Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 22, No 14 (July 15), 2004: pp. 2942-2953
© 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.181
Bone Imaging in Metastatic Breast Cancer
Tsuyoshi Hamaoka,
John E. Madewell,
Donald A. Podoloff,
Gabriel N. Hortobagyi,
Naoto T. Ueno
From the Breast Cancer Research Program and the Departments of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Diagnostic Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, and Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Address reprint requests to N.T. Ueno, MD, PhD, Breast Cancer Research Program, Department of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 448, Houston, TX 77030; e-mail: nueno{at}mdanderson.org
Bone is the most common site to which breast cancer metastasizes. Imagingby skeletal scintigraphy, plain radiography, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imagingis an essential part, and positron emission tomography or single-photon emission computed tomography have a potential of evaluating bone metastases, but no consensus exists as to the best modality for diagnosing the lesion and for assessing its response to treatment. Imaging bone metastases is problematic because the lesions can be osteolytic, osteoblastic, or mixed, and imaging modalities are based on either direct anatomic visualization of the bone or tumor or indirect measurements of bone or tumor metabolism. Although bone metastases can be treated, their response to treatment is considered "unmeasurable" according to existing response criteria. Therefore, the process by which oncologists and radiologists diagnose and monitor the response of bone metastases needs revision, and the current inability to assess the response of bone metastases excludes patients with breast cancer and bone disease from participating in clinical trials of new treatments for breast cancer. In this review of the MEDLINE literature, we discuss the pros and cons of each modality for diagnosing bone metastases and for assessing their response to treatment and we present a practical approach for diagnosis and assessment of bone metastasis.
Supported by the Public Health Research Foundation's Comprehensive Support Project for Oncology Research in Breast Cancer in Japan.
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. H. M. A. Bartels, Y. M. van der Linden, and W. T. A. van der Graaf
Spinal Extradural Metastasis: Review of Current Treatment Options
CA Cancer J Clin,
July 1, 2008;
58(4):
245 - 259.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
U. Tateishi, C. Gamez, S. Dawood, H. W. D. Yeung, M. Cristofanilli, and H. A. Macapinlac
Bone Metastases in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: Morphologic and Metabolic Monitoring of Response to Systemic Therapy with Integrated PET/CT
Radiology,
April 1, 2008;
247(1):
189 - 196.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Zelinka, H. J L M Timmers, A. Kozupa, C. C Chen, J. A Carrasquillo, J. C Reynolds, A. Ling, G. Eisenhofer, I. Lazurova, K. T Adams, et al.
Role of positron emission tomography and bone scintigraphy in the evaluation of bone involvement in metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: specific implications for succinate dehydrogenase enzyme subunit B gene mutations
Endocr. Relat. Cancer,
March 1, 2008;
15(1):
311 - 323.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Suzuki, H. Jacobsson, T. Hatschek, M. R. Torkzad, K. Boden, Y. Eriksson-Alm, E. Berg, H. Fujii, A. Kubo, and L. Blomqvist
Radiologic Measurements of Tumor Response to Treatment: Practical Approaches and Limitations
RadioGraphics,
March 1, 2008;
28(2):
329 - 344.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Du, I. Cullum, T. M. Illidge, and P. J. Ell
Fusion of Metabolic Function and Morphology: Sequential [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron-Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Studies Yield New Insights Into the Natural History of Bone Metastases in Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 10, 2007;
25(23):
3440 - 3447.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. E. Lecouvet, D. Geukens, A. Stainier, F. Jamar, J. Jamart, B. J. d'Othee, P. Therasse, B. V. Berg, and B. Tombal
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Axial Skeleton for Detecting Bone Metastases in Patients With High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Diagnostic and Cost-Effectiveness and Comparison With Current Detection Strategies
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 1, 2007;
25(22):
3281 - 3287.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. C. Lee, S. Sud, C. R. Meyer, B. A. Moffat, T. L. Chenevert, A. Rehemtulla, K. J. Pienta, and B. D. Ross
An Imaging Biomarker of Early Treatment Response in Prostate Cancer that Has Metastasized to the Bone
Cancer Res.,
April 15, 2007;
67(8):
3524 - 3528.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F.-Y. Liu and T.-C. Yen
In Reply
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 1, 2007;
25(10):
1297 - 1299.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. D. O'Connor, J. Yao, and R. M. Summers
Lytic Metastases in Thoracolumbar Spine: Computer-aided Detection at CT--Preliminary Study
Radiology,
March 1, 2007;
242(3):
811 - 816.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. E. Sprague, H. Kitaura, W. Zou, Y. Ye, S. Achilefu, K. N. Weilbaecher, S. L. Teitelbaum, and C. J. Anderson
Noninvasive Imaging of Osteoclasts in Parathyroid Hormone-Induced Osteolysis Using a 64Cu-Labeled RGD Peptide
J. Nucl. Med.,
February 1, 2007;
48(2):
311 - 318.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Romer, A. Nomayr, M. Uder, W. Bautz, and T. Kuwert
SPECT-Guided CT for Evaluating Foci of Increased Bone Metabolism Classified as Indeterminate on SPECT in Cancer Patients
J. Nucl. Med.,
July 1, 2006;
47(7):
1102 - 1106.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F.-Y. Liu, J. T. Chang, H.-M. Wang, C.-T. Liao, C.-J. Kang, S.-K. Ng, S.-C. Chan, and T.-C. Yen
[18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Is More Sensitive Than Skeletal Scintigraphy for Detecting Bone Metastasis in Endemic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma at Initial Staging
J. Clin. Oncol.,
February 1, 2006;
24(4):
599 - 604.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Even-Sapir
Imaging of Malignant Bone Involvement by Morphologic, Scintigraphic, and Hybrid Modalities
J. Nucl. Med.,
August 1, 2005;
46(8):
1356 - 1367.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. C Gainford, G. Dranitsaris, and M. Clemons
Systemic Treatment of Bone Metastases From Breast Cancer: Is It All That It's Cracked Up to Be?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 20, 2005;
23(21):
4802 - 4803.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Hamaoka, J. E. Madewell, D. A. Podoloff, G. N. Hortobagyi, and N. T. Ueno
In Reply:
J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 20, 2005;
23(21):
4803 - 4803.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|