Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Skates, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, I. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Skates, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, I. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 21, No 10S (May 15 Supplement) 2003: 206s-210s
© 2003 American Society for Clinical Oncology

Calculation of the Risk of Ovarian Cancer From Serial CA-125 Values for Preclinical Detection in Postmenopausal Women

Steven J. Skates, Usha Menon, Nicola MacDonald, Adam N. Rosenthal, David H. Oram, Robert C. Knapp, Ian J. Jacobs

From the Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Gynaecology Cancer Research Unit, St Bartholomew’s and Royal London Hospitals Medical College, London, England; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cornell Medical School, New York, NY.

Address reprint requests to Steven J. Skates, PhD, 50 Staniford St, Suite 560, Boston, MA 02114; email: sskates{at}partners.org.

Purpose: Previous studies of CA-125 levels from screening trials for ovarian cancer have indicated that serial CA-125 levels may identify cases better than a fixed CA-125 cutoff. We conducted a study to assess the screening performance of the risk of ovarian cancer calculation based on serial CA-125 levels from prospectively collected serum samples compared with a fixed CA-125 cutoff.

Patients and Methods: The calculation was applied to data from a prospective trial of screening for ovarian cancer involving 22,000 postmenopausal women older than 45 years. The analysis was performed using 33,621 CA-125 results from 9,233 women for whom two or more serial samples were available. All serum samples from the patients with ovarian cancer were obtained before clinical detection. Sensitivity and specificity levels for preclinical detection of index cancers were calculated for various cutoffs for the risk and a single CA-125 measurement, and receiver operator curves were constructed.

Results: The risk calculation significantly improved the area under the curve from 84% to 93% compared with a fixed cutoff for CA-125 (P = .01). For a target specificity of 98%, the risk achieved a sensitivity of 86% for preclinical detection of ovarian cancer, whereas CA-125 achieved a sensitivity of 62%. The estimates of performance are unbiased, because the risk calculation was derived independent of the data from this trial.

Conclusion: These results provide the first evidence that preclinical detection of ovarian cancer using serial CA-125 levels interpreted with the risk calculation significantly improves screening performance compared with a fixed cutoff for CA-125. The results justify the incorporation of the risk calculation in a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

This research was supported by grants from the Women’s Cancer Program at Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer Program, the National Cancer Institute (CA-57693), and Centocor Inc (S.J.S.) and Research into Ovarian Cancer and The Gynaecology Cancer Research Fund (I.J.; registered charities, London, England).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. L. Clarke-Pearson
Screening for Ovarian Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., July 9, 2009; 361(2): 170 - 177.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
G. D. Aletti, M. M. Gallenberg, W. A. Cliby, A. Jatoi, and L. C. Hartmann
Current Management Strategies for Ovarian Cancer
Mayo Clin. Proc., June 1, 2007; 82(6): 751 - 770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin TrialsHome page
S. G Baker, B. S Kramer, M. McIntosh, B. H Patterson, Y. Shyr, and S. Skates
Evaluating markers for the early detection of cancer: overview of study designs and methods
Clinical Trials, February 1, 2006; 3(1): 43 - 56.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
S. A. Cannistra
Cancer of the Ovary
N. Engl. J. Med., December 9, 2004; 351(24): 2519 - 2529.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online