This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Erratum (v23,p5851) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Save to my personal folders Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Warr, D. G. Articles by Skobieranda, F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Warr, D. G. Articles by Skobieranda, F. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

Efficacy and Tolerability of Aprepitant for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Patients With Breast Cancer After Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy

From the Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; St Elizabeth's Medical Center, Brighton, MA; New York Lung Cancer Alliance; Columbia University, New York, NY; University of Vermont, UHC Campus/St Joseph, Burlington, VT; Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Herlev, Denmark; California Cancer Care, Greenbrae, CA; Merck & Co Inc, West Point, PA

Address reprint requests to David G. Warr, MD, Princess Margaret Hospital, Medical Oncology, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2M9; e-mail: david.warr{at}uhn.on.ca

PURPOSE: This is the first study in which the NK₁-receptor antagonist, aprepitant (APR), was evaluated for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible breast cancer patients were naive to emetogenic chemotherapy and treated with cyclophosphamide ± doxorubicin or epirubicin. Patients were randomly assigned to either an aprepitant regimen (day 1, APR 125 mg, ondansetron (OND) 8 mg, and dexamethasone 12 mg before chemotherapy and OND 8 mg 8 hours later; days 2 through 3, APR 80 qd) or a control regimen (day 1, OND 8 mg and dexamethasone 20 mg before chemotherapy and OND 8 mg 8 hours later; days 2 through 3, OND 8 mg bid). Data on nausea, vomiting, and use of rescue medication were collected with a self-report diary. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients with complete response, defined as no vomiting and no use of rescue therapy, during 120 hours after initiation of chemotherapy in cycle 1. The secondary end point was the proportion of patients with an average item score higher than 6 of 7 on the Functional Living Index–Emesis questionnaire.

RESULTS: Of 866 patients randomized, 857 patients (99%) were assessable. Overall complete response was greater with the aprepitant regimen than with the control regimen (50.8% v 42.5%; P = .015). More patients in the aprepitant group reported minimal or no impact of CINV on daily life (63.5% v 55.6%; P = .019). Both treatments were generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSION: The aprepitant regimen was more effective than the control regimen for prevention of CINV in patients receiving both an anthracycline and cyclophosphamide.

Supported by Merck & Co Inc.

Presented in part at the 40th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Clinical Oncology, New Orleans, LA, June 6, 2004 (late-breaking abstract, oral presentation) and at the 16th International Symposium of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/The International Society of Oral Oncology, Miami Beach, FL, June 24, 2004 (poster).

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Herrstedt, W. Apornwirat, A. Shaharyar, Z. Aziz, F. Roila, S. Van Belle, M. W. Russo, J. Levin, S. Ranganathan, M. Guckert, et al. Phase III Trial of Casopitant, a Novel Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonist, for the Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Receiving Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy J. Clin. Oncol., November 10, 2009; 27(32): 5363 - 5369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. Gralla and H. Raftopoulos Progress in the Control of Chemotherapy-Induced Emesis: New Agents and New Studies J. Oncol. Pract, May 1, 2009; 5(3): 130 - 133. [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Shih, H. S. Wan, and A. Chan Clinical Predictors of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Ann. Pharmacother., March 1, 2009; 43(3): 444 - 452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. B Ibrahim, M. H Abidi, L. J Ayash, S. M Cronin, C. Cadotte, J. Mulawa, P. A Jacobson, D. W Smith, J. P Uberti, and D. J Edwards Effect of aprepitant on intravenous tacrolimus disposition in reduced intensity hematopoietic stem cell transplantation Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, September 1, 2008; 14(3): 113 - 121. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Naeim, S. M. Dy, K. A. Lorenz, H. Sanati, A. Walling, and S. M. Asch Evidence-Based Recommendations for Cancer Nausea and Vomiting J. Clin. Oncol., August 10, 2008; 26(23): 3903 - 3910. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Hesketh Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting N. Engl. J. Med., June 5, 2008; 358(23): 2482 - 2494. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Georgy, J. Neceskas, and S. Goodin Antiemetic care for patients with breast cancer: Focus on drug interactions and safety concerns Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., November 1, 2007; 64(21): 2227 - 2236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Jordan, C. Sippel, and H.-J. Schmoll Guidelines for Antiemetic Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Past, Present, and Future Recommendations Oncologist, September 1, 2007; 12(9): 1143 - 1150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Grunberg Antiemetic activity of corticosteroids in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy: dosing, efficacy, and tolerability analysis Ann. Onc., February 1, 2007; 18(2): 233 - 240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Bloechl-Daum, R. R. Deuson, P. Mavros, M. Hansen, and J. Herrstedt Delayed Nausea and Vomiting Continue to Reduce Patients' Quality of Life After Highly and Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy Despite Antiemetic Treatment J. Clin. Oncol., September 20, 2006; 24(27): 4472 - 4478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. X. Li, E. Pequignot, D. Panebianco, P. Lupinacci, A. Majumdar, L. Rosen, T. Ahmed, J. E. Royalty, T. H. Rushmore, M. G. Murphy, et al. Lack of Effect of Aprepitant on Hydrodolasetron Pharmacokinetics in CYP2D6 Extensive and Poor Metabolizers. J. Clin. Pharmacol., July 1, 2006; 46(7): 792 - 801. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. G. Kris, P. J. Hesketh, M. R. Somerfield, P. Feyer, R. Clark-Snow, J. M. Koeller, G. R. Morrow, L. W. Chinnery, M. J. Chesney, R. J. Gralla, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline for Antiemetics in Oncology: Update 2006 J. Clin. Oncol., June 20, 2006; 24(18): 2932 - 2947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				The Antiemetic Subcommittee of the Multinational A Prevention of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced emesis: results of the 2004 Perugia International Antiemetic Consensus Conference Ann. Onc., January 1, 2006; 17(1): 20 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]