Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 21, Issue 3
(February), 2003: 428-432
© 2003 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Whole Body 18FDG-PET and the Response of Esophageal Cancer to Induction Therapy: Results of a Prospective Trial
Robert J. Downey,
Tim Akhurst,
David Ilson,
Robert Ginsberg,
Manjit S. Bains,
Mithat Gonen,
Heng Koong,
Marc Gollub,
Bruce D. Minsky,
Maureen Zakowski,
Alan Turnbull,
Steven M. Larson,
Valerie Rusch
From the Thoracic Service and Gastric and Mixed Tumor Service, Department of Surgery, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Division of GI Radiology, Department of Radiology, Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Department of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; National Cancer Center, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; and Division of Thoracic Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Address reprint requests to Robert J Downey, MD, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021; email: downeyr{at}mskcc.org.
Purpose: Whole-body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging before and after induction therapy was prospectively evaluated in patients with esophageal cancer to determine whether changes in PET images could measure response to therapy.
Patients and Methods: Between April 1997 and April 1999, 39 patients (34 men and five women; median age, 59 years; range, 36 to 76 years) with esophageal cancer were prospectively enrolled in a single-institution clinical trial of staging, including PET, induction therapy, restaging including PET, and esophagectomy. All patients undergoing esophagectomy after induction therapy (n = 17) were followed either to recurrence, to death, or through a disease-free interval of at least 24 months.
Results: PET after standard staging studies and before therapy imaged undetected sites of metastatic disease in six patients (15%). Restaging (including PET) after induction therapy did not identify any patients with disease progression or any patients with loco-regionally unresectable disease at exploration. The median decrease in the standardized uptake value (SUV) during induction therapy was 59%. After R0 esophagectomy, the 2-year disease-free and overall survival was 38% and 63%, respectively, among patients who had a less than 60% decrease in SUV, and 67% and 89%, respectively, among patients who had a greater than 60% decrease in SUV (P = .055 and P = .088, respectively).
Conclusion: Compared with conventional imaging, PET detects additional sites of metastatic disease at initial evaluation. After induction therapy, PET did not add to the estimation of loco-regional resectability and did not detect new distant metastases. However, changes in [18F]FDG PET may predict disease-free and overall survival after induction therapy and resection in patients with esophageal cancer. Further evaluation in larger trials is warranted.
Supported in part by National Cancer Institute grant no. 40166913.
Presented in part at the Thirty-seventh Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, San Francisco, California, May 1215, 2001.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. B. Roedl, M. G. Harisinghani, R. R. Colen, A. J. Fischman, M. A. Blake, D. J. Mathisen, and P. R. Mueller
Assessment of treatment response and recurrence in esophageal carcinoma based on tumor length and standardized uptake value on positron emission tomography-computed tomography.
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
October 1, 2008;
86(4):
1131 - 1138.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Higuchi, T. Yasuda, M. Yano, Y. Doki, H. Miyata, M. Tatsumi, H. Fukunaga, S. Takiguchi, Y. Fujiwara, J. Hatazawa, et al.
Lack of fludeoxyglucose F 18 uptake in posttreatment positron emission tomography as a significant predictor of survival after subsequent surgery in multimodality treatment for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.,
July 1, 2008;
136(1):
205 - 212.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
U. Tateishi, C. Gamez, S. Dawood, H. W. D. Yeung, M. Cristofanilli, and H. A. Macapinlac
Bone Metastases in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: Morphologic and Metabolic Monitoring of Response to Systemic Therapy with Integrated PET/CT
Radiology,
April 1, 2008;
247(1):
189 - 196.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. H. Ilson
Combined Modality Therapy for Gastric, Esophageal, and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancers
ASCO Educational Book,
January 1, 2008;
2008(1):
177 - 182.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. F. Bruzzi, R. F. Munden, M. T. Truong, E. M. Marom, B. S. Sabloff, G. W. Gladish, R. B. Iyer, T.-S. Pan, H. A. Macapinlac, and J. J. Erasmus
PET/CT of Esophageal Cancer: Its Role in Clinical Management
RadioGraphics,
November 1, 2007;
27(6):
1635 - 1652.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Port, P. C. Lee, R. J. Korst, Y. Liss, D. Meherally, P. Christos, M. Mazumdar, and N. K. Altorki
Positron Emission Tomographic Scanning Predicts Survival After Induction Chemotherapy for Esophageal Carcinoma
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
August 1, 2007;
84(2):
393 - 400.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Piessen, N. Briez, J.-P. Triboulet, and C. Mariette
Patients with Locally Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma Nonresponder to Radiochemotherapy: Who Will Benefit From Surgery?
Ann. Surg. Oncol.,
July 1, 2007;
14(7):
2036 - 2044.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. F. Meyers, R. J. Downey, P. A. Decker, R. J. Keenan, B. A. Siegel, R. J. Cerfolio, R. J. Landreneau, C. E. Reed, D. M. Balfe, F. Dehdashti, et al.
The utility of positron emission tomography in staging of potentially operable carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus: Results of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0060 trial
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.,
March 1, 2007;
133(3):
738 - 745.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Charnsangavej, B. Clary, Y. Fong, A. Grothey, T. M. Pawlik, and M. A. Choti
Selection of Patients for Resection of Hepatic Colorectal Metastases: Expert Consensus Statement
Ann. Surg. Oncol.,
October 1, 2006;
13(10):
1261 - 1268.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Larson and L. H. Schwartz
18F-FDG PET as a Candidate for "Qualified Biomarker": Functional Assessment of Treatment Response in Oncology
J. Nucl. Med.,
June 1, 2006;
47(6):
901 - 903.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Volpe
The Growing Pains of Neoadjuvant Trials for Gastroesophageal Carcinoma
Ann. Surg. Oncol.,
March 1, 2006;
13(3):
285 - 287.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Rizk, R. J. Downey, T. Akhurst, M. Gonen, M. S. Bains, S. Larson, and V. Rusch
Preoperative (18)[F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Standardized Uptake Values Predict Survival After Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Resection.
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
March 1, 2006;
81(3):
1076 - 1081.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. R. Henry, M. Goldberg, W. Scott, A. Konski, N. J. Meropol, G. Freedman, L. M. Weiner, P. Watts, M. Beard, S. McLaughlin, et al.
Induction Cisplatin and Paclitaxel Followed by Combination Chemoradiotherapy with 5-Fluorouracil, Cisplatin, and Paclitaxel Before Resection in Localized Esophageal Cancer: A Phase II Report
Ann. Surg. Oncol.,
February 1, 2006;
13(2):
214 - 220.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. A. Wieder, A. J. Beer, F. Lordick, K. Ott, M. Fischer, E. J. Rummeny, S. Ziegler, J. R. Siewer, M. Schwaiger, and W. A. Weber
Comparison of Changes in Tumor Metabolic Activity and Tumor Size During Chemotherapy of Adenocarcinomas of the Esophagogastric Junction
J. Nucl. Med.,
December 1, 2005;
46(12):
2029 - 2034.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. J. Hoekstra, S. G. Stroobants, E. F. Smit, J. Vansteenkiste, H. van Tinteren, P. E. Postmus, R. P. Golding, B. Biesma, F. J.H.M. Schramel, N. van Zandwijk, et al.
Prognostic Relevance of Response Evaluation Using [18F]-2-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography in Patients With Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
November 20, 2005;
23(33):
8362 - 8370.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W A Weber
PET for response assessment in oncology: radiotherapy and chemotherapy
Br. J. Radiol.,
November 1, 2005;
Supplement_28(1):
42 - 49.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Avril, S. Sassen, B. Schmalfeldt, J. Naehrig, S. Rutke, W. A. Weber, M. Werner, H. Graeff, M. Schwaiger, and W. Kuhn
Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy by Sequential F-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Patients With Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 20, 2005;
23(30):
7445 - 7453.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Westerterp, H. L. van Westreenen, J. B. Reitsma, O. S. Hoekstra, J. Stoker, P. Fockens, P. L. Jager, B. L. F. Van Eck-Smit, J. T. M. Plukker, J. J. B. van Lanschot, et al.
Esophageal Cancer: CT, Endoscopic US, and FDG PET for Assessment of Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy--Systematic Review
Radiology,
September 1, 2005;
236(3):
841 - 851.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. P. Tew, D. P. Kelsen, and D. H. Ilson
Targeted Therapies for Esophageal Cancer
Oncologist,
September 1, 2005;
10(8):
590 - 601.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. Berger, J. Farma, W. J. Scott, G. Freedman, L. Weiner, J. D. Cheng, H. Wang, and M. Goldberg
Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Carcinoma Is Associated With Significantly Improved Survival
J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 1, 2005;
23(19):
4330 - 4337.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Cerfolio, A. S. Bryant, B. Ohja, A. A. Bartolucci, and M. A. Eloubeidi
The accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography with fine-needle aspiration, integrated positron emission tomography with computed tomography, and computed tomography in restaging patients with esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.,
June 1, 2005;
129(6):
1232 - 1241.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Tahara, A. Ohtsu, S. Hironaka, N. Boku, S. Ishikura, Y. Miyata, T. Ogino, and S. Yoshida
Clinical Impact of Criteria for Complete Response (CR) of Primary Site to Treatment of Esophageal Cancer
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 1, 2005;
35(6):
316 - 323.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. J. Kelloff, J. M. Hoffman, B. Johnson, H. I. Scher, B. A. Siegel, E. Y. Cheng, B. D. Cheson, J. O'Shaughnessy, K. Z. Guyton, D. A. Mankoff, et al.
Progress and Promise of FDG-PET Imaging for Cancer Patient Management and Oncologic Drug Development
Clin. Cancer Res.,
April 15, 2005;
11(8):
2785 - 2808.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. G. Swisher, M. Maish, J. J. Erasmus, A. M. Correa, J. A. Ajani, R. Bresalier, R. Komaki, H. Macapinlac, R. F. Munden, J. B. Putnam, et al.
Utility of PET, CT, and EUS to Identify Pathologic Responders in Esophageal Cancer
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
October 1, 2004;
78(4):
1152 - 1160.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. A. Wieder, B. L.D.M. Brucher, F. Zimmermann, K. Becker, F. Lordick, A. Beer, M. Schwaiger, U. Fink, J. R. Siewert, H. J. Stein, et al.
Time Course of Tumor Metabolic Activity During Chemoradiotherapy of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Response to Treatment
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 1, 2004;
22(5):
900 - 908.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Kostakoglu and S. J. Goldsmith
PET in the Assessment of Therapy Response in Patients with Carcinoma of the Head and Neck and of the Esophagus
J. Nucl. Med.,
January 1, 2004;
45(1):
56 - 68.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Ott, U. Fink, K. Becker, A. Stahl, H.-J. Dittler, R. Busch, H. Stein, F. Lordick, T. Link, M. Schwaiger, et al.
Prediction of Response to Preoperative Chemotherapy in Gastric Carcinoma by Metabolic Imaging: Results of a Prospective Trial
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 15, 2003;
21(24):
4604 - 4610.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. C. Enzinger and R. J. Mayer
Esophageal Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med.,
December 4, 2003;
349(23):
2241 - 2252.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|