|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 22, No 2 (January 15), 2004: pp. 286-292 © 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.07.112 BRAF Gene Is Somatically Mutated but Does Not Make a Major Contribution to Malignant Melanoma Susceptibility: The Italian Melanoma Intergroup StudyFrom the Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare-Sezione di Sassari, CNR, Alghero; Istituto di Anatomia Patologica, Università di Sassari, Sassari; Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli; Dipartimento di Oncologia, Biologia e Genetica, Università di Genova, Genova; Biologia Molecolare e Cellulare, Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata, IRCCS, Rome; Centro di Osservazione Epidemiologica Multizonale, Azienda USL1, Sassari, Italy; and the Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom Address reprint requests to Giuseppe Palmieri, MD, Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare-Sezione di Sassari, CNR, Località Tramariglio-Alghero, 07040 Santa Maria La Palma (Sassari), Italy; e-mail:gpalmieri{at}yahoo.com PURPOSE: Oncogenic activation of the BRAF gene has been demonstrated to be involved in the pathogenesis of malignant melanoma (MM). In this study, we investigated the contribution of BRAF to melanoma susceptibility, also making a comparison with frequency of CDKN2A germline mutations in MM patients from different areas in Italy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using a combination of denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography analysis and automated sequencing on genomic DNA from peripheral blood or tumor tissue samples, 569 MM patients (211 from northern Italy and 358 from southern Italy) were screened for BRAF mutations. RESULTS: Three BRAF germline sequence variants (M116R, V599E, and G608H) were identified in four (0.7%) of 569 MM patients. The most common BRAF mutation, V599E, was detected in one germline DNA sample only; M116R and G608H were newly described mutations. A high frequency (59%) of BRAF mutations was instead observed in tumor samples from patients also undergoing germline DNA analysis; at the somatic level, substitution of valine 599 was found to account for the majority (88%) of BRAF mutations. We then estimated the germline mutation rates in BRAF and CDKN2A among 358 consecutively collected patient samples originating in southern Italy; a low (2.5%) or very low (0.29%) prevalence of CDKN2A and BRAF mutations, respectively, was detected. CONCLUSION: Mutation analysis of either blood DNA from a large collection of MM patients or matched MM tissues from a subset of such patients revealed that BRAF is somatically mutated and does not play a major role in melanoma susceptibility. The present study further suggests that patient origin may account for different mutation rates in candidate genes. Supported by Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro, Ricerca Finalizzata Ministero della Salute (F.S.N.), and Regione Autonoma della Sardegna Progetto Genetica e Tumori nel Nord Sardegna. Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|