Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 23, No 13 (May 1), 2005: pp. 3069-3073
© 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.00.372
Evaluation of Epothilone B Analog in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Phase II Study of the Phase II Consortium
Scott Okuno,
William J. Maples,
Michelle R. Mahoney,
Tom Fitch,
James Stewart,
Paula M. Fracasso,
Michael Kraut,
David S. Ettinger,
Fitzroy Dawkins,
Charles Erlichman
From the Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Division of Oncology, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Department of Hematology/Oncology, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Madison, WI; Howard University, Washington, DC; Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; Karmanos Cancer Institute at Wayne State University, Detroit, MI; and The Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Baltimore, MD
Address reprint requests to Scott H. Okuno, MD, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First St, Southwest, Medical Oncology, Rochester, MN 55905; e-mail: okuno.scott{at}mayo.edu
PURPOSE: Epothilones are a new class of nontaxane tubulin polymerization agents that have activity in taxane-resistant tumors. Epothilone B (BMS-247550) is a semisynthetic analog of the natural product epothilone B. This study was performed to determine the activity of BMS-247550 in patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) who had not received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable, advanced, or metastatic STS with no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease were treated with BMS-2457550 50 mg/m2 intravenously during 1 hour every 21 days. All responses were confirmed 4 weeks later.
RESULTS: Thirty-one patients (median age, 54 years; range, 19 to 78 years; 48% female) were entered onto the trial and were assessable for response. All but one patient had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 0% or 1%, and 39% had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy. Mean follow-up was 22 months, with a confirmed response rate of 6% (95% CI, 0% to 17%). Median time to progression was 4.5 months (95% CI, 1.9 to 8.3 months), and 1 year progression-free survival was 17% (95% CI, 8% to 38%). Median survival was 16.4 months, with a 1-year survival of 61% (95% CI, 46% to 81%). Toxicity was mainly hematologic, with eight of 31 (26%) patients experiencing grade 3 to 4 leukopenia; 15 of 31 patients (48%) experienced grade 3 to 4 neutropenia. The grade 3 to 4 nonhematologic toxicities included neuropathies (26%), myalgia (13%), and fatigue (10%).
CONCLUSION: BMS-247550 has limited activity against STSs when given in this dose and schedule. The clinical toxicity is similar to that of taxanes.
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Schmid, P. Kiewe, K. Possinger, A. Korfel, S. Lindemann, M. Giurescu, S. Reif, H. Wiesinger, E. Thiel, and D. Kuhnhardt
Phase I study of the novel, fully synthetic epothilone sagopilone (ZK-EPO) in patients with solid tumors
Ann. Onc.,
October 30, 2009;
(2009)
mdp491v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. B. Michaud
The Epothilones: How Pharmacology Relates to Clinical Utility
Ann. Pharmacother.,
July 1, 2009;
43(7):
1294 - 1309.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Rivera, J. Lee, and A. Davies
Clinical Development of Ixabepilone and Other Epothilones in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors
Oncologist,
December 1, 2008;
13(12):
1207 - 1223.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. Lee and S. M. Swain
The Epothilones: Translating from the Laboratory to the Clinic
Clin. Cancer Res.,
March 15, 2008;
14(6):
1618 - 1624.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. Lee, J. A. Low, E. Croarkin, R. Parks, A. W. Berman, N. Mannan, S. M. Steinberg, and S. M. Swain
Changes in Neurologic Function Tests May Predict Neurotoxicity Caused by Ixabepilone
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 1, 2006;
24(13):
2084 - 2091.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. de Jonge and J. Verweij
The Epothilone Dilemma
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 20, 2005;
23(36):
9048 - 9050.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|