Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 22, No 9 (May 1), 2004: pp. 1614-1620
© 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.07.190
Clinical Relevance of Different Sequencing of Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil in Operable Breast Cancer
Gianni Bonadonna,
Milvia Zambetti,
Angela Moliterni,
Luca Gianni,
Pinuccia Valagussa
From the Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy.
Address reprint requests to Gianni Bonadonna, MD, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Via Venezian 1, 20133 Milano, Italy; e-mail: gianni.bonadonna{at}istitutotumori.mi.it
PURPOSE: To assess the clinical relevance of different sequences of doxorubicin (DOX) and cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) in patients with operable breast cancer at risk of disease relapse.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two randomized trials were activated in the early 1980s. The first study, in patients with one to three involved nodes, was intended to assess the effectiveness of intravenous (IV) CMF given every 3 weeks for 12 courses versus eight courses of the same CMF regimen followed by four courses of full-dose DOX (CMF DOX). The second study, in patients with more than three involved nodes, compared four courses of full-dose DOX sequentially followed by eight courses of IV CMF (DOX CMF) versus alternating two courses of the same CMF regimen with one course of DOX (CMF/DOX) for a total of 12 courses.
RESULTS: After a median observation of 210 months, no statistically significant difference was documented in the first study (relapse-free survival hazard rate [HR], 1.06; total survival HR, 1.03). In contrast, the delivery of DOX first, followed by CMF significantly reduced the risk of disease relapse (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.87; P = .0017) and death (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.95; P = .018) compared with the alternating regimen.
CONCLUSION: Anthracycline-containing regimens can further reduce the odds of relapse and death compared with CMF. However, the findings observed in our trials emphasize that the relative merits of anthracycline adjuvant programs also can depend on the modality of administration and must be assessed in properly designed trials in which the magnitude of the benefits can be weighed against potential risks.
Supported in part by Contract N01-CM-07338 with the Division of Cancer Treatment, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Gianni, L. Norton, N. Wolmark, T. M. Suter, G. Bonadonna, and G. N. Hortobagyi
Role of Anthracyclines in the Treatment of Early Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 1, 2009;
27(28):
4798 - 4808.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Untch, V. Mobus, W. Kuhn, B. R. Muck, C. Thomssen, I. Bauerfeind, N. Harbeck, C. Werner, A. Lebeau, A. Schneeweiss, et al.
Intensive Dose-Dense Compared With Conventionally Scheduled Preoperative Chemotherapy for High-Risk Primary Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 20, 2009;
27(18):
2938 - 2945.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Gianni, J. Baselga, W. Eiermann, V. G. Porta, V. Semiglazov, A. Lluch, M. Zambetti, D. Sabadell, G. Raab, A. L. Cussac, et al.
Phase III Trial Evaluating the Addition of Paclitaxel to Doxorubicin Followed by Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil, As Adjuvant or Primary Systemic Therapy: European Cooperative Trial in Operable Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 20, 2009;
27(15):
2474 - 2481.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Bonadonna, P. Valagussa, and U. Veronesi
Lessons From the Initial Adjuvant Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil Studies in Operable Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
January 20, 2008;
26(3):
342 - 344.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. J. Poole, H. M. Earl, L. Hiller, J. A. Dunn, S. Bathers, R. J. Grieve, D. A. Spooner, R. K. Agrawal, I. N. Fernando, A. M. Brunt, et al.
Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil as Adjuvant Therapy for Early Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med.,
November 2, 2006;
355(18):
1851 - 1862.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P. Monk, G. Phillips, R. Waite, J. Kuhn, L. J. Schaaf, G. A. Otterson, D. Guttridge, C. Rhoades, M. Shah, T. Criswell, et al.
Assessment of Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Blockade As an Intervention to Improve Tolerability of Dose-Intensive Chemotherapy in Cancer Patients
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 20, 2006;
24(12):
1852 - 1859.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Gianni, J. Baselga, W. Eiermann, V. Guillem Porta, V. Semiglazov, A. Lluch, M. Zambetti, D. Sabadell, G. Raab, A. Llombart Cussac, et al.
Feasibility and Tolerability of Sequential Doxorubicin/Paclitaxel Followed by Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil and Its Effects on Tumor Response as Preoperative Therapy
Clin. Cancer Res.,
December 15, 2005;
11(24):
8715 - 8721.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. N. Levine, K. I. Pritchard, V. H.C. Bramwell, L. E. Shepherd, D. Tu, and N. Paul
Randomized Trial Comparing Cyclophosphamide, Epirubicin, and Fluorouracil With Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil in Premenopausal Women With Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Update of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Trial MA5
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 1, 2005;
23(22):
5166 - 5170.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Norton
Conceptual and Practical Implications of Breast Tissue Geometry: Toward a More Effective, Less Toxic Therapy
Oncologist,
June 1, 2005;
10(6):
370 - 381.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Font, A. Murias, F. R. Garcia Arroyo, C. Martin, J. Areal, J. J. Sanchez, J. A. Santiago, M. Constenla, J. M. Saladie, and R. Rosell
Sequential mitoxantrone/prednisone followed by docetaxel/estramustine in patients with hormone refractory metastatic prostate cancer: results of a phase II study
Ann. Onc.,
March 1, 2005;
16(3):
419 - 424.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|