Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 22, No 23 (December 1), 2004: pp. 4823-4828
© 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.12.056

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glare, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by McMahon, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Glare, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by McMahon, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Diagnostic Accuracy of the Palliative Prognostic Score in Hospitalized Patients With Advanced Cancer

Paul A. Glare, Steffen Eychmueller, Patrick McMahon

From the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia

Address reprint requests to Paul Glare, MD, Department of Palliative Care, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Rd, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia; e-mail: paul{at}email.cs.nsw.gov.au

PURPOSE: To evaluate the predictive accuracy of the Palliative Prognostic (PaP) score in patients with advanced cancer under the care of an oncologist.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: The PaP score was calculated in 100 consecutive patients with advanced cancer hospitalized under the care of a medical or radiation oncologist at a university teaching hospital in Australia. The attending oncologist predicted the survival duration for the purpose of the scoring. The positive predictive value of the PaP score was evaluated. Survival analysis was performed to compare the survival of the three prognostic groups.

RESULTS: Assessable survival data were available for 98 patients. The overall median survival was 12 weeks (interquartile range, 7 to 25 weeks). The PaP score divided the heterogeneous patient sample into three isoprognostic groups related to the chance of surviving 1 month, with 64 patients in group A (> 70% chance), 32 patients in group B (30% to 70% chance), and four patients in group C (< 30% chance). The estimated median survival of the three groups was 17 weeks (95% CI, 12 to 26 weeks), 7 weeks (95% CI, 4 to 12 weeks), and less than 1 week (95% CI, < 1 to 3 weeks), respectively. These survival differences were highly significant (log-rank test of trend, {chi}12 = 25.65; P < .0001). The 1-month survival of the groups was 97%, 59%, and 25%, respectively.

CONCLUSION: When oncologists' survival estimates are used, the PaP score is able to identify accurately three isoprognostic patient groups, irrespective of the cancer type. The PaP score may help reduce the uncertainty of formulating a prognosis in patients with advanced cancer.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Evid Based Complement Alternat MedHome page
A. Sikorskii, G. K. Wyatt, A.-e-A. Siddiqi, and D. Tamkus
Recruitment and Early Retention of Women with Advanced Breast Cancer in a Complementary and Alternative Medicine Trial
Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med., July 20, 2009; (2009) nep051v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
E. Finlay and D. Casarett
Making Difficult Discussions Easier: Using Prognosis to Facilitate Transitions to Hospice
CA Cancer J Clin, July 1, 2009; 59(4): 250 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CAREHome page
M. P. Davis, T. Yavuzsen, D. Khoshknabi, J. Kirkova, D. Walsh, W. Lasheen, R. Lagman, and M. T. Karafa
Bioelectrical Impedance Phase Angle Changes During Hydration and Prognosis in Advanced Cancer
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, June 1, 2009; 26(3): 180 - 187.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. A. Marinella
On the Hippocratic Facies
J. Clin. Oncol., July 20, 2008; 26(21): 3638 - 3640.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. Gripp, S. Moeller, E. Bolke, G. Schmitt, C. Matuschek, S. Asgari, F. Asgharzadeh, S. Roth, W. Budach, M. Franz, et al.
Survival Prediction in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients by Clinical Estimates, Laboratory Tests, and Self-Rated Anxiety and Depression
J. Clin. Oncol., August 1, 2007; 25(22): 3313 - 3320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
P. Stone and S Lund
Predicting prognosis in patients with advanced cancer
Ann. Onc., June 1, 2007; 18(6): 971 - 976.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
B. Aabom, J. Kragstrup, H. Vondeling, L.S. Bakketeig, and H. Stovring
Defining Cancer Patients As Being in the Terminal Phase: Who Receives a Formal Diagnosis, and What Are the Effects?
J. Clin. Oncol., October 20, 2005; 23(30): 7411 - 7416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online