Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 22, No 11 (June 1), 2004: pp. 2202-2206
© 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.12.046

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patz, E. F.
Right arrow Articles by Herndon, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Patz, E. F., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Herndon, J. E., II
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Correspondence
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Estimate of Lung Cancer Mortality From Low-Dose Spiral Computed Tomography Screening Trials: Implications for Current Mass Screening Recommendations

Edward F. Patz, Jr, Stephen J. Swensen, James E. Herndon, II

From the Departments of Radiology, and Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiology, Rochester, MN.

Address reprint requests to Edward F. Patz Jr, MD, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710; e-mail: patz0002{at}mc.duke.edu

PURPOSE: Low-dose computed tomography (CT) has been suggested for lung cancer screening. Several observational trials have published their preliminary results, and some investigators suggest that this technique will save lives. There are no mortality statistics, however, and the current study used published data from these trials to estimate the disease-specific mortality in this high-risk population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two nonrandomized CT screening trials were selected from the literature for analysis. The number of trial participants, the number of lung cancers diagnosed per year, and stage distribution of the cancers was recorded. Previously published 5-year survival data were used to calculate the number of predicted lung cancer deaths and estimate the overall lung cancer mortality per 1,000 person-years among participants screened. These statistics were then compared to the previous Mayo Lung Project, which used chest radiographs and sputum cytology for screening high-risk individuals.

RESULTS: This study estimates the lung cancer mortality is 4.1 deaths per 1,000 person-years in the Mayo Clinic CT screening trial, and is 5.5 deaths per 1,000 person-years in the Early Lung Cancer Action Program trial. These data are similar to the lung cancer mortality of 4.4 deaths per 1,000 person-years in the interventional arm, and 3.9 deaths per 1,000 person-years in the usual-care arm of the previous Mayo Lung Project.

CONCLUSION: These data suggest that CT screening could produce similar outcomes to prior chest radiographic trials in this high-risk group. Results from randomized trials are required, however, before the true utility of mass screening with CT for lung cancer can be determined.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Correspondence

  • Improbable Estimate of Lung Cancer Mortality From Screening Trials
    Melvyn S. Tockman
    JCO 2005 23: 2106-2107 [Full Text]
  • Overestimation of Lung Cancer Mortality in a Computed Tomography–Screened Population
    Frederic W. Grannis
    JCO 2005 23: 2439-2440 [Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ThoraxHome page
J M Reich
A critical appraisal of overdiagnosis: estimates of its magnitude and implications for lung cancer screening
Thorax, April 1, 2008; 63(4): 377 - 383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. G. Ravenel, P. Costello, and G. A. Silvestri
Screening for Lung Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2008; 190(3): 755 - 761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
P. B. Bach, G. A. Silvestri, M. Hanger, and J. R. Jett
Screening for Lung Cancer: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (2nd Edition)
Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3_suppl): 69S - 77S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
P. J Mazzone, J. Hammel, R. Dweik, J. Na, C. Czich, D. Laskowski, and T. Mekhail
Diagnosis of lung cancer by the analysis of exhaled breath with a colorimetric sensor array
Thorax, July 1, 2007; 62(7): 565 - 568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Mujoomdar, J. H. M. Austin, R. Malhotra, C. A. Powell, G. D. N. Pearson, M. C. Shiau, and H. Raftopoulos
Clinical Predictors of Metastatic Disease to the Brain from Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma: Primary Tumor Size, Cell Type, and Lymph Node Metastases
Radiology, March 1, 2007; 242(3): 882 - 888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
G. A. Silvestri
Screening for lung cancer in a high-risk group: but I still haven't found what I'm looking for...
Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2007; 29(1): 6 - 7.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. Unger
A Pause, Progress, and Reassessment in Lung Cancer Screening
N. Engl. J. Med., October 26, 2006; 355(17): 1822 - 1824.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
G. L. Colice
Can you get more than you paid for with lung cancer screening?
Chest, September 1, 2006; 130(3): 632 - 633.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Mascalchi, G. Belli, M. Zappa, G. Picozzi, M. Falchini, R. D. Nave, G. Allescia, A. Masi, A. L. Pegna, N. Villari, et al.
Risk-benefit analysis of X-ray exposure associated with lung cancer screening in the Italung-CT trial.
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 421 - 429.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. M. Reich
Assessing the Efficacy of Lung Cancer Screening
Radiology, February 1, 2006; 238(2): 398 - 401.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. M. Reich, J. L. Mulshine, and D. C. Sullivan
Lung-Cancer Screening
N. Engl. J. Med., November 17, 2005; 353(20): 2194 - 2195.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
S. Novello, C. Fava, P. Borasio, L. Dogliotti, G. Cortese, B. Crida, G. Selvaggi, P. Lausi, M. P. Brizzi, P. Sperone, et al.
Three-year findings of an early lung cancer detection feasibility study with low-dose spiral computed tomography in heavy smokers
Ann. Onc., October 1, 2005; 16(10): 1662 - 1666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
F. W. Grannis
Overestimation of Lung Cancer Mortality in a Computed Tomography-Screened Population
J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2005; 23(10): 2439 - 2440.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. J. Swensen, J. R. Jett, T. E. Hartman, D. E. Midthun, S. J. Mandrekar, S. L. Hillman, A.-M. Sykes, G. L. Aughenbaugh, A. O. Bungum, and K. L. Allen
CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Five-year Prospective Experience
Radiology, April 1, 2005; 235(1): 259 - 265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
E. F. Patz Jr, S. J. Swensen, and J. E. Herndon
In Reply:
J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2005; 23(9): 2107 - 2108.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. S. Tockman
Improbable Estimate of Lung Cancer Mortality From Screening Trials
J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2005; 23(9): 2106 - 2107.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. J. Stanley
Screening Revisited
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2004; 183(6): 1537 - 1537.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online