Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ring, A.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, I.E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ring, A.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, I.E.
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 21, Issue 24 (December), 2003: 4540-4545
© 2003 American Society for Clinical Oncology

Is Surgery Necessary After Complete Clinical Remission Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Early Breast Cancer?

A. Ring, A. Webb, S. Ashley, W.H. Allum, S. Ebbs, G. Gui, N.P. Sacks, G. Walsh, I.E. Smith

From the Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

Address reprint requests to Ian E. Smith, MD, Breast Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, Fulham Rd, London SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom; e-mail: ian.smith{at}rmh.nthames.nhs.uk.

Purpose: This retrospective analysis aimed to identify whether breast cancer patients receiving radiotherapy alone following a complete clinical remission (cCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy had a worse outcome than those treated with surgery.

Patients and Methods: One hundred thirty-six patients who had achieved a cCR to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer were identified from a prospectively maintained database of 453 patients. Of these, 67 patients had undergone surgery as their primary locoregional therapy, and 69 patients had radiotherapy alone. Outcome was assessed in relation to local recurrence-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival.

Results: Median follow-up was 63 months in the surgery group and 87 months in the no surgery group. Prognostic characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. For surgery and no surgery, respectively, there were no significant differences in disease-free survival or overall survival (5-year, 74% v 76%; 10-year, 60% v 70%, P = .9) between the two groups. There was a nonsignificant trend toward increased locoregional-only recurrence for the no surgery group (21% v 10% at 5 years; P = .09), but no long-term failures of local control. Patients in the no surgery group who also achieved an ultrasound complete remission had a 5-year local recurrence rate of only 8%.

Conclusion: In patients achieving a cCR to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy alone achieve survival rates as good as with surgery, but with higher local recurrence rates. Ultrasound may identify a low recurrence rate subgroup for assessing no surgery in a prospective trial.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
B. Sirohi, M. Arnedos, S. Popat, S. Ashley, A. Nerurkar, G. Walsh, S. Johnston, and I. E. Smith
Platinum-based chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer
Ann. Onc., June 20, 2008; (2008) mdn395v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
M. Kaufmann, G. von Minckwitz, H. D. Bear, A. Buzdar, P. McGale, H. Bonnefoi, M. Colleoni, C. Denkert, W. Eiermann, R. Jackesz, et al.
Recommendations from an international expert panel on the use of neoadjuvant (primary) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer: new perspectives 2006
Ann. Onc., December 1, 2007; 18(12): 1927 - 1934.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
S. Chua, I. E. Smith, R. P. A'Hern, G. A. Coombes, T. F. Hickish, A. C. Robinson, R. W. Laing, M. E. R. O'Brien, S. R. Ebbs, A. Hong, et al.
Neoadjuvant vinorelbine/epirubicin (VE) versus standard adriamycin/cyclophosphamide (AC) in operable breast cancer: analysis of response and tolerability in a randomised phase III trial (TOPIC 2)
Ann. Onc., September 1, 2005; 16(9): 1435 - 1441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. A. Newman and H. M. Kuerer
Advances in Breast Conservation Therapy
J. Clin. Oncol., March 10, 2005; 23(8): 1685 - 1697.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. Spadaro, E. Ambrosino, M. Iezzi, E. Di Carlo, P. Sacchetti, C. Curcio, A. Amici, W.-Z. Wei, P. Musiani, P.-L. Lollini, et al.
Cure of Mammary Carcinomas in Her-2 Transgenic Mice through Sequential Stimulation of Innate (Neoadjuvant Interleukin-12) and Adaptive (DNA Vaccine Electroporation) Immunity
Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2005; 11(5): 1941 - 1952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
I. E. Smith, R. P. A'Hern, G. A. Coombes, A. Howell, S. R. Ebbs, T. F. Hickish, M. E. R. O'Brien, J. L. Mansi, C. B. Wilson, A. C. Robinson, et al.
A novel continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy regimen compared with conventional chemotherapy in the neo-adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer: 5 year results of the TOPIC trial
Ann. Onc., May 1, 2004; 15(5): 751 - 758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
H. D. Bear
In Reply:
J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2004; 22(9): 1766 - 1767.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online