Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 22, No 21 (November 1), 2004: pp. 4312-4318
© 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.01.187
Why Cancer Patients Enter Randomized Clinical Trials: Exploring the Factors That Influence Their Decision
James R. Wright,
Timothy J. Whelan,
Susan Schiff,
Sacha Dubois,
Dauna Crooks,
Patricia T. Haines,
Diane DeRosa,
Robin S. Roberts,
Amiram Gafni,
Kathleen Pritchard,
Mark N. Levine
From the Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences; Department of Medicine, Supportive Care Cancer Research Unit, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton; Department of Nursing, Hospital for Sick Children; Sunnybrook and Women's College Hospital; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
Address reprint requests to J.R. Wright, MD, FRCP(C), Juravinski Cancer Centre, 699 Concession St, Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 5C2; e-mail: jim.wright{at}hrcc.on.ca
PURPOSE: Few interventions have been designed and tested to improve recruitment to clinical trials in oncology. The multiple factors influencing patients' decisions have made the prioritization of specific interventions challenging. The present study was undertaken to identify the independent predictors of a cancer patient's decision to enter a randomized clinical trial.
METHODS: A list of factors from the medical literature was augmented with a series of focus groups involving cancer patients, physicians, and clinical research associates (CRAs). A series of questionnaires was developed with items based on these factors and were administered concurrently to 189 cancer patients, their physicians, and CRAs following the patient's decision regarding trial entry. Forward logistic regression modeling was performed using the items significantly correlated (by univariate analysis) with the decision to enter a clinical trial.
RESULTS: A number of items were significantly correlated with the patient's decision. In the multivariate logistic regression model, the patient's perception of personal benefit was the most important, with an odds ratio (OR) of 3.08 (P < .05). CRA-related items involving supportive aspects of the decision-making process were also important. These included whether the CRA helped with the decision (OR = 1.71; P < .05), and whether the decision was hard for the patient to make (OR = 0.52; P < .05).
CONCLUSION: Strategies that better address the potential benefits of trial entry may result in improved accrual. Interventions or aids that focus on the supportive aspects of the decision-making process while respecting the need for information and patient autonomy may also lead to meaningful improvements in accrual.
Supported by a grant from the Hamilton Regional Cancer Centre Foundation.
Presented in part at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Chicago, IL, May 31-June 3, 2003, and at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Association of Radiation Oncologists in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, October 3-5, 2003.
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Read, C. V. Fernandez, J. Gao, C. Strahlendorf, A. Moghrabi, R. D. Pentz, R. C. Barfield, J. N. Baker, D. Santor, C. Weijer, et al.
Decision-making by Adolescents and Parents of Children With Cancer Regarding Health Research Participation
Pediatrics,
September 1, 2009;
124(3):
959 - 965.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Peppercorn
Off-protocol Therapy in Oncology
ASCO Educational Book,
January 1, 2009;
2009(1):
177 - 181.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Peppercorn, H. Burstein, F. G. Miller, E. Winer, and S. Joffe
Self-Reported Practices and Attitudes of US Oncologists Regarding Off-Protocol Therapy
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 20, 2008;
26(36):
5994 - 6000.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Biasoli, P. Franchi-Rezgui, D. Sibon, J. Briere, E. de Kerviler, C. Thieblemont, V. Levy, C. Gisselbrecht, and P. Brice
Analysis of factors influencing inclusion of 102 patients with stage III/IV Hodgkin's lymphoma in a randomized trial for first-line chemotherapy
Ann. Onc.,
November 1, 2008;
19(11):
1915 - 1920.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. L. Albrecht, S. S. Eggly, M. E.J. Gleason, F. W.K. Harper, T. S. Foster, A. M. Peterson, H. Orom, L. A. Penner, and J. C. Ruckdeschel
Influence of Clinical Communication on Patients' Decision Making on Participation in Clinical Trials
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 1, 2008;
26(16):
2666 - 2673.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. L. Ding, N. R. Powe, J. E. Manson, N. S. Sherber, and J. B. Braunstein
Sex Differences in Perceived Risks, Distrust, and Willingness to Participate in Clinical Trials: A Randomized Study of Cardiovascular Prevention Trials
Arch Intern Med,
May 14, 2007;
167(9):
905 - 912.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L Sharp, S C Cotton, L Alexander, E Williams, N M Gray, and J M Reid
Reasons for participation and non-participation in a randomized controlled trial: postal questionnaire surveys of women eligible for TOMBOLA (Trial Of Management of Borderline and Other Low-grade Abnormal smears)
Clinical Trials,
October 1, 2006;
3(5):
431 - 442.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. M. Ford, J. S. Evans, E. M. Stoffel, J. Balmana, M. M. Regan, and S. Syngal
Factors associated with enrollment in cancer genetics research.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.,
July 1, 2006;
15(7):
1355 - 1359.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Harter, A. du Bois, C. Schade-Brittinger, A. Burges, K. Wollschlaeger, M. Gropp, B. Schmalfeldt, J. Huober, A. Staehle, J. Pfisterer, et al.
Non-enrolment of ovarian cancer patients in clinical trials: reasons and background
Ann. Onc.,
November 1, 2005;
16(11):
1801 - 1805.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. A. Townsley, R. Selby, and L. L. Siu
Systematic Review of Barriers to the Recruitment of Older Patients With Cancer Onto Clinical Trials
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 1, 2005;
23(13):
3112 - 3124.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|