncology Program, Portland, OR; Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI; and University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY.
Address reprint requests to Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG-9501), Operations Office, 14980 Omicron Dr, San Antonio, TX 77074; email: william.velasquez{at}usoncology.com.
Purpose: To determine the efficacy of combination fludarabine and mitoxantrone (FN) in untreated stages III and IV low-grade lymphoma. The major end point was to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) in all eligible patients.
Patients and Methods: Seventy-eight eligible patients were registered. Chemotherapy courses were administered every 4 weeks with mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 on day 1 and fludarabine 25 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, and 3 for a total of six to eight cycles. Pneumocystis carinii prophylaxis was required.
Results: Seventy-three patients (94%) attained an objective response. Complete remission was demonstrated in 34 patients (44%) and partial remission was demonstrated in 39 patients (50%). With a median follow-up time of 5.5 years, the median PFS was 32 months, with a 4-year PFS rate of 38%. Median survival has not been reached and 88% of all patients are alive at 4 years. The application of the International Prognostic Index and serologic staging showed significant differences in PFS in all risk groups, whereas overall survival was markedly worse for the highest-risk group in either prognostic model. Three prior Southwest Oncology Group trials using a regimen of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone or a combination of prednisone, vincristine, methotrexate, cytarabine, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, nitrogen mustard, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone in similar patient populations demonstrated comparable clinical outcome, although the 4-year survival for FN was better. FN was well tolerated, but mild to severe reversible myelosuppression was noted. Other complications were rare.
Conclusion: FN is an effective, safe chemotherapy combination for patients with advanced-stage, low-grade lymphoma. Clinical outcomes were comparable to prior published data using anthracycline-based regimens.
Supported in part by the following Public Health Service Cooperative Agreement grants awarded by the National Cancer Institute, United States Department of Health and Human Services: CA38926, CA32102, CA13612, CA35261, CA04920, CA35431, CA45377, CA58416, CA46282, CA35119, CA96429, CA12644, CA45450, CA04919, CA42777, CA27057, CA58686, CA45560, CA22433, CA76462, CA37981, CA35178, CA35176, CA12213, CA20319, CA63850, CA52654, CA58415, CA35192, CA42028, CA35281, CA46136, and CA58658.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. H. Shanks, D. A. Rizzieri, J. L. Flowers, O. M. Colvin, and D. J. Adams
Preclinical Evaluation of Gemcitabine Combination Regimens for Application in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Clin. Cancer Res.,
June 1, 2005;
11(11):
4225 - 4233.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Foussard, P. Colombat, H. Maisonneuve, C. Berthou, R. Gressin, M.-C. Rousselet, P. Rachieru, B. Pignon, B. Mahe, C. Ghandour, et al.
Long-term follow-up of a randomized trial of fludarabine-mitoxantrone, compared with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vindesine, prednisone (CHVP), as first-line treatment of elderly patients with advanced, low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma before the era of monoclonal antibodies
Ann. Onc.,
March 1, 2005;
16(3):
466 - 472.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Marcus, K. Imrie, A. Belch, D. Cunningham, E. Flores, J. Catalano, P. Solal-Celigny, F. Offner, J. Walewski, J. Raposo, et al.
CVP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CVP as first-line treatment for advanced follicular lymphoma
Blood,
February 15, 2005;
105(4):
1417 - 1423.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Hagemeister, F. Cabanillas, M. Coleman, S. A. Gregory, and P. L. Zinzani
The Role of Mitoxantrone in the Treatment of Indolent Lymphomas
Oncologist,
February 1, 2005;
10(2):
150 - 159.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Vose, P. J. Bierman, C. Enke, J. Hankins, G. Bociek, J. C. Lynch, and J. O. Armitage
Phase I Trial of Iodine-131 Tositumomab With High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation for Relapsed Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
J. Clin. Oncol.,
January 20, 2005;
23(3):
461 - 467.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. L. Zinzani, A. Pulsoni, A. Perrotti, S. Soverini, F. Zaja, A. De Renzo, S. Storti, V. M. Lauta, L. Guardigni, P. Gentilini, et al.
Fludarabine Plus Mitoxantrone With and Without Rituximab Versus CHOP With and Without Rituximab As Front-Line Treatment for Patients With Follicular Lymphoma
J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 1, 2004;
22(13):
2654 - 2661.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|