Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 21, Issue 9
(May), 2003: 1715-1721
© 2003 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Indium-111Capromab Pendetide Radioimmunoscintigraphy and Prognosis for Durable Biochemical Response to Salvage Radiation Therapy in Men After Failed Prostatectomy
Cherry T. Thomas,
Patrick T. Bradshaw,
Brad H. Pollock,
James E. Montie,
Jeremy M.G. Taylor,
Howard D. Thames,
Patrick W. McLaughlin,
David A. DeBiose,
David H. Hussey,
Richard L. Wahl
From the Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Barrett Center for Cancer Prevention, Treatment and Research, Cincinnati, OH; Center for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio; Department of Biomathematics, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health Systems; Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Health Systems, Ann Arbor, MI; and the Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD.
Address reprint requests to Richard L. Wahl, MD, Department of Radiology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, The Johns Hopkins Outpatient Center, 601 North Caroline St, Room 3231A, Baltimore, MD 21287-0817; email: RWahl{at}jhmi.edu or Cherry.Thomas{at}uc.edu.
Purpose: We evaluated the prognostic significance of indium-111 (111In)capromab pendetide imaging for patients with prostate cancer who underwent salvage radiotherapy (RT) for recurrent disease after prostatectomy.
Patients and Methods: Records were reviewed for all men who underwent 111Incapromab pendetide imaging at a single institution from February 1997 through December 1999. We identified 30 eligible men who were radiographically negative for metastatic disease, who had increasing serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after primary radical prostatectomy, and who received salvage RT. Clinical interpretations of indium monoclonal antibody (In-mab) scan results were compared with postsalvage RT PSA response.
Results: Using an American Society of Therapeutic Radiation and Oncology definition of PSA failure, in men with a positive scan in at least one location (n = 14), the cumulative 2-year PSA control after salvage RT was 0.38 ± 0.13 (± SE) compared with 0.31 ± 0.13 for men with a normal antibody scan in and outside the prostate fossa (n = 15; proportional hazard ratio [PHR] = 1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52 to 3.36). For men with a positive antibody scan limited to the prostate fossa (n = 9), PSA control at 2 years was 0.13 ± 0.12 (PHR 1.77; 95% CI, 0.65 to 4.85). The 2-year probability of PSA control after salvage RT for men with positive scan results outside the prostate bed irrespective of In-mab findings in the prostate fossa (n = 5) was 0.60 ± 0.22 (PHR 0.81; 95% CI, 0.17 to 3.78).
Conclusion: In contrast to previous reports, for patients with postprostatectomy biochemical relapse who received salvage RT, presalvage RT In-mab scan findings outside the prostate fossa were not predictive of biochemical control after RT.
Supported in part by U.S. Government Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service grant no. M01-RR00042 awarded by the National Institutes of Health, National Center for Research Resources, and the National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and the University of Michigan Specialized Program of Research Excellence in Prostate Cancer grant no. SPORE-1-P50-CA69568.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
Related Correspondence
- The Prognostic Significance of Indium-111Capromab Penetide
D.B. Sodee, P.F. Faulhaber, A.D. Nelson, and G. Bakale
JCO 2004 22: 379-380
[Full Text]
Related Reply
- In Reply:
Cherry T. Thomas, Parick T. Bradshaw, Brad H. Pollock, James E. Montie, Jeremy M.G. Taylor, Howard D. Thames, Patrick W. McLaughlin, David A. DeBiose, David H. Hussey, and Richard L. Wahl
JCO 2004 22: 380-381
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. J. Kelloff, P. Choyke, D. S. Coffey, and for The Prostate Cancer Imaging Working Group
Challenges in Clinical Prostate Cancer: Role of Imaging
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
June 1, 2009;
192(6):
1455 - 1470.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. B. Jani, S. L. Liauw, and M. J. Blend
The Role of Indium-111 Radioimmunoscintigraphy in Post-Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy Management of Prostate Cancer Patients
Clin. Med. Res.,
June 1, 2007;
5(2):
123 - 131.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. J. Stephenson, P. T. Scardino, M. W. Kattan, T. M. Pisansky, K. M. Slawin, E. A. Klein, M. S. Anscher, J. M. Michalski, H. M. Sandler, D. W. Lin, et al.
Predicting the Outcome of Salvage Radiation Therapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 20, 2007;
25(15):
2035 - 2041.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Speight and M. Roach III
Advances in the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer: The Role of Anatomic and Functional Imaging in Men Managed With Radiotherapy
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 10, 2007;
25(8):
987 - 995.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. J. Kelloff, K. A. Krohn, S. M. Larson, R. Weissleder, D. A. Mankoff, J. M. Hoffman, J. M. Link, K. Z. Guyton, W. C. Eckelman, H. I. Scher, et al.
The Progress and Promise of Molecular Imaging Probes in Oncologic Drug Development
Clin. Cancer Res.,
November 15, 2005;
11(22):
7967 - 7985.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. B. Hayes and A. Pollack
Parameters for Treatment Decisions for Salvage Radiation Therapy
J. Clin. Oncol.,
November 10, 2005;
23(32):
8204 - 8211.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Schoder, K. Herrmann, M. Gonen, H. Hricak, S. Eberhard, P. Scardino, H. I. Scher, and S. M. Larson
2-[18F]Fluoro-2-Deoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography for the Detection of Disease in Patients with Prostate-Specific Antigen Relapse after Radical Prostatectomy
Clin. Cancer Res.,
July 1, 2005;
11(13):
4761 - 4769.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. M. Pisansky
External Beam Radiotherapy as Curative Treatment of Prostate Cancer
Mayo Clin. Proc.,
July 1, 2005;
80(7):
883 - 898.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Numata, K. Azuma, K. Hashine, and Y. Sumiyoshi
Predictor of Response to Salvage Radiotherapy in Patients with PSA Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy: the Usefulness of PSA Doubling Time
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 1, 2005;
35(5):
256 - 259.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. B. Jani, M. J. Blend, R. Hamilton, C. Brendler, C. Pelizzari, L. Krauz, B. Sapra, S. Vijayakumar, A. Awan, and R. R. Weichselbaum
Radioimmunoscintigraphy for Postprostatectomy Radiotherapy: Analysis of Toxicity and Biochemical Control
J. Nucl. Med.,
August 1, 2004;
45(8):
1315 - 1322.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. J. Schettino, E. L. Kramer, M. E. Noz, S. Taneja, P. Padmanabhan, and H. Lepor
Impact of Fusion of Indium-111 Capromab Pendetide Volume Data Sets with Those from MRI or CT in Patients with Recurrent Prostate Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
August 1, 2004;
183(2):
519 - 524.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. B. Jani, M. J. Blend, R. Hamilton, C. Brendler, C. Pelizzari, L. Krauz, S. Vijayakumar, B. Sapra, A. Awan, and R. R. Weichselbaum
Influence of Radioimmunoscintigraphy on Postprostatectomy Radiotherapy Treatment Decision Making
J. Nucl. Med.,
April 1, 2004;
45(4):
571 - 578.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. J. Stephenson, S. F. Shariat, M. J. Zelefsky, M. W. Kattan, E. B. Butler, B. S. Teh, E. A. Klein, P. A. Kupelian, C. G. Roehrborn, D. A. Pistenmaa, et al.
Salvage Radiotherapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy
JAMA,
March 17, 2004;
291(11):
1325 - 1332.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. S. Anscher
Salvage Radiotherapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer: The Earlier the Better
JAMA,
March 17, 2004;
291(11):
1380 - 1382.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. B. Jani, D. Spelbring, R. Hamilton, M. J. Blend, C. Pelizzari, C. Brendler, L. Krauz, S. Vijayakumar, B. Sapra, and R. R. Weichselbaum
Impact of Radioimmunoscintigraphy on Definition of Clinical Target Volume for Radiotherapy After Prostatectomy
J. Nucl. Med.,
February 1, 2004;
45(2):
238 - 246.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. T. Thomas, P. T. Bradshaw, B. H. Pollock, J. E. Montie, J. M.G. Taylor, H. D. Thames, P. W. McLaughlin, D. A. DeBiose, D. H. Hussey, and R. L. Wahl
In Reply:
J. Clin. Oncol.,
January 15, 2004;
22(2):
380 - 381.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D.B. Sodee, P.F. Faulhaber, A.D. Nelson, and G. Bakale
The Prognostic Significance of Indium-111-Capromab Penetide
J. Clin. Oncol.,
January 15, 2004;
22(2):
379 - 380.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|