Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 22, No 15 (August 1), 2004: pp. 3113-3119
© 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.04.170

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moore, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Rocereto, T. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moore, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Rocereto, T. F.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Cervical Cancer
Hazardous Substances DB
*CIS-DIAMINEDICHLOROPLATINUM
*PLATINUM COMPOUNDS
*TAXOL
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Correspondence
Right arrowRelated Reply
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Phase III Study of Cisplatin With or Without Paclitaxel in Stage IVB, Recurrent, or Persistent Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study

David H. Moore, John A. Blessing, Richard P. McQuellon, Howard T. Thaler, David Cella, Jo Benda, David S. Miller, George Olt, Stephanie King, John F. Boggess, Thomas F. Rocereto

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Gynecologic Oncology Group Statistical and Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Institute for Health Services Research and Policy Studies, Northwestern University; Center on Outcomes, Research and Education, Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, Evanston, IL; Department of Pathology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Gynecology, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center/Pennsylvania State University School of Medicine, Hershey; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; and Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School at Camden, Camden, NJ

Address reprint requests to David H. Moore, MD, Indiana University School of Medicine, 3535 Barnhill Dr, RT433, Indianapolis, IN 46202-5274; e-mail: dhmoore{at}uipui.edu

PURPOSE: To determine whether cisplatin plus paclitaxel (C+P) improved response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), or survival compared with cisplatin alone in patients with stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients with measurable disease, performance status (PS) 0 to 2, and adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function received either cisplatin 50 mg/m2 or C+P (cisplatin 50 mg/m2 plus paclitaxel 135 mg/m2) every 3 weeks for six cycles. Tumor measurements and quality-of-life (QOL) assessments were obtained before each treatment cycle.

RESULTS: Of 280 patients entered, 6% were ineligible. Among 264 eligible patients, 134 received cisplatin and 130 received C+P. Groups were well matched with respect to age, ethnicity, PS, tumor grade, disease site, and number of cycles received. The majority of all patients had prior radiation therapy (cisplatin, 92%; C+P, 91%). Objective responses occurred in 19% (6% complete plus 13% partial) of patients receiving cisplatin versus 36% (15% complete plus 21% partial) receiving C+P (P = .002). The median PFS was 2.8 and 4.8 months, respectively, for cisplatin versus C+P (P < .001). There was no difference in median survival (8.8 months v 9.7 months). Grade 3 to 4 anemia and neutropenia were more common in the combination arm. There was no significant difference in QOL scores, although a disproportionate number of patients (cisplatin, n= 50; C+P, n = 33) dropped out of the QOL component, presumably because of increasing disease, deteriorating health status, or early death.

CONCLUSION: C+P is superior to cisplatin alone with respect to response rate and PFS with sustained QOL.

Supported by National Cancer Institute grants of the Gynecologic Oncology Group Administrative Office (grant No. CA 27469) and the Gynecologic Oncology Group Statistical and Data Cancer (grant No. CA 37517).

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Correspondence

  • Optimal Therapy for Relapsed Carcinoma of the Cervix After Primary Chemoradiation
    Max Mano and Janet Kerr
    JCO 2004 22: 5021-5022 [Full Text]

Related Reply

  • In Reply:
    David H. Moore
    JCO 2004 22: 5022 [Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
I. Saito, R. Kitagawa, H. Fukuda, T. Shibata, N. Katsumata, I. Konishi, H. Yoshikawa, and T. Kamura
A Phase III Trial of Paclitaxel plus Carboplatin Versus Paclitaxel plus Cisplatin in Stage IVB, Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer: Gynecologic Cancer Study Group/Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG0505)
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., October 12, 2009; (2009) hyp117v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
B. J. Monk, M. W. Sill, D. S. McMeekin, D. E. Cohn, L. M. Ramondetta, C. H. Boardman, J. Benda, and D. Cella
Phase III Trial of Four Cisplatin-Containing Doublet Combinations in Stage IVB, Recurrent, or Persistent Cervical Carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study
J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2009; 27(28): 4649 - 4655.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
P. O. Witteveen, J. van der Velden, I. Vergote, C. Guerra, C. Scarabeli, C. Coens, G. Demonty, and N. Reed
Phase II study on paclitaxel in patients with recurrent, metastatic or locally advanced vulvar cancer not amenable to surgery or radiotherapy: a study of the EORTC-GCG (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer--Gynaecological Cancer Group)
Ann. Onc., September 1, 2009; 20(9): 1511 - 1516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
G. Mountzios, M. A. Dimopoulos, A. Bamias, G. Vourli, H. Kalofonos, G. Aravantinos, G. Fountzilas, and C. A. Papadimitriou
Randomized multicenter phase II trial of cisplatin and ifosfamide with or without paclitaxel in recurrent or metastatic carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) study
Ann. Onc., August 1, 2009; 20(8): 1362 - 1368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
D. Lorusso, G. Ferrandina, S. Pignata, M. Ludovisi, R. Vigano, S. Scalone, P. Scollo, E. Breda, A. Pietragalla, and G. Scambia
Evaluation of pemetrexed (Alimta, LY231514) as second-line chemotherapy in persistent or recurrent carcinoma of the cervix: the CERVIX 1 study of the MITO (Multicentre Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer and Gynecologic Malignancies) Group
Ann. Onc., July 15, 2009; (2009) mdp266v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
E. L. Nelson, L. B. Wenzel, K. Osann, A. Dogan-Ates, N. Chantana, A. Reina-Patton, A. K. Laust, K. P. Nishimoto, A. Chicz-DeMet, N. du Pont, et al.
Stress, Immunity, and Cervical Cancer: Biobehavioral Outcomes of a Randomized Clinical Trail
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2008; 14(7): 2111 - 2118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
H. J. Long III, N. N. I. Laack, and B. S. Gostout
Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Cervical Cancer
Mayo Clin. Proc., December 1, 2007; 82(12): 1566 - 1574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
H. J. Long III
Management of Metastatic Cervical Cancer: Review of the Literature
J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2007; 25(20): 2966 - 2974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
I. van Luijk, C Coens, M. van der Burg, A Kobierska, M Namer, C Lhomme, P Zola, G Zanetta, J. Vermorken, and For the Gynecological Cancer Group of the European
Phase II study of bleomycin, vindesine, mitomycin C and cisplatin (BEMP) in recurrent or disseminated squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix
Ann. Onc., February 1, 2007; 18(2): 275 - 281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
B. J. Monk, H. Q. Huang, D. Cella, and H. J. Long III
Quality of Life Outcomes From a Randomized Phase III Trial of Cisplatin With or Without Topotecan in Advanced Carcinoma of the Cervix: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study
J. Clin. Oncol., July 20, 2005; 23(21): 4617 - 4625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
H. J. Long III, B. N. Bundy, E. C. Grendys Jr, J. A. Benda, D. S. McMeekin, J. Sorosky, D. S. Miller, L. A. Eaton, and J. V. Fiorica
Randomized Phase III Trial of Cisplatin With or Without Topotecan in Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study
J. Clin. Oncol., July 20, 2005; 23(21): 4626 - 4633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Mano and J. Kerr
Optimal Therapy for Relapsed Carcinoma of the Cervix After Primary Chemoradiation
J. Clin. Oncol., December 15, 2004; 22(24): 5021 - 5022.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
D. H. Moore
In Reply:
J. Clin. Oncol., December 15, 2004; 22(24): 5022 - 5022.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online