Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 21, Issue 5
(March), 2003: 851-854
© 2003 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Long-Term Survival of Patients With Supraclavicular Metastases at Diagnosis of Breast Cancer
Ivo A. Olivotto,
Boon Chua,
Sharon J. Allan,
Caroline H. Speers,
Stephen Chia,
Joseph Ragaz
From the Breast Cancer Outcomes Unit and Radiation and Systemic Therapy Programs of the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Victoria, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Address reprint requests to I.A. Olivotto, MD, British Columbia Cancer Agency-Vancouver Island Centre, 2410 Lee Ave, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, V8R 6V5; email: iolivott{at}bccancer.bc.ca.
Background: Patients with supraclavicular metastases at diagnosis of breast cancer were classified between 1987 and 2002 as having stage M1 breast cancer according to the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) system. The 2003 edition of the TNM staging guidelines has classified such patients as having stage IIIC disease. To determine relative prognosis, we compared long-term survival in a population-based cohort of patients with isolated supraclavicular metastases (nodal-M1) to outcomes of patients with stage IIIB or M1 (other) disease at presentation.
Materials and Methods: Among patients with breast cancer and known tumor stage referred to the British Columbia Cancer Agency from 1976 to 1985, 336 IIIB, 233 M1, and 51 nodal-M1 patients were identified. Actuarial overall and breast cancerspecific survival rates were determined to 20 years.
Results: Overall survival at 20 years was 13.2% for nodal-M1 cases (95% confidence interval [CI], 5% to 26%), 9.4% for IIIB cases (95% CI, 6% to 14%), and 1.3% for M1 (other) cases (95% CI, 0.4% to 3.5%; log-rank P < .0005). Overall survival was similar between nodal-M1 and IIIB cases (P = .27). Breast cancerspecific survival at 20 years was 24.1% for nodal-M1 cases (95% CI, 13% to 37%), 30.2% for IIIB cases (95% CI, 23% to 38%), and 3.9% for M1 (other) cases (95% CI, 2% to 8%; log-rank P < .0005). Breast cancerspecific survival was significantly different for nodal-M1 cases compared with either IIIB or M1 (other) cases (P = .008 for both).
Conclusion: Patients with supraclavicular metastases at diagnosis have significantly better outcomes than patients with M1 (other) disease and overall survival similar to patients with IIIB disease. Reclassification as stage IIIC is appropriate for patients with breast cancer who present with supraclavicular nodal metastases alone.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Ardavanis, A. Scorilas, D. Tryfonopoulos, G. Orphanos, I. Missitzis, M. Karamouzis, M. Chrysochoou, A. Sotiropoulou, N. Arnogiannaki, G. Ioannidis, et al.
Multidisciplinary therapy of locally far-advanced or inflammatory breast cancer with fixed perioperative sequence of epirubicin, vinorelbine, and Fluorouracil chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy: long-term results.
Oncologist,
June 1, 2006;
11(6):
563 - 573.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Panades, I. A. Olivotto, C. H. Speers, T. Shenkier, T. A. Olivotto, L. Weir, S. J. Allan, and P. T. Truong
Evolving Treatment Strategies for Inflammatory Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Survival Analysis
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 20, 2005;
23(9):
1941 - 1950.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Andre, K. Slimane, T. Bachelot, A. Dunant, M. Namer, A. Barrelier, O. Kabbaj, J. P. Spano, H. Marsiglia, R. Rouzier, et al.
Breast Cancer With Synchronous Metastases: Trends in Survival During a 14-Year Period
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 15, 2004;
22(16):
3302 - 3308.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Shenkier, L. Weir, M. Levine, I. Olivotto, T. Whelan, and L. Reyno
Clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer: 15. Treatment for women with stage III or locally advanced breast cancer
Can. Med. Assoc. J.,
March 16, 2004;
170(6):
983 - 994.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|