|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2004.03.036 on February 17 2004 © 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology. Combining Gene Expression Profiles and Clinical Parameters for Risk Stratification in MedulloblastomasFrom the Division of Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Children's Hospital; Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School; Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston; Whitehead Institute/MIT Center of Biomedical Research, MA Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA; and Unidad de Oncologia Pediatrica, Hospital de Cruces-Baracaldo, Basque Country, Spain Address reprint requests to Scott L. Pomeroy, MD, PhD, Department of Neurology, Enders 260, Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston MA 02115; e-mail: scott.pomeroy{at}childrens.harvard.edu PURPOSE: Stratification of risk in patients with medulloblastoma remains a challenge. As clinical parameters have been proven insufficient for accurately defining disease risk, molecular markers have become the focus of interest. Outcome predictions on the basis of microarray gene expression profiles have been the most accurate to date. We ask in a multivariate model whether clinical parameters enhance survival predictions of gene expression profiles. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a cohort of 55 young patients (whose medulloblastoma samples have been analyzed previously for gene expression profile), associations between clinical and gene expression variables and survival were assessed using Cox proportional hazards models. Available clinical variables included age, stage (ie, the presence of disseminated disease at diagnosis), sex, histologic subtype, treatment, and status. RESULTS: Univariate analysis demonstrated expression profiles to be the only significant clinical prognostic factor (P = .03). In multivariate analysis, gene expression profiles predicted outcome independent of other criteria. Clinical criteria did not significantly contribute additional information for outcome predictions, although an exploratory analysis noted a trend for decreased survival of patients with metastases at diagnosis but favorable gene expression profile. CONCLUSION: Gene expression profiling predicts medulloblastoma outcome independent of clinical variables. These results need to be validated in a larger prospective study. Supported in part by NIH grant No. NS35701, an NIH-supported Mental Retardation Research Center HD18655, and the Kyle Mullarkey Medulloblastoma Fund (S.L.P), the Fulbright Scholar Program, the Foundation of Spanish Society of Pediatric Oncology (SEOP), and a grant from the Department of Health of Basque Gouvernement (Spain) (A.F-T). Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.
Related Article
Related Editorial
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|