Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 22, No 17 (September 1), 2004: pp. 3593-3607
© 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.10.216
Receptor Imaging in Oncology by Means of Nuclear Medicine: Current Status
Bieke Van Den Bossche,
Christophe Van de Wiele
From the Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
Address reprint requests to Christophe Van de Wiele, MD, PhD, University Hospital Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, 9000-B Ghent, Belgium; e-mail: christophe.vandewiele{at}ugent.be
To date, our understanding of the role of receptors and their cognate ligands in cancer is being successfully translated into the design and development of an arsenal of new, less toxic, and more specific anticancer drugs. Because most of these novel drugs are cytostatic, objective response as measured by morphologic imaging modalities (eg, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging) cannot be used as a surrogate marker for drug development or for clinical decision making. Positron emission tomography (PET) can be used to image and quantify the in vivo distribution of positron-emitting radioisotopes such as oxygen-15, carbon-11, and fluorine-18 that can be substituted or added into biologically relevant and specific receptor radioligands. Similarly, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) can be used to image and quantify the in vivo distribution of receptor targeting compounds labeled with indium-111, technetium-99m, and iodine-123. By virtue of their whole-body imaging capacity and the absence of errors of sampling and tissue manipulation as well as preparation, both techniques have the potential to address locoregional receptor status noninvasively and repetitively. This article reviews available data on the in vivo evaluation of receptor systems by means of PET or SPECT for identifying and monitoring patients with sufficient receptor overexpression for tailored therapeutic interventions, and also for depicting tumor tissue and determining the currently largely unknown heterogeneity in receptor expression among different tumor lesions within and between patients.
Authors disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P S MURPHY, T J McCARTHY, and A S K DZIK-JURASZ
The role of clinical imaging in oncological drug development
Br. J. Radiol.,
September 1, 2008;
81(969):
685 - 692.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. J. Murgo, S. Kummar, L. Rubinstein, M. Gutierrez, J. Collins, R. Kinders, R. E. Parchment, J. Ji, S. M. Steinberg, S. X. Yang, et al.
Designing Phase 0 Cancer Clinical Trials
Clin. Cancer Res.,
June 15, 2008;
14(12):
3675 - 3682.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. E Burdette
In vivo imaging of molecular targets and their function in endocrinology
J. Mol. Endocrinol.,
June 1, 2008;
40(6):
253 - 261.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Scopinaro, G. De Vincentis, and A. D. Varvarigou
Use of Radiolabeled Bombesin in Humans
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 1, 2005;
23(13):
3170 - 3171.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|