|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 22, No 4 (February 15), 2004: pp. 602-609 © 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.12.034 Individualized Patient Dosing in Phase I Clinical Trials: The Role of Escalation With Overdose Control in PNU-214936From the Departments of Medical Oncology and Biostatistics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA Address reprint requests to André Rogatko, PhD, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 7701 Burholme Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19111; e-mail: a_rogatko@fccc.edu PURPOSE: A patient-specific dose-escalation scheme using a Bayesian model of Escalation with Overdose Control (EWOC) was conducted to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of PNU-214936 in advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PNU-214936 is a murine Fab fragment of the monoclonal antibody 5T4 fused to a mutated superantigen staphylococcal enterotoxin A (SEA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-eight patients with NSCLC were treated with an individualized dose of PNU-214936 calculated using EWOC, based on their anti-SEA antibody level, and given as a 3-hour infusion on 4 consecutive days.
RESULTS: Fever (82%; grade 3 to 4, 2.6%) and hypotension (57%; grade 3 to 4, 9%) were the most common toxicities. Eight dose-limiting toxicities occurred, as defined as any grade 4 toxicity occurring within the first 5 days. The MTD was defined as a function of pretreatment anti-SEA antibody level. MTD ranged from 103 ng/kg for patients with anti-SEA concentrations CONCLUSION: EWOC determined phase I doses of PNU-214936 that were adjusted for patient anti-SEA antibody level, while safeguarding against overdose. Furthermore, the method permitted the construction of a dosing algorithm that would allow patients in subsequent clinical investigations to be treated with a dose of PNU-214936 that is tailored to their specific tolerance for the agent, as reflected by their pretreatment anti-SEA. Supported by grants CA06927 and CA-92769 from the National Cancer Institute, a Tobacco Formula Grant from the State of Pennsylvania, and an appropriation from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|