Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 22, No 9 (May 1), 2004: pp. 1614-1620
© 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.07.190

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bonadonna, G.
Right arrow Articles by Valagussa, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bonadonna, G.
Right arrow Articles by Valagussa, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Clinical Relevance of Different Sequencing of Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil in Operable Breast Cancer

Gianni Bonadonna, Milvia Zambetti, Angela Moliterni, Luca Gianni, Pinuccia Valagussa

From the Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy.

Address reprint requests to Gianni Bonadonna, MD, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Via Venezian 1, 20133 Milano, Italy; e-mail: gianni.bonadonna{at}istitutotumori.mi.it

PURPOSE: To assess the clinical relevance of different sequences of doxorubicin (DOX) and cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) in patients with operable breast cancer at risk of disease relapse.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two randomized trials were activated in the early 1980s. The first study, in patients with one to three involved nodes, was intended to assess the effectiveness of intravenous (IV) CMF given every 3 weeks for 12 courses versus eight courses of the same CMF regimen followed by four courses of full-dose DOX (CMF->DOX). The second study, in patients with more than three involved nodes, compared four courses of full-dose DOX sequentially followed by eight courses of IV CMF (DOX->CMF) versus alternating two courses of the same CMF regimen with one course of DOX (CMF/DOX) for a total of 12 courses.

RESULTS: After a median observation of 210 months, no statistically significant difference was documented in the first study (relapse-free survival hazard rate [HR], 1.06; total survival HR, 1.03). In contrast, the delivery of DOX first, followed by CMF significantly reduced the risk of disease relapse (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.87; P = .0017) and death (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.95; P = .018) compared with the alternating regimen.

CONCLUSION: Anthracycline-containing regimens can further reduce the odds of relapse and death compared with CMF. However, the findings observed in our trials emphasize that the relative merits of anthracycline adjuvant programs also can depend on the modality of administration and must be assessed in properly designed trials in which the magnitude of the benefits can be weighed against potential risks.

Supported in part by Contract N01-CM-07338 with the Division of Cancer Treatment, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
L. Gianni, L. Norton, N. Wolmark, T. M. Suter, G. Bonadonna, and G. N. Hortobagyi
Role of Anthracyclines in the Treatment of Early Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2009; 27(28): 4798 - 4808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Untch, V. Mobus, W. Kuhn, B. R. Muck, C. Thomssen, I. Bauerfeind, N. Harbeck, C. Werner, A. Lebeau, A. Schneeweiss, et al.
Intensive Dose-Dense Compared With Conventionally Scheduled Preoperative Chemotherapy for High-Risk Primary Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., June 20, 2009; 27(18): 2938 - 2945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. Gianni, J. Baselga, W. Eiermann, V. G. Porta, V. Semiglazov, A. Lluch, M. Zambetti, D. Sabadell, G. Raab, A. L. Cussac, et al.
Phase III Trial Evaluating the Addition of Paclitaxel to Doxorubicin Followed by Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil, As Adjuvant or Primary Systemic Therapy: European Cooperative Trial in Operable Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., May 20, 2009; 27(15): 2474 - 2481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
G. Bonadonna, P. Valagussa, and U. Veronesi
Lessons From the Initial Adjuvant Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil Studies in Operable Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., January 20, 2008; 26(3): 342 - 344.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
C. J. Poole, H. M. Earl, L. Hiller, J. A. Dunn, S. Bathers, R. J. Grieve, D. A. Spooner, R. K. Agrawal, I. N. Fernando, A. M. Brunt, et al.
Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil as Adjuvant Therapy for Early Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., November 2, 2006; 355(18): 1851 - 1862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. P. Monk, G. Phillips, R. Waite, J. Kuhn, L. J. Schaaf, G. A. Otterson, D. Guttridge, C. Rhoades, M. Shah, T. Criswell, et al.
Assessment of Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Blockade As an Intervention to Improve Tolerability of Dose-Intensive Chemotherapy in Cancer Patients
J. Clin. Oncol., April 20, 2006; 24(12): 1852 - 1859.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
L. Gianni, J. Baselga, W. Eiermann, V. Guillem Porta, V. Semiglazov, A. Lluch, M. Zambetti, D. Sabadell, G. Raab, A. Llombart Cussac, et al.
Feasibility and Tolerability of Sequential Doxorubicin/Paclitaxel Followed by Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil and Its Effects on Tumor Response as Preoperative Therapy
Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2005; 11(24): 8715 - 8721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. N. Levine, K. I. Pritchard, V. H.C. Bramwell, L. E. Shepherd, D. Tu, and N. Paul
Randomized Trial Comparing Cyclophosphamide, Epirubicin, and Fluorouracil With Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil in Premenopausal Women With Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Update of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Trial MA5
J. Clin. Oncol., August 1, 2005; 23(22): 5166 - 5170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
L. Norton
Conceptual and Practical Implications of Breast Tissue Geometry: Toward a More Effective, Less Toxic Therapy
Oncologist, June 1, 2005; 10(6): 370 - 381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
A. Font, A. Murias, F. R. Garcia Arroyo, C. Martin, J. Areal, J. J. Sanchez, J. A. Santiago, M. Constenla, J. M. Saladie, and R. Rosell
Sequential mitoxantrone/prednisone followed by docetaxel/estramustine in patients with hormone refractory metastatic prostate cancer: results of a phase II study
Ann. Onc., March 1, 2005; 16(3): 419 - 424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online