|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 23, No 19 (July 1), 2005: pp. 4406-4413 © 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.487 Outcome of Cancer Patients Considered for Intensive Care Unit Admission: A Hospital-Wide Prospective StudyFrom the Saint Louis Teaching Hospital; Paris 7 University; Assistance PubliqueHôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France Address reprint requests to Guillaume Thiéry, Medical Intensive Care Unit, Saint Louis Teaching Hospital, 1 rue Claude Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France; e-mail: guillaume.thiery{at}sls.ap-hop-paris.fr PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of cancer patients considered for admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective, one-year hospital-wide study of all cancer and hematology patients, including bone marrow transplantation patients, for whom admission to the ICU was requested. RESULTS: Of the 206 patients considered for ICU admission, 105 patients (51%) were admitted. Of the 101 patients who were not admitted, 54 patients (26.2%) were considered too sick to benefit, and 47 patients (22.8%) were considered to be too well to benefit from the ICU. Of these 47 patients, 13 patients were admitted later. Survival rates after 30 and 180 days were significantly associated with admission status (P < .0001). Remission of the malignancy (odds ratio [OR], 3.37; 95% CI, 1.25 to 9.07) was independently associated with ICU admission, whereas poor chronic health status (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.74) and solid tumor (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.78) were associated with ICU refusal. In admitted patients, 30-day and 6-month survival rates were 54.3% and 32.4%, respectively. Of the patients considered too sick to benefit from ICU admission, 26% were alive on day 30 and 16.7% on day 180. Among patients considered too well to benefit, the 30-day survival rate was a worrisome 78.7%. Calibration of the Mortality Probability Model (the only score available at triage) was of limited value for predicting 30-day survival (area under the curve, 0.62). CONCLUSION: Both the excess mortality in too-well patients later admitted to the ICU and the relatively good survival in too-sick patients suggest the need for a broader admission policy. Supported by grants from the French Society for Critical Care Medicine and the Assistance PubliqueHôpitaux de Paris. Presented in part at the Congress of the French Society of Intensive Care (SRLF), January 2004. Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|