Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 22, No 11 (June 1), 2004: pp. 2061-2068
© 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.048
Failure of Higher-Dose Paclitaxel to Improve Outcome in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9342
Eric P. Winer,
Donald A. Berry,
Susan Woolf,
David Duggan,
Alice Kornblith,
Lyndsay N. Harris,
Richard A. Michaelson,
Jeffrey A. Kirshner,
Gini F. Fleming,
Michael C. Perry,
Mark L. Graham,
Stewart A. Sharp,
Roger Keresztes,
I. Craig Henderson,
Clifford Hudis,
Hyman Muss,
Larry Norton
From Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer Care, Boston, MA; State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse; Mount Sinai School of Medicine; Weill Medical College of Cornell University; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Missouri/Ellis Fischel Cancer Center, Columbia, MO; Cancer and Leukemia Group B Statistical Center; Duke University Medical Center, Durham; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; University of California San Francisco Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; and Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, VT.
Address reprint requests to Eric Winer, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney St, D1210, Boston, MA 02115; e-mail: ewiner{at}partners.org
PURPOSE: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Protocol 9342 was initiated to determine the optimal dose of paclitaxel administered as a 3-hour infusion every 3 weeks to women with metastatic breast cancer.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred seventy-four women with metastatic breast cancer who had received one or no prior chemotherapy regimens were randomly assigned to one of three paclitaxel dosing regimens175 mg/m2, 210 mg/m2, or 250 mg/m2each administered as a 3-hour infusion every 3 weeks. Women completed self-administered quality of life and symptom assessment questionnaires at baseline and after three cycles of treatment.
RESULTS: No evidence of a significant dose-response relationship was demonstrated over the dose range assessed. Response rates were 23%, 26%, and 21% for the three regimens, respectively. A marginally significant association (P = .04) was seen between dose and time to progression; however, in a multivariate analysis, the difference was even less apparent. No statistically significant difference was seen in survival. Neurotoxicity and hematologic toxicity were more severe on the higher dose arms. There was no significant difference in quality of life on the three arms.
CONCLUSION: Higher doses of paclitaxel administered as a 3-hour infusion to women with metastatic breast cancer did not improve response rate, survival, or quality of life. There was a slight improvement in time to progression with higher dose therapy, which was offset by greater toxicity. When a 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel is administered every 3 weeks, 175 mg/m2 should be considered the optimal dose.
Supported in part by National Cancer Institute Grants CA32291 (E.W. and A.K.), CA33601 (D.A.B.), CA21060 (S.W. and J.A.K.), CA47577 (L.N.H.), CA04457 (R.A.M.), CA41287 (G.F.F.), CA12046 (M.C.P.), CA47559 (M.L.G.), CA03927 (S.A.S.), CA07968 (R.K.), CA60138 (I.C.H.), CA77651 (C.H. and L.N.), and CA77406 (H.M.).
The contents of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Cancer Institute.
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. N. Polite, C. Cirrincione, G. F. Fleming, D. A. Berry, A. Seidman, H. Muss, L. Norton, C. Shapiro, K. Bakri, K. Marcom, et al.
Racial Differences in Clinical Outcomes From Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of CALGB 9342 and 9840--Cancer and Leukemia Group B
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 1, 2008;
26(16):
2659 - 2665.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. Gonzalez-Angulo and G. N. Hortobagyi
Optimal Schedule of Paclitaxel: Weekly Is Better
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 1, 2008;
26(10):
1585 - 1587.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. D. Seidman, D. Berry, C. Cirrincione, L. Harris, H. Muss, P. K. Marcom, G. Gipson, H. Burstein, D. Lake, C. L. Shapiro, et al.
Randomized Phase III Trial of Weekly Compared With Every-3-Weeks Paclitaxel for Metastatic Breast Cancer, With Trastuzumab for all HER-2 Overexpressors and Random Assignment to Trastuzumab or Not in HER-2 Nonoverexpressors: Final Results of Cancer and Leukemia Group B Protocol 9840
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 1, 2008;
26(10):
1642 - 1649.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. C. Gotay, C. T. Kawamoto, A. Bottomley, and F. Efficace
The Prognostic Significance of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer Clinical Trials
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 10, 2008;
26(8):
1355 - 1363.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Ratain and R. H. Glassman
Biomarkers in Phase I Oncology Trials: Signal, Noise, or Expensive Distraction?
Clin. Cancer Res.,
November 15, 2007;
13(22):
6545 - 6548.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Thomas, J. Tabernero, M. Fornier, P. Conte, P. Fumoleau, A. Lluch, L. T. Vahdat, C. A. Bunnell, H. A. Burris, P. Viens, et al.
Phase II Clinical Trial of Ixabepilone (BMS-247550), an Epothilone B Analog, in Patients With Taxane-Resistant Metastatic Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 10, 2007;
25(23):
3399 - 3406.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Colozza, E. de Azambuja, N. Personeni, F. Lebrun, M. J. Piccart, and F. Cardoso
Achievements in Systemic Therapies in the Pregenomic Era in Metastatic Breast Cancer
Oncologist,
March 1, 2007;
12(3):
253 - 270.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S Beslija, J Bonneterre, H Burstein, V Cocquyt, M Gnant, P Goodwin, V Heinemann, J Jassem, W. Kostler, M Krainer, et al.
Second consensus on medical treatment of metastatic breast cancer
Ann. Onc.,
February 1, 2007;
18(2):
215 - 225.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E Bria, M Di Maio, C Nistico, F Cuppone, E Terzoli, F Cognetti, and D Giannarelli
Factorial design for randomized clinical trials
Ann. Onc.,
October 1, 2006;
17(10):
1607 - 1608.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. R. Green, G. M. Manikhas, S. Orlov, B. Afanasyev, A. M. Makhson, P. Bhar, and M. J. Hawkins
Abraxane(R), a novel Cremophor(R)-free, albumin-bound particle form of paclitaxel for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
Ann. Onc.,
August 1, 2006;
17(8):
1263 - 1268.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. A. Hudis and E. P. Winer
Cancer and leukemia group B breast committee: decades of progress and plans for the future.
Clin. Cancer Res.,
June 1, 2006;
12(11):
3576s - 3580s.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. Lee, J. A. Low, E. Croarkin, R. Parks, A. W. Berman, N. Mannan, S. M. Steinberg, and S. M. Swain
Changes in Neurologic Function Tests May Predict Neurotoxicity Caused by Ixabepilone
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 1, 2006;
24(13):
2084 - 2091.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. L. Hennenfent and R. Govindan
Novel formulations of taxanes: a review. Old wine in a new bottle?
Ann. Onc.,
May 1, 2006;
17(5):
735 - 749.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. Lee and S. M. Swain
Peripheral Neuropathy Induced by Microtubule-Stabilizing Agents
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 1, 2006;
24(10):
1633 - 1642.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. B. Chakravarthy, M. C. Kelley, B. McLaren, C. I. Truica, D. Billheimer, I. A. Mayer, A. M. Grau, D. H. Johnson, J. F. Simpson, R. D. Beauchamp, et al.
Neoadjuvant Concurrent Paclitaxel and Radiation in Stage II/III Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res.,
March 1, 2006;
12(5):
1570 - 1576.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K.-W. Lee, S.-A. Im, T. Yun, E. K. Song, I. i. Na, H. Shin, I. S. Choi, D.-Y. Oh, J. H. Kim, D.-W. Kim, et al.
Phase II Trial of Low-dose Paclitaxel and Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 1, 2005;
35(12):
720 - 726.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. E. Langley, J. Carmichael, A. L. Jones, D. A. Cameron, W. Qian, B. Uscinska, A. Howell, and M. Parmar
Phase III Trial of Epirubicin Plus Paclitaxel Compared With Epirubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide As First-Line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer: United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute Trial AB01
J. Clin. Oncol.,
November 20, 2005;
23(33):
8322 - 8330.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. W. Nyman, K. J. Campbell, E. Hersh, K. Long, K. Richardson, V. Trieu, N. Desai, M. J. Hawkins, and D. D. Von Hoff
Phase I and Pharmacokinetics Trial of ABI-007, a Novel Nanoparticle Formulation of Paclitaxel in Patients With Advanced Nonhematologic Malignancies
J. Clin. Oncol.,
November 1, 2005;
23(31):
7785 - 7793.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. J. Gradishar, S. Tjulandin, N. Davidson, H. Shaw, N. Desai, P. Bhar, M. Hawkins, and J. O'Shaughnessy
Phase III Trial of Nanoparticle Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel Compared With Polyethylated Castor Oil-Based Paclitaxel in Women With Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
November 1, 2005;
23(31):
7794 - 7803.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Harries, P. Ellis, and P. Harper
Nanoparticle Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel for Metastatic Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
November 1, 2005;
23(31):
7768 - 7771.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. V. Boddy, E. R. Plummer, R. Todd, J. Sludden, M. Griffin, L. Robson, J. Cassidy, D. Bissett, A. Bernareggi, M. W. Verrill, et al.
A Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Paclitaxel Poliglumex (XYOTAX), Investigating Both 3-Weekly and 2-Weekly Schedules
Clin. Cancer Res.,
November 1, 2005;
11(21):
7834 - 7840.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. D. Seidman
"Will Weekly Work"? Seems to Be So...
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 1, 2005;
23(25):
5873 - 5874.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.E. Jones, J. Erban, B. Overmoyer, G.T. Budd, L. Hutchins, E. Lower, L. Laufman, S. Sundaram, W.J. Urba, K.I. Pritchard, et al.
Randomized Phase III Study of Docetaxel Compared With Paclitaxel in Metastatic Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 20, 2005;
23(24):
5542 - 5551.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Norton
Conceptual and Practical Implications of Breast Tissue Geometry: Toward a More Effective, Less Toxic Therapy
Oncologist,
June 1, 2005;
10(6):
370 - 381.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Hamilton and G. Hortobagyi
Chemotherapy: What Progress in the Last 5 Years?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 10, 2005;
23(8):
1760 - 1775.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. A. Miller, G. L. Rosner, M. J. Egorin, D. Hollis, S. M. Lichtman, M. J. Ratain, and for the Cancer and Leukemia Group B
Prospective Evaluation of Body Surface Area as a Determinant of Paclitaxel Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Women with Solid Tumors: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study 9763
Clin. Cancer Res.,
December 15, 2004;
10(24):
8325 - 8331.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|