Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 22, No 7 (April 1), 2004: pp. 1253-1259
© 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.07.058
18F-2-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography in Staging of Locally Advanced Breast Cancer
Jacobus J.M. van der Hoeven,
Nanda C. Krak,
Otto S. Hoekstra,
Emile F.I. Comans,
Robert P.A. Boom ,
Dick van Geldere,
Sybren Meijer,
Elsken van der Wall,
Jan Buter,
Herbert M. Pinedo,
Gerrit J.J. Teule,
Adriaan A. Lammertsma
From the Departments of Nuclear Medicine and PET Research, Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatics, Surgery, and Medical Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam; and Departments of Surgery and Internal Medicine, Ziekenhuis Amstelveen, Amstelveen, the Netherlands.
Address reprint requests to J.J.M. van der Hoeven, MD, Vrije Universiteit University Medical Center, PET Center/Department of Nuclear Medicine, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, the Netherlands; e-mail: jjho{at}zha.nl
PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the effect of adding whole-body 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) to conventional screening for distant metastases in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: All women with LABC referred for participation in the LABC Spinoza trial were considered eligible for this study. Patients were included if chest x-ray, bone scan, liver ultrasound, or computed tomography scan performed by the referring physician failed to reveal distant metastases. They underwent whole-body FDG PET scanning before therapy. Patients with subsequently proven distant metastases were switched to alternative forms of chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, or both.
RESULTS: Among the 48 patients evaluated with PET, 14 had abnormal FDG uptake, and metastases were suspected in 12. After simple clinical evaluation (plain x-ray, history), 10 sites that were suggestive of abnormality remained. Further work-up revealed that four sites were metastases. Proven false positivity occurred in one patient with sarcoidosis. In the other five patients, the reason for abnormal FDG uptake (liver, lung, bone) remained unclear, and patients were treated as planned. Eleven months later, distant metastases were found in one patient at sites unrelated to the previous FDG uptake.
CONCLUSION: The addition of FDG PET to the standard work-up of patients with LABC may lead to the detection of unexpected distant metastases. This may contribute to a more realistic stratification between patients with true stage III breast cancer and those who are in fact suffering from stage IV disease. Abnormal PET findings should be confirmed to prevent patients from being denied appropriate treatment.
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.
Deceased.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. H. Lee, E. L. Rosen, and D. A. Mankoff
The Role of Radiotracer Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management of Patients with Breast Cancer: Part 2--Response to Therapy, Other Indications, and Future Directions
J. Nucl. Med.,
May 1, 2009;
50(5):
738 - 748.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. H. Lee, E. L. Rosen, and D. A. Mankoff
The Role of Radiotracer Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management of Patients with Breast Cancer: Part 1--Overview, Detection, and Staging
J. Nucl. Med.,
April 1, 2009;
50(4):
569 - 581.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Carkaci, H. A. Macapinlac, M. Cristofanilli, O. Mawlawi, E. Rohren, A. M. Gonzalez Angulo, S. Dawood, E. Resetkova, H. T. Le-Petross, and W.-T. Yang
Retrospective Study of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the Diagnosis of Inflammatory Breast Cancer: Preliminary Data
J. Nucl. Med.,
February 1, 2009;
50(2):
231 - 238.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Fuster, J. Duch, P. Paredes, M. Velasco, M. Munoz, G. Santamaria, M. Fontanillas, and F. Pons
Preoperative Staging of Large Primary Breast Cancer With [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Compared With Conventional Imaging Procedures
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 10, 2008;
26(29):
4746 - 4751.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Emmering, N. C. Krak, J. J. M. Van der Hoeven, M. D. Spreeuwenberg, J. W. R. Twisk, S. Meijer, H. M. Pinedo, and O. S. Hoekstra
Preoperative [18F] FDG-PET after chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer: prognostic value as compared with histopathology
Ann. Onc.,
September 1, 2008;
19(9):
1573 - 1577.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Mahner, S. Schirrmacher, W. Brenner, L. Jenicke, C. R. Habermann, N. Avril, and J. Dose-Schwarz
Comparison between positron emission tomography using 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose, conventional imaging and computed tomography for staging of breast cancer
Ann. Onc.,
July 1, 2008;
19(7):
1249 - 1254.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. C. Hodgson and K. Y. Gulenchyn
Is There a Role for Positron Emission Tomography in Breast Cancer Staging?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
February 10, 2008;
26(5):
712 - 720.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Chia, S. M. Swain, D. R. Byrd, and D. A. Mankoff
Locally Advanced and Inflammatory Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
February 10, 2008;
26(5):
786 - 790.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. A. Margolis, J. M. Hoffman, R. J. Herfkens, R. B. Jeffrey, A. Quon, and S. S. Gambhir
Molecular Imaging Techniques in Body Imaging
Radiology,
November 1, 2007;
245(2):
333 - 356.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B Klaeser, O Wiederkehr, D Koeberle, A Mueller, B Bubeck, and B Thuerlimann
Therapeutic impact of 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in the pre- and postoperative staging of patients with clinically intermediate or high-risk breast cancer
Ann. Onc.,
August 1, 2007;
18(8):
1329 - 1334.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A Cardillo, C De Cicco, G Paganelli, R Ghisini, G Peruzzotti, A Balduzzi, A Goldhirsch, N Rotmensz, P Veronesi, A Luini, et al.
Role of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the staging of patients with breast cancer candidated to surgery
Ann. Onc.,
February 1, 2007;
18(2):
394 - 395.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Chung, D. Liou, S. Karlan, A. Waxman, K. Fujimoto, M. Hagiike, and E. H. Phillips
Preoperative FDG-PET for Axillary Metastases in Patients With Breast Cancer
Arch Surg,
August 1, 2006;
141(8):
783 - 789.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. R. Port, H. Yeung, M. Gonen, L. Liberman, J. Caravelli, P. Borgen, and S. Larson
18F-2-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography Scanning Affects Surgical Management in Selected Patients With High-Risk, Operable Breast Carcinoma
Ann. Surg. Oncol.,
May 1, 2006;
13(5):
677 - 684.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. R. Port and H. S. Cody III
Editorial: Don't Give up your Gamma Probe
Ann. Surg. Oncol.,
September 1, 2004;
11(9):
813 - 814.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|