Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2004.03.129 on December 9 2003
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 22, No 2 (January 15), 2004: pp. 238-243
© 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Phase I Trial Using a Time-to-Event Continual Reassessment Strategy for Dose Escalation of Cisplatin Combined With Gemcitabine and Radiation Therapy in Pancreatic Cancer
Jeffrey H. Muler,
Cornelius J. McGinn,
Daniel Normolle,
Theodore Lawrence,
Diane Brown,
Gwen Hejna,
Mark M. Zalupski
From the Departments of Internal Medicine and Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Address reprint requests to Mark M. Zalupski, MD, University of Michigan Medical Center, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, CCGC 3-219, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0934; e-mail: Zalupski{at}umich.edu.
PURPOSE: The primary objective of this study was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose of cisplatin that could be added to full-dose gemcitabine and radiation therapy (RT) in patients with pancreatic cancer.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients were treated. Gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 was administered over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Cisplatin followed gemcitabine on days 1 and 15. The initial dose level of cisplatin was 30 mg/m2, escalated to a targeted dose of 50 mg/m2 using Time-to-Event Continual Reassessment Method. RT was initiated on cycle 1, day 1, in 2.4 Gy fractions to a total dose of 36 Gy. A second cycle of chemotherapy was planned following a 1-week rest.
RESULTS: Four of eight patients experienced acute dose limiting toxicity at the 50 mg/m2 cisplatin dose level. Patients treated at 30 and 40 mg/m2 cisplatin dose level tolerated therapy without dose-limiting toxicity. Median survival was 10.7 months (95% CI, 5.4 to 18.2) for all patients, and 12.9 months (95% CI, 7.4 to 21.2) for those without metastasis.
CONCLUSION: Cisplatin at doses up to 40 mg/m2 may be safely added to full-dose gemcitabine and conformal RT. The Time-to-Event Continual Reassessment Method trial design allowed rapid completion of the study and confidence in the conclusion about the maximum tolerated dose, but accrued more patients to a dose level above the maximum tolerated dose than the typical phase I design. Local and systemic disease control and survival in this study cohort supports further investigation of gemcitabine-based RT and combination chemotherapy in this disease.
Supported in part by Eli Lilly and Co, Indianapolis, IN.
Presented in part at the 37th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, San Francisco, CA, May 12-15, 2001.
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
Related Editorial
- Phase I's, Photons, and Philosophies: New Tactics for Exploratory Clinical Trials of Concurrent Chemoradiation
Mitchell Machtay
JCO 2004 22: 214-216
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Le Tourneau, J. J. Lee, and L. L. Siu
Dose Escalation Methods in Phase I Cancer Clinical Trials
J Natl Cancer Inst,
May 20, 2009;
101(10):
708 - 720.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Morgan, L. A. Parsels, J. Maybaum, and T. S. Lawrence
Improving Gemcitabine-Mediated Radiosensitization Using Molecularly Targeted Therapy: A Review
Clin. Cancer Res.,
November 1, 2008;
14(21):
6744 - 6750.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Morgan, L. A. Parsels, L. E. Kollar, D. P. Normolle, J. Maybaum, and T. S. Lawrence
The Combination of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors with Gemcitabine and Radiation in Pancreatic Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res.,
August 15, 2008;
14(16):
5142 - 5149.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Ben-Josef, T. S. Lawrence, and M. M. Zalupski
Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 20, 2007;
25(30):
4861 - 4861.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. P. Desai, E. Ben-Josef, D. P. Normolle, I. R. Francis, J. K. Greenson, D. M. Simeone, A. E. Chang, L. M. Colletti, T. S. Lawrence, and M. M. Zalupski
Phase I Study of Oxaliplatin, Full-Dose Gemcitabine, and Concurrent Radiation Therapy in Pancreatic Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 10, 2007;
25(29):
4587 - 4592.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. G. Maki, J. K. Wathen, S. R. Patel, D. A. Priebat, S. H. Okuno, B. Samuels, M. Fanucchi, D. C. Harmon, S. M. Schuetze, D. Reinke, et al.
Randomized Phase II Study of Gemcitabine and Docetaxel Compared With Gemcitabine Alone in Patients With Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Results of Sarcoma Alliance for Research Through Collaboration Study 002
J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 1, 2007;
25(19):
2755 - 2763.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Normolle and T. Lawrence
Designing Dose-Escalation Trials With Late-Onset Toxicities Using the Time-to-Event Continual Reassessment Method
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 20, 2006;
24(27):
4426 - 4433.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Pauwels, A. E.C. Korst, F. Lardon, and J. B. Vermorken
Combined Modality Therapy of Gemcitabine and Radiation
Oncologist,
January 1, 2005;
10(1):
34 - 51.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Machtay
Phase I's, Photons, and Philosophies: New Tactics for Exploratory Clinical Trials of Concurrent Chemoradiation
J. Clin. Oncol.,
January 15, 2004;
22(2):
214 - 216.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|