Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.089 on October 27 2003
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 21, Issue 23
(December), 2003: 4270-4276
© 2003 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Multicentric Study Comparing Intravesical Chemotherapy Alone and With Local Microwave Hyperthermia for Prophylaxis of Recurrence of Superficial Transitional Cell Carcinoma
Renzo Colombo,
Luigi Filippo Da Pozzo,
Andrea Salonia,
Patrizio Rigatti,
Zvi Leib,
Jack Baniel,
Emanuele Caldarera,
Michele Pavone-Macaluso
From the Department of Urology, University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; the Department of Urology, Beilinson Hospital, Tel Aviv, Israel; and the University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Address reprint requests to Renzo Colombo, MD, Department of Urology, University Vita-Salute, San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; e-mail: renzo.colombo{at}hsr.it.
Purpose: To compare the efficacy and local toxicity of the intravesical instillation of a cytostatic drug versus the same cytostatic agent in combination with local hyperthermia as an adjuvant treatment, after complete transurethral resection (TURB) of superficial transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder.
Patients and Methods: The study was designed as a prospective, multicentric, randomized trial. Eighty-three patients suffering from primary or recurrent superficial (Ta-T1) TCC of the bladder, after a complete TURB, were randomly assigned to receive intravesical instillations of mitomycin C (MMC) alone, for 41 patients, and MMC in combination with local microwave-induced hyperthermia, for 42 patients. For the combined approach, a new system, Synergo1011 (Medical Enterprises, Amsterdam, the Netherlands) was used. The effectiveness evaluation end points of the study were evaluation of recurrence-free survival and the estimated probability of recurrence. The safety evaluation end points included subjective and objective side effects and clinical complications. For the efficacy end point, Kaplan-Meier analysis was employed, with the log-rank test for significance. Minimum follow-up time was 24 months.
Results: Of the 83 randomly assigned patients, 75 completed the study according to the protocol and had valid cystoscopy results. Survival analysis of the 75 assessable patients demonstrated a highly significant difference in the survival curves in favor of thermochemotherapy. Subjective intolerance and clinical complications were significantly higher but transient and moderate in the combined treatment group.
Conclusion: In our series, endovesical thermochemotherapy appears to be more effective than standard endovesical chemotherapy as an adjuvant treatment for superficial bladder tumors at 24-month follow-up, despite an increased but acceptable local toxicity.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Moskovitz, G. Meyer, A. Kravtzov, M. Gross, A. Kastin, K. Biton, and O. Nativ
Thermo-chemotherapy for intermediate or high-risk recurrent superficial bladder cancer patients
Ann. Onc.,
April 1, 2005;
16(4):
585 - 589.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Altundag and K. Altundag
Pamidronate, Hypocalcemia, and Calcium and Vitamin D Supplementation
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 15, 2004;
22(10):
2035 - 2035.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. J. Small
In Reply:
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 15, 2004;
22(10):
2035 - 2035.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. L. Lamm
Intravesical Therapy for Superficial Bladder Cancer: Slow but Steady Progress
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 1, 2003;
21(23):
4259 - 4260.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|