Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2004.12.015 on August 9 2004
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 22, No 18 (September 15), 2004: pp. 3668-3676
© 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Thin Primary Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma: A Prognostic Tree for 10-Year Metastasis Is More Accurate Than American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging
Phyllis A. Gimotty,
DuPont Guerry,
Michael E. Ming,
Rosalie Elenitsas,
Xiaowei Xu,
Brian Czerniecki,
Francis Spitz,
Lynn Schuchter,
David Elder
From the Melanoma Program of the Abramson Cancer Center, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Department of Dermatology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
Address reprint requests to Phyllis A. Gimotty, PhD, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, 631 Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Dr, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6021; e-mail: pgimotty{at}cceb.upenn.edu
PURPOSE: The majority of invasive primary melanomas are thin ( 1.00 mm). Since the current staging system imperfectly predicts outcome in patients with such lesions, we sought to develop a more effective classification scheme to better identify both patients at high risk of metastasis who are candidates for further staging and therapy and those with little risk.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective cohort study included 884 patients who had thin invasive melanomas. A tree-structured analysis of 10-year metastasis was used to develop a new classification scheme.
RESULTS: The overall 10-year metastasis rate was 6.5% (95% CI, 4.8% to 8.1%). The prognostic tree defined four risk groups: high-risk: men with vertical growth phase (VGP) lesions that had mitotic rates (MRs) greater than 0, and for whom the 10-year metastasis rate was 31% (22% to 42%; n = 90); moderate-risk: women with VGP lesions that had MRs greater than 0 and for whom the rate was 13% (9% to 18%; n = 136); low-risk: patients with VGP lesions that had MR of 0 for whom the rate was 4% (2% to 7%; n = 247); and minimal-risk: patients with invasive lesions without VGP for whom the rate was 0.5% (0% to 1.2%; n = 411). Survival curves differed significantly among the four groups (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Growth phase, mitotic rate, and sex are important prognostic factors for patients with thin melanomas, and they identify subgroups at substantial risk for metastasis. After validation in other populations, the proposed prognostic tree will be useful in the design of clinical trials and clinical management.
Supported in part by the following grants: Prediction and Modification of Melanoma Risk (CA-75434; D.G.) and SPORE on Skin Cancer (CA-093372; Meenhard Herlyn, principal investigator).
Presented in part at the 38th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Orlando, FL, May 18-21, 2002.
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
Related Article
- Prognostic Factors of Thin Cutaneous Melanoma: An Analysis of the Central Malignant Melanoma Registry of the German Dermatological Society
Ulrike Leiter, Petra G. Buettner, Thomas K. Eigentler, and Claus Garbe
JCO 2004 22: 3660-3667
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
Related Editorial
- Thin Melanoma: Still "Excellent Prognosis" Disease?
A.C. Halpern and A.A. Marghoob
JCO 2004 22: 3651-3653
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Zivanovic, M. M. Leitao, A. Iasonos, L. M. Jacks, Q. Zhou, N. R. Abu-Rustum, R. A. Soslow, M. M. Juretzka, D. S. Chi, R. R. Barakat, et al.
Stage-Specific Outcomes of Patients With Uterine Leiomyosarcoma: A Comparison of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics and American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Systems
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 20, 2009;
27(12):
2066 - 2072.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. E. G. Rothberg, M. B. Bracken, and D. L. Rimm
Tissue Biomarkers for Prognosis in Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
J Natl Cancer Inst,
April 1, 2009;
101(7):
452 - 474.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. D. Da Forno, J. H. Pringle, P. Hutchinson, J. Osborn, Q. Huang, L. Potter, R. A. Hancox, A. Fletcher, and G. S. Saldanha
WNT5A Expression Increases during Melanoma Progression and Correlates with Outcome
Clin. Cancer Res.,
September 15, 2008;
14(18):
5825 - 5832.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. E. Wright, R. P. Scheri, X. Ye, M. B. Faries, R. R. Turner, R. Essner, and D. L. Morton
Importance of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients With Thin Melanoma
Arch Surg,
September 1, 2008;
143(9):
892 - 900.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M G Cook and S Di Palma
Pathology of sentinel lymph nodes for melanoma
J. Clin. Pathol.,
August 1, 2008;
61(8):
897 - 902.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. C. Karakousis, P. A. Gimotty, B. J. Czerniecki, D. E. Elder, R. Elenitsas, M. E. Ming, D. L. Fraker, D. Guerry, and F. R. Spitz
Regional Nodal Metastatic Disease Is the Strongest Predictor of Survival in Patients with Thin Vertical Growth Phase Melanomas: A Case for SLN Staging Biopsy in These Patients
Ann. Surg. Oncol.,
May 1, 2007;
14(5):
1596 - 1603.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. N. Markovic, L. A. Erickson, R. D. Rao, R. H. Weenig, B. A. Pockaj, A. Bardia, C. M. Vachon, S. E. Schild, R. R. McWilliams, J. L. Hand, et al.
Malignant Melanoma in the 21st Century, Part 2: Staging, Prognosis, and Treatment
Mayo Clin. Proc.,
April 1, 2007;
82(4):
490 - 513.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. A. Gimotty, D. E. Elder, D. L. Fraker, J. Botbyl, K. Sellers, R. Elenitsas, M. E. Ming, L. Schuchter, F. R. Spitz, B. J. Czerniecki, et al.
Identification of High-Risk Patients Among Those Diagnosed With Thin Cutaneous Melanomas
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 20, 2007;
25(9):
1129 - 1134.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. R. Fears, D. Guerry IV, R. M. Pfeiffer, R. W. Sagebiel, D. E. Elder, A. Halpern, E. A. Holly, P. Hartge, and M. A. Tucker
Identifying Individuals at High Risk of Melanoma: A Practical Predictor of Absolute Risk
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 1, 2006;
24(22):
3590 - 3596.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. C. Karakousis, P. A. Gimotty, J. D. Botbyl, S. B. Kesmodel, D. E. Elder, R. Elenitsas, M. E. Ming, D. Guerry, D. L. Fraker, B. J. Czerniecki, et al.
Predictors of Regional Nodal Disease in Patients With Thin Melanomas
Ann. Surg. Oncol.,
April 1, 2006;
13(4):
533 - 541.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. I. Ross
Early-stage melanoma: staging criteria and prognostic modeling.
Clin. Cancer Res.,
April 1, 2006;
12(7):
2312s - 2319s.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Vaquerano, W. G. Kraybill, D. L. Driscoll, R. Cheney, and J. M. Kane III
American Joint Committee on Cancer Clinical Stage as a Selection Criterion for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Thin Melanoma
Ann. Surg. Oncol.,
February 1, 2006;
13(2):
198 - 204.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. A. Gimotty, P. Van Belle, D. E. Elder, T. Murry, K. T. Montone, X. Xu, S. Hotz, S. Raines, M. E. Ming, P. Wahl, et al.
Biologic and Prognostic Significance of Dermal Ki67 Expression, Mitoses, and Tumorigenicity in Thin Invasive Cutaneous Melanoma
J. Clin. Oncol.,
November 1, 2005;
23(31):
8048 - 8056.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. A. Gimotty, J. Botbyl, S.-j. Soong, and D. Guerry
A Population-Based Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Melanoma Staging System
J. Clin. Oncol.,
November 1, 2005;
23(31):
8065 - 8075.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. B. Kesmodel, G. C. Karakousis, J. D. Botbyl, R. J. Canter, R. T. Lewis, P. M. Wahl, K. P. Terhune, A. Alavi, D. E. Elder, M. E. Ming, et al.
Mitotic Rate as a Predictor of Sentinel Lymph Node Positivity in Patients With Thin Melanomas
Ann. Surg. Oncol.,
June 1, 2005;
12(6):
449 - 458.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. S. Tyler and C. M. Balch
Nomograms and Staging in Melanoma: New Tools for Better Predicting Outcomes
Ann. Surg. Oncol.,
April 1, 2005;
12(4):
267 - 269.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A.C. Halpern and A.A. Marghoob
Thin Melanoma: Still "Excellent Prognosis" Disease?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 15, 2004;
22(18):
3651 - 3653.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|