Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 21, Issue 17
(September), 2003: 3244-3248
© 2003 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Changes in the 2003 American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging for Breast Cancer Dramatically Affect Stage-Specific Survival
Wendy A. Woodward,
Eric A. Strom,
Susan L. Tucker,
Marsha D. McNeese,
George H. Perkins,
Naomi R. Schechter,
S. Eva Singletary,
Richard L. Theriault,
Gabriel N. Hortobagyi,
Kelly K. Hunt,
Thomas A. Buchholz
From the Departments of Radiation Oncology, Biomathematics, Surgical Oncology, and Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Address reprint requests to Thomas A. Buchholz, MD, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 97, Houston, TX 77030; e-mail: tbuchhol{at}mdanderson.org.
Purpose: To evaluate how implementation of the 2003 American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system will affect stage-specific survival of breast cancer patients.
Patients and Methods: Records of 1,350 patients treated on sequential institutional protocols with mastectomy and adjuvant doxorubicin-based chemotherapy were reviewed. Pathologic stage was assigned retrospectively according to the 1988 and the 2003 AJCC staging criteria. Overall stage-specific survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and hypothetical differences were compared by the log-rank test.
Results: Six hundred five of 1,087 patients with stage II disease according to the 1988 classification system had stage II disease according to the 2003 system. The 10-year OS for patients with stage II disease was significantly improved using the 2003 system (76% [2003] v 65% [1988]; P < .0001). Two hundred eighty-nine of 633 patients with stage IIb disease using the 1988 system were stage IIb with the 2003 system, and 10-year OS was 58% (1988) versus 70% (2003; P = .003). The number of patients with stage III disease increased from 207 (1988) to 443 (2003), and the 10-year OS changed from 45% (1988) to 50% (2003; P = .077). Most of this difference resulted from changes within stage IIIa: OS, 45% (1988) versus 59% (2003; P < .0001).
Conclusion: Stage reclassification using the new AJCC staging system for breast cancer will result in significant changes in reported outcome by stage. It is imperative that careful attention is devoted to this effect so that accurate conclusions regarding the efficacy of new treatment strategies can be drawn.
Supported in part by grant Nos. CA16672 and T32CA77050 from the National Cancer Institute, the Nellie B. Connally Breast Cancer Research Fund, and a grant from the Stanford and Joan Alexander Foundation, Houston, TX. T.A.B. is supported by Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program Career Development Award, BC980154.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Sozzani, R. Arisio, M. Porpiglia, and C. Benedetto
Is Sialyl Lewis x Antigen Expression a Prognostic Factor in Patients With Breast Cancer?
International Journal of Surgical Pathology,
October 1, 2008;
16(4):
365 - 374.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-S. Huang, S.-H. Kuo, H.-C. Lien, S.-Y. Yang, S.-L. You, C.-Y. Shen, C.-H. Lin, Y.-S. Lu, and K.-J. Chang
The CYP19 TTTA Repeat Polymorphism Is Related to the Prognosis of Premenopausal Stage I-II and Operable Stage III Breast Cancers
Oncologist,
July 1, 2008;
13(7):
751 - 760.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. A. Vanderveen, P. D. Schneider, V. P. Khatri, J. E. Goodnight, and R. J. Bold
Upstaging and Improved Survival of Early Breast Cancer Patients after Implementation of Sentinel Node Biopsy for Axillary Staging
Ann. Surg. Oncol.,
November 1, 2006;
13(11):
1450 - 1456.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. A. Woodward, V. Vinh-Hung, N. T. Ueno, Y. C. Cheng, M. Royce, P. Tai, G. Vlastos, A. M. Wallace, G. N. Hortobagyi, and Y. Nieto
Prognostic Value of Nodal Ratios in Node-Positive Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 20, 2006;
24(18):
2910 - 2916.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. M. Morrell, M. Y. Halyard, S. E. Schild, M. S. Ali, L. L. Gunderson, and B. A. Pockaj
Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema
Mayo Clin. Proc.,
November 1, 2005;
80(11):
1480 - 1484.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. C. Albertsen, J. A. Hanley, G. H. Barrows, D. F. Penson, P. D. H. Kowalczyk, M. M. Sanders, and J. Fine
Prostate Cancer and the Will Rogers Phenomenon
J Natl Cancer Inst,
September 7, 2005;
97(17):
1248 - 1253.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. Stewart, A. H. G. Paterson, J. D. Ruether, J. Russell, P. Craighead, M. Smylie, and J. Mackey
High-dose mitoxantrone-vinblastine-cyclophosphamide and autologous stem cell transplantation for stage III breast cancer: final results of a prospective multicentre study
Ann. Onc.,
September 1, 2005;
16(9):
1463 - 1468.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. A. Perez, V. J. Suman, N. E. Davidson, P. A. Kaufman, S. Martino, S. R. Dakhil, J. N. Ingle, R. J. Rodeheffer, B. J. Gersh, and A. S. Jaffe
Effect of Doxorubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide on Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients With Breast Cancer in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N9831 Intergroup Adjuvant Trial
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 15, 2004;
22(18):
3700 - 3704.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. R. McCready, W. S. Yong, A. K. T. Ng, N. Miller, S. Done, and B. Youngson
Influence of the New AJCC Breast Cancer Staging System on Sentinel Lymph Node Positivity and False-Negative Rates
J Natl Cancer Inst,
June 2, 2004;
96(11):
873 - 875.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. A. Olivotto, P. T. Truong, and C. H. Speers
Staging Reclassification Affects Breast Cancer Survival
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 1, 2003;
21(23):
4467 - 4468.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|