This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Save to my personal folders Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Madersbacher, S. Articles by Studer, U. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Madersbacher, S. Articles by Studer, U. E. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

Is Eligibility for a Chemotherapy Protocol a Good Prognostic Factor for Invasive Bladder Cancer After Radical Cystectomy?

From the Department of Urology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

Address reprint requests to Stephan Madersbacher, MD, FEBU, Associate Professor, Department of Urology, Inselspital, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland; e-mail: urs.studer{at}insel.ch

PURPOSE: To assess whether eligibility to an adjuvant chemotherapy protocol in itself represents a good prognostic factor after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between April 1984 and May 1989, our institution entered 35 patients with invasive bladder cancer into the Swiss Group for Clinical and Epidemiological Cancer Research (SAKK) study 09/84. They were randomly assigned to either observation or three postoperative courses of cisplatin monotherapy after cystectomy. This study had a negative result. The outcome of these 35 patients (protocol group) was compared with an age- and tumor-stage–matched cohort (matched group; n = 35) who also underwent cystectomy during the same period, but were not entered into the SAKK study, as well as the remaining 57 patients treated during the study period for the same indication (remaining group).

RESULTS: Median overall survival decreased from 76.3 months in the protocol group to 52.1 months in the matched group and to 20.3 months in the remaining group. The respective times of median recurrence-free survival were 67.2, 16.0, and 9.4 months. Tumor progression occurred in 46% of the protocol group compared with 69% in the matched group and 65% in the remaining group (P < .05). Cancer-related death was noted in 40% of the protocol group, 57% in the matched group, and 56% in the remaining group.

CONCLUSION: These data suggest that being willing and fit enough for a chemotherapy protocol is a good prognostic factor for invasive bladder cancer. This eligibility bias emphasizes the need for prospective, randomized trials, and indicates that single-group studies using historical or matched controls have to be interpreted with caution.

Presented at the 27th Congress of the European Association of Urology, Birmingham, UK, February 23-26, 2002.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. M. Cohen, A. Goel, J. Phillips, R. D. Ennis, and M. L. Grossbard The Role of Perioperative Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Urothelial Cancer Oncologist, June 1, 2006; 11(6): 630 - 640. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]