Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 23, No 1 (January 1), 2005: pp. 205-229
© 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.120

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Michael, M.
Right arrow Articles by Doherty, M.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Michael, M.
Right arrow Articles by Doherty, M.M.

REVIEW ARTICLE

Tumoral Drug Metabolism: Overview and Its Implications for Cancer Therapy

M. Michael, M.M. Doherty

From the Division of Haematology and Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, St Andrew’s Place, E Melbourne; Department of Pharmaceutics, Victorian College of Pharmacy, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Address reprint requests to M. Michael, Division of Haematology and Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 1, A’Beckett St, Victoria 8006, Australia; e-mail: Michael.Michael{at}petermac.org

Drug-metabolizing enzymes (DME) in tumors are capable of biotransforming a variety of xenobiotics, including antineoplastics, resulting in either their activation or detoxification. Many studies have reported the presence of DME in tumors; however, heterogenous detection methodology and patient cohorts have not generated consistent, firm data. Nevertheless, various gene therapy approaches and oral prodrugs have been devised, taking advantage of tumoral DME. With the need to target and individualize anticancer therapies, tumoral processes such as drug metabolism must be considered as both a potential mechanism of resistance to therapy and a potential means of achieving optimal therapy. This review discusses cytotoxic drug metabolism by tumors, through addressing the classes of the individual DME, their relevant substrates, and their distribution in specific malignancies. The limitations of preclinical models relative to the clinical setting and lack of data on the changes of DME with disease progression and host response will be discussed. The therapeutic implications of tumoral drug metabolism will be addressed—in particular, the role of DME in predicting therapeutic response, the activation of prodrugs, and the potential for modulation of their activity for gain are considered, with relevant clinical examples. The contribution of tumoral drug metabolism to cancer therapy can only be truly ascertained through large-scale prospective studies and supported by new technologies for tumor sampling and genetic analysis such as microarrays. Only then can efforts be concentrated in the design of better prodrugs or combination therapy to improve drug efficacy and individualize therapy.

Authors’ disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
L. Liu, H. Sun, W. Y. Valji, and K. S. Pang
Transporters, enzymes, and enalapril removal in a rat (CC531-induced) liver metastatic model
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): G1078 - G1088.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
U. Emmenegger, Y. Shaked, S. Man, G. Bocci, I. Spasojevic, G. Francia, A. Kouri, R. Coke, W. Cruz-Munoz, S. M. Ludeman, et al.
Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic study of chronic low-dose metronomic cyclophosphamide therapy in mice
Mol. Cancer Ther., August 1, 2007; 6(8): 2280 - 2289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
Y. Li, O. Mezei, and N. F. Shay
Human and Murine Hepatic Sterol-12-{alpha}-Hydroxylase and Other Xenobiotic Metabolism mRNA Are Upregulated by Soy Isoflavones
J. Nutr., July 1, 2007; 137(7): 1705 - 1712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Mol. Diagn.Home page
S. Matsukuma, M. Yoshihara, F. Kasai, A. Kato, A. Yoshida, M. Akaike, O. Kobayashi, H. Nakayama, Y. Sakuma, T. Yoshida, et al.
Rapid and Simple Detection of Hot Spot Point Mutations of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor, BRAF, and NRAS in Cancers Using the Loop-Hybrid Mobility Shift Assay
J. Mol. Diagn., September 1, 2006; 8(4): 504 - 512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. A. Rudek, M. Zhao, N. F. Smith, R. W. Robey, P. He, G. Hallur, S. Khan, M. Hidalgo, A. Jimeno, A. D. Colevas, et al.
In vitro and In vivo Clinical Pharmacology of Dimethyl Benzoylphenylurea, a Novel Oral Tubulin-Interactive Agent
Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2005; 11(23): 8503 - 8511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
T. F. Cloughesy, J. Kuhn, H. I. Robins, L. Abrey, P. Wen, K. Fink, F. S. Lieberman, M. Mehta, S. Chang, A. Yung, et al.
Phase I Trial of Tipifarnib in Patients With Recurrent Malignant Glioma Taking Enzyme-Inducing Antiepileptic Drugs: A North American Brain Tumor Consortium Study
J. Clin. Oncol., September 20, 2005; 23(27): 6647 - 6656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 Site Map

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online