This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Save to my personal folders Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Laack, E. Articles by Hossfeld, D.K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Laack, E. Articles by Hossfeld, D.K. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

Randomized Phase III Study of Gemcitabine and Vinorelbine Versus Gemcitabine, Vinorelbine, and Cisplatin in the Treatment of Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: From the German and Swiss Lung Cancer Study Group

From the University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, University Hospital Magdeburg, Hospital Hofheim, Nordwest Hospital Frankfurt, Franziskus Hospital Flensburg, Hospital Chemnitz, University Hospital Kiel, Marien Hospital Hamm, Hospital Köln-Merheim, University Hospital Lübeck, St Hildegardis Hospital Mainz, University Hospital-Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Hospital Hanau, and the German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg, Germany

Address reprint requests to Eckart Laack, MD, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany; e-mail: laack{at}uke.uni-hamburg.de

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether cisplatin-based chemotherapy (gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and cisplatin [GVP]) prolongs overall survival in comparison to cisplatin-free chemotherapy (gemcitabine and vinorelbine [GV]) as first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between September 1999 and June 2001, 300 patients with NSCLC stage IIIB with malignant pleural effusion or stage IV disease were randomly assigned to receive GV (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² + vinorelbine 25 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks) or GVP (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² + vinorelbine 25 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 + cisplatin 75 mg/m² on day 2 every 3 weeks). Primary end point of the study was overall survival.

RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-seven patients (GV, 143 patients; GVP, 144 patients) were eligible for analysis. At the time of analysis, April 15, 2002, 209 patients (GV, 103 patients; GVP, 106 patients) of 287 patients had died (73%). No statistically significant difference was observed for overall survival (P = .73; median survival, 35.9 versus 32.4 weeks; 1-year survival rate, 33.6% versus 27.5%) as well as for event-free survival (P = .35; median time-to-event, 19.3 versus 22.3 weeks) between GV and GVP. Two hundred fourteen patients were assessable for best response. The overall response rates were 13.0% for GV versus 28.3% for GVP (P = .004; complete responders, 0% versus 3.8%; partial responders, 13.0% versus 24.5%). Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity was significantly lower in the GV treatment arm compared with GVP. No statistically significant difference in quality of life was observed.

CONCLUSION: In this phase III study, the cisplatin-based GVP regimen showed no survival benefit as first-line chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC when compared with the cisplatin-free GV regimen, which was substantially better tolerated.

The trial was supported in part by Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, and Pierre Fabre Pharma GmbH, Freiburg, Germany.

Preliminary results of this study were presented at the 27th European Society for Medical Oncology Congress in Nice, France, October 18-22, 2002.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J-P. Sculier and D. Moro-Sibilot First- and second-line therapy for advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2009; 33(4): 915 - 930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. D. Cole, C. L. Schwartz, R. A. Drachtman, P. A. de Alarcon, L. Chen, and T. M. Trippett Phase II Study of Weekly Gemcitabine and Vinorelbine for Children With Recurrent or Refractory Hodgkin's Disease: A Children's Oncology Group Report J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2009; 27(9): 1456 - 1461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P Comella, G Filippelli, G De Cataldis, B Massidda, G Frasci, L Maiorino, C Putzu, S Mancarella, S Palmeri, R Cioffi, et al. Efficacy of the combination of cisplatin with either gemcitabine and vinorelbine or gemcitabine and paclitaxel in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III randomised trial of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group (SICOG 0101) Ann. Onc., February 1, 2007; 18(2): 324 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Hainsworth, D. R. Spigel, S. Litchy, and F. A. Greco Phase II Trial of Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, and Etoposide in Advanced Poorly Differentiated Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: A Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network Study J. Clin. Oncol., August 1, 2006; 24(22): 3548 - 3554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Booton, P. Lorigan, H. Anderson, S. Baka, L. Ashcroft, M. Nicolson, M. O'Brien, D. Dunlop, K. O'Byrne, V. Laurence, et al. A phase III trial of docetaxel/carboplatin versus mitomycin C/ifosfamide/cisplatin (MIC) or mitomycin C/vinblastine/cisplatin (MVP) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised multicentre trial of the British Thoracic Oncology Group (BTOG1) Ann. Onc., July 1, 2006; 17(7): 1111 - 1119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Ramnath, E. Sommers, L. Robinson, C. Nwogu, A. Sharma, A. Cantor, and G. Bepler Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Gemcitabine and Vinorelbine in Resectable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Chest, November 1, 2005; 128(5): 3467 - 3474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. Gralla Quality-of-Life Considerations in Patients with Advanced Lung Cancer: Effect of Topotecan on Symptom Palliation and Quality of Life Oncologist, December 1, 2004; 9(suppl_6): 14 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]