Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 22, No 19 (October 1), 2004: pp. 4010-4018
© 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.06.080

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Bock, G.H.
Right arrow Articles by van de Velde, C.J.H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Bock, G.H.
Right arrow Articles by van de Velde, C.J.H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

REVIEW ARTICLE

Effectiveness of Routine Visits and Routine Tests in Detecting Isolated Locoregional Recurrences After Treatment for Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

G.H. de Bock, J. Bonnema, J. van Der Hage, J. Kievit, C.J.H. van de Velde

From the Department of Medical Decision Making, Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands

Address reprint requests to G.H. de Bock, Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands; e-mail: G.H.de_Bock{at}LUMC.NL

PURPOSE: To review the effectiveness of routine visits and routine tests in detecting isolated locoregional recurrences in asymptomatic patients after treatment for early-stage invasive breast cancer.

METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis. The proportion of isolated locoregional recurrences diagnosed during routine visits or routine tests in asymptomatic patients was compared with the proportion of isolated locoregional recurrences in symptomatic patients.

RESULTS: Twelve studies that involved a total of 5,045 patients and 378 isolated locoregional recurrences were identified. Pooling data showed an overall estimate of 40% of isolated locoregional recurrences diagnosed during routine visits or routine tests in asymptomatic patients (95% CI, 35 to 45). Of these, 47% (95% CI, 39 to 54) were diagnosed after mastectomy, and 36% (95% CI, 28 to 43) were diagnosed after breast-conserving therapy (relative risk, 1.327; 95% CI, 1.014 to 1.738). Apart from differences in therapy, we have not been able to discern subgroups of patients for whom results were different.

CONCLUSION: Approximately 40% of isolated locoregional recurrences are diagnosed during routine visits and routine tests in asymptomatic patients treated for early-stage invasive breast cancer. We could not assess whether these were detected by either physical examination or other tests, nor if the detection of asymptomatic isolated recurrences had any influence on potential for cure or quality of life. As the overall quality of the included studies and the overall incidence of isolated locoregional recurrences are low, this systematic review highlights the need for prospective comparative studies on cost-effective strategies for the follow-up of patients after a diagnosis of breast cancer.

Authors’ disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
N. Houssami, S. Ciatto, F. Martinelli, R. Bonardi, and S. W. Duffy
Early detection of second breast cancers improves prognosis in breast cancer survivors
Ann. Onc., March 17, 2009; (2009) mdp037v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. L. Khatcheressian, A. C. Wolff, T. J. Smith, E. Grunfeld, H. B. Muss, V. G. Vogel, F. Halberg, M. R. Somerfield, and N. E. Davidson
American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 Update of the Breast Cancer Follow-Up and Management Guidelines in the Adjuvant Setting
J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2006; 24(31): 5091 - 5097.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. A. Hayden, P. Cote, and C. Bombardier
Evaluation of the quality of prognosis studies in systematic reviews.
Ann Intern Med, March 21, 2006; 144(6): 427 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online