This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Save to my personal folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sparano, J. A. Articles by Davidson, N. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sparano, J. A. Articles by Davidson, N. E.

Randomized Phase III Trial of Marimastat Versus Placebo in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Who Have Responding or Stable Disease After First-Line Chemotherapy: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial E2196

From the Albert Einstein Cancer Center, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx; State University Hospital of New York, Stony Brook, NY; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and the Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

Address reprint requests to Joseph A. Sparano, MD, Albert Einstein Cancer Center, Montefiore Medical Center, Weiler Division, 1825 Eastchester Rd, 2 South, Rm 47-48, Bronx, NY 10461; e-mail: Sparano{at}jimmy.harvard.edu

PURPOSE: To determine whether a matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor improves progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic breast cancer who have responding or stable disease after first-line chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred seventy-nine eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive oral marimastat (10 mg bid; n = 114) or a placebo (n = 65) within 3 to 6 weeks of completing six to eight cycles of first-line doxorubicin- and/or taxane-containing chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Patients were evaluated every 3 months until disease progression.

RESULTS: When comparing placebo with marimastat, there was no significant difference in PFS (median, 3.1 months v 4.7 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.74; P = .16) or overall survival (median, 26.6 months v 24.7 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.46; P = .86). Patients treated with marimastat were more likely to develop grade 2 or 3 musculoskeletal toxicity (MST), a known complication of the drug indicative of achieving a biologic effect, compared with patients administered placebo (63% v 22%, respectively; P < .0001). Patients with grade 2 or 3 MST had significantly inferior survival compared with patients who had grade 0 or 1 MST (median, 22.5 months v 28.2 months; P = .04). In addition, patients who had a marimastat plasma concentration of at least 10 ng/mL at month 1 and/or 3 were significantly more likely to have grade 2 to 3 MST (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION: Marimastat does not prolong PFS when used after first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Patients with higher marimastat levels exhibited MST, and MST was associated with inferior survival.

Conducted by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (Robert L. Comis, MD, Chair) and supported in part by Public Health Service grant Nos. CA23318, CA66636, CA21115, CA14958, CA17145, CA13650, and CA16116, and the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health; and Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD.

Presented in part at the 38th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Orlando, FL, May 18-21, 2002, and at the American Society of Clinical Oncology Molecular Therapeutics Symposium, San Diego, CA, November 8-10, 2002.

The contents of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Cancer Institute.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. A. Eisenhauer and R. H. El-Maraghi In Reply J. Clin. Oncol., July 20, 2008; 26(21): 3654 - 3655. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. Wood and R. A. Stockley Editorial: Unifying the genetics, co-morbidities and management of COPD Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease, June 1, 2008; 2(3): 113 - 117. [PDF]

				C. K. Daugherty, M. J. Ratain, E. J. Emanuel, A. T. Farrell, and R. L. Schilsky Ethical, Scientific, and Regulatory Perspectives Regarding the Use of Placebos in Cancer Clinical Trials J. Clin. Oncol., March 10, 2008; 26(8): 1371 - 1378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Findlay, G. von Minckwitz, and A. Wardley Effective oral chemotherapy for breast cancer: pillars of strength Ann. Onc., February 1, 2008; 19(2): 212 - 222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. L. Schilsky Target practice: oncology drug development in the era of genomic medicine Clinical Trials, April 1, 2007; 4(2): 163 - 166. [PDF]

				W. M. Stadler The randomized discontinuation trial: a phase II design to assess growth-inhibitory agents Mol. Cancer Ther., April 1, 2007; 6(4): 1180 - 1185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Merchan, J. Tang, G. Hu, Y. Lin, W. Mutter, C. Tong, S. A. Karumanchi, S. J. Russell, and V. P. Sukhatme Protease activity of urokinase and tumor progression in a syngeneic mammary cancer model. J Natl Cancer Inst, June 7, 2006; 98(11): 756 - 764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. T. Peterson The importance of estimating the therapeutic index in the development of matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors Cardiovasc Res, February 15, 2006; 69(3): 677 - 687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]