Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Erratum (v22,p1169)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ladewski, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ladewski, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, C. L.
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 21, Issue 20 (October), 2003: 3859-3866
© 2003 American Society for Clinical Oncology

Dissemination of Information on Potentially Fatal Adverse Drug Reactions for Cancer Drugs From 2000 to 2002: First Results From the Research on Adverse Drug Events and Reports Project

Lisa A. Ladewski, Steven M. Belknap, Jonathan R. Nebeker, Oliver Sartor, E. Allison Lyons, Timothy C. Kuzel, Martin S. Tallman, Dennis W. Raisch, Amy R. Auerbach, Glen T. Schumock, Hau C. Kwaan, Charles L. Bennett

From the Veterans Affairs Midwest Center for Health Services and Policy Research, Lakeside Division, the Division of Hematology/Oncology of the Department of Medicine, the Center for Healthcare Studies, and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Medical Center; the Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, The Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University; the Center for Pharmacoeconomic Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL; the Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System and the University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT; the Stanley S. Scott Cancer Center and Section of Hematology/Oncology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA; and the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program Clinical Research Pharmacy Coordinating Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM.

Address reprint requests to Charles L. Bennett, MD, PhD, VA Lakeside Medical Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, 400 E Ontario St, Suite 205, Chicago, IL 60611; e-mail: cbenne{at}northwestern.edu.

Purpose: To describe the clinical findings, occurrence rates, causality evidence, and dissemination media for serious cancer drug–associated adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported in the postmarketing setting.

Methods: ADRs were termed serious if they resulted in death or severe organ failure. ADR information for oncology drugs from package insert (PI) revisions, so-called Dear Doctor letters, and journal articles was evaluated to identify serious ADRs reported from 2000 to 2002. Timing and content of information disseminated was assessed.

Results: Twenty-five serious ADRs associated with 22 oncology drugs were identified after approval. Approximately half of these serious ADRs are associated with drugs approved before 1995. ADRs were described in articles in medical journals (17 ADRs), PI revisions (18 ADRs), and Dear Doctor letters (12 ADRs). PI revisions occurred less than 1 year after peer-reviewed publication for four ADRs. These revisions often differed for similar ADRs that occurred with drugs of the same class. Five of the seven ADRs lacking PI changes occurred with off-label use, for which PI change is not recommended by US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) policy. No cancer drug was withdrawn from the market during the observation period.

Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that serious ADRs may be discovered as long as 36 years after a drug receives FDA approval. This suggests a need for continued vigilance and efficient strategies for dissemination of information about ADRs associated with cancer drugs.

Presented in part at the 39th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Chicago, IL, May 2003.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
N. Mori, K. Glunde, T. Takagi, V. Raman, and Z. M. Bhujwalla
Choline Kinase Down-regulation Increases the Effect of 5-Fluorouracil in Breast Cancer Cells
Cancer Res., December 1, 2007; 67(23): 11284 - 11290.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
M. J. Hassett, A. J. O'Malley, J. R. Pakes, J. P. Newhouse, and C. C. Earle
Frequency and cost of chemotherapy-related serious adverse effects in a population sample of women with breast cancer.
J Natl Cancer Inst, August 16, 2006; 98(16): 1108 - 1117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
C. L. Bennett, S. Luminari, A. R. Nissenson, M. S. Tallman, S. A. Klinge, N. McWilliams, J. M. McKoy, B. Kim, E. A. Lyons, S. M. Trifilio, et al.
Pure Red-Cell Aplasia and Epoetin Therapy
N. Engl. J. Med., September 30, 2004; 351(14): 1403 - 1408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. R. Nebeker, P. Barach, and M. H. Samore
Clarifying Adverse Drug Events: A Clinician's Guide to Terminology, Documentation, and Reporting
Ann Intern Med, May 18, 2004; 140(10): 795 - 801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R. L. Schilsky
Hurry Up and Wait: Is Accelerated Approval of New Cancer Drugs in the Best Interests of Cancer Patients?
J. Clin. Oncol., October 15, 2003; 21(20): 3718 - 3720.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 Site Map

Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online