Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.176 on April 26 2004

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Save to my personal folders Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Shanafelt, T. D. Articles by Sloan, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Shanafelt, T. D. Articles by Sloan, J. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

Are Chemotherapy Response Rates Related to Treatment-Induced Survival Prolongations in Patients With Advanced Cancer?

From the Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Address reprint requests to Tait Shanafelt, MD, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; e-mail: shanafelt.tait{at}mayo.edu

PURPOSE: Patients with incurable cancer are faced with difficult decisions regarding whether to take chemotherapy in an attempt to preserve the quality and/or prolong the quantity of their lives. The average prolongation in survival with chemotherapy compared with best supportive care has not been well described.

METHODS: We performed a literature search using PUBMED combined with expert inquiry to identify trials comparing cytotoxic chemotherapy with best supportive care. Twenty-five randomized, controlled clinical trials comparing cytotoxic chemotherapy with best supportive care were identified. Sixteen trials (64%) were in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Data were extracted and analyzed.

RESULTS: Sufficient data for statistical modeling were available for NSCLC trials. The mean sample size of the NSCLC trials was 175 patients. Response rates in the treatment arms for NSCLC ranged from 7% to 42%. A relationship between response rate and survival was observed for NSCLC. The estimated relationship for NSCLC suggested that each 3.3% increase in response rate correlated, on average, with a 1-week increase in median survival, and each 2% increase in response rate correlated, on average, with a 1% increase in 1-year survival. The mean increase in 1-year survival for trials of agents with at least a 20% response rate in NSCLC was 16%. Formulas are provided to help estimate how a given response rate may effect median and 1-year survival relative to best supportive care alone for NSCLC.

CONCLUSION: We found a relationship between response rate and both median and 1-year survival in NSCLC. This information may help oncologists estimate how an NSCLC chemotherapy regimen with a given response rate can, on average, impact survival relative to supportive care alone.

Presented in part at the 39th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Chicago, IL, May 31–June 3, 2003.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. G Miller and S. Joffe Benefit in phase 1 oncology trials: therapeutic misconception or reasonable treatment option? Clinical Trials, December 1, 2008; 5(6): 617 - 623. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. E. Harrington and T. J. Smith The Role of Chemotherapy at the End of Life: "When Is Enough, Enough?" JAMA, June 11, 2008; 299(22): 2667 - 2678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. R. Asmis, K. Ding, L. Seymour, F. A. Shepherd, N. B. Leighl, T. L. Winton, M. Whitehead, J. N. Spaans, B. C. Graham, and G. D. Goss Age and Comorbidity As Independent Prognostic Factors in the Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Review of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Trials J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2008; 26(1): 54 - 59. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Matsuyama, S. Reddy, and T. J. Smith Why Do Patients Choose Chemotherapy Near the End of Life? A Review of the Perspective of Those Facing Death From Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., July 20, 2006; 24(21): 3490 - 3496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K.-H. Lee, S.-H. Lee, D.-W. Kim, W. J. Kang, J.-K. Chung, S.-A. Im, T.-Y. Kim, Y. W. Kim, Y.-J. Bang, and D. S. Heo High fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on positron emission tomography in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer on platinum-based combination chemotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2006; 12(14): 4232 - 4236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Tassinari, B. Poggi, E. Tamburini, M. Fantini, S. Nicoletti, and S. Sartori Quality of care in clinical oncology: from the dreamworld to the real world of outcome assessment Ann. Onc., January 1, 2006; 17(1): 177 - 178. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Horstmann, M. S. McCabe, L. Grochow, S. Yamamoto, L. Rubinstein, T. Budd, D. Shoemaker, E. J. Emanuel, and C. Grady Risks and Benefits of Phase 1 Oncology Trials, 1991 through 2002 N. Engl. J. Med., March 3, 2005; 352(9): 895 - 904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Argiris and J. H. Schiller Can Current Treatments for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Be Improved? JAMA, July 28, 2004; 292(4): 499 - 500. [Full Text] [PDF]