Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 22, No 15 (August 1), 2004: pp. 3046-3052
© 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.02.104

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hehn, S. T.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, T. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hehn, S. T.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, T. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Utility of Fine-Needle Aspiration As a Diagnostic Technique in Lymphoma

Sean T. Hehn, Thomas M. Grogan, Thomas P. Miller

From the Departments of Medicine and Pathology and the Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ

Address reprint requests to Thomas P. Miller, MD, Arizona Cancer Center, 1515 N Campbell Ave, PO Box 245024, Tucson, AZ 85724-5024

PURPOSE: To evaluate, from a clinician's perspective, the sensitivity and specificity of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) as a technique for the diagnosis of lymphoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Medical records of 470 new patients seen in one lymphoma specialist's clinic from January 1998 through December 2002 were reviewed. Ninety-nine (21%) of the 470 patients underwent a total of 115 FNA procedures, which were assessed by more than 70 different pathologists in 32 different pathology departments. Subsequent excisional biopsies were performed in 67 of these patients and interpreted by a single hematopathology group without independent review.

RESULTS: Of 115 FNA procedures, 93 were completed for the initial evaluation of lymphoma and 22 were done for assessment of relapsed disease. Of the 93 FNA attempts at initial diagnosis, only 27 (29%) were given a specific and complete histologic diagnosis using an accepted classification system (Working Formulation, Revised European-American Classification of Lymphoid Neoplasms, WHO). For the 22 FNAs done for recurrent disease, only nine (41%) were classified using an accepted system. Sixty-seven (72%) of the 93 FNAs performed for the evaluation of initial disease had subsequent excisional biopsies. Among these paired comparisons, only eight (12%) of 67 FNA diagnoses were correlated with the subsequent excisional biopsy diagnosis. Immunophenotyping was completed on 24 of the 67 paired FNAs. Seven of the 24 FNAs with immunophenotyping (29%) were correlated with subsequent histology on excisional biopsy. Only one (2%) of 43 FNA diagnoses, based on morphology alone, was correlated with subsequent excisional biopsy diagnosis.

CONCLUSION: Overall, FNA for lymphoma diagnosis is not helpful, not cost effective, and in addition may misguide treatment.

Supported in part by a grant from Rita Golding in memory of Melville Golding.

Preliminary data presented in both poster and abstract form at the 2003 Conference of the American Society of Hematology, San Diego, CA, December 6-9, 2003 (abstract 1436).

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
P. McLaughlin
A Look in the Mirror
J. Clin. Oncol., March 10, 2009; 27(8): 1158 - 1159.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
L Venkatraman, M A Catherwood, A Patterson, T F Lioe, W G McCluggage, and N H Anderson
Role of polymerase chain reaction and immunocytochemistry in the cytological assessment of lymphoid proliferations
J. Clin. Pathol., November 1, 2006; 59(11): 1160 - 1165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R. M. Austin, G. G. Birdsong, M. K. Sidawy, D. B. Kaminsky, American Society of Cytopathology Executive Board, B. D. Benstein, E. S. Cibas, D. R. Mody, B. J. Guidos, A. T. Moriarty, et al.
Fine Needle Aspiration Is a Feasible and Accurate Technique in the Diagnosis of Lymphoma
J. Clin. Oncol., December 10, 2005; 23(35): 9029 - 9030.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
J. O. Armitage
Staging Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
CA Cancer J Clin, November 1, 2005; 55(6): 368 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
S. M. Ansell and J. Armitage
Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Diagnosis and Treatment
Mayo Clin. Proc., August 1, 2005; 80(8): 1087 - 1097.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
G Kocjan
BEST PRACTICE No 185 Cytological and molecular diagnosis of lymphoma
J. Clin. Pathol., June 1, 2005; 58(6): 561 - 567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online