Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 23, No 22 (August 1), 2005: pp. 4975-4979
© 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.08.904

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by D'Amico, A. V.
Right arrow Articles by Catalona, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by D'Amico, A. V.
Right arrow Articles by Catalona, W. J.

Identifying Patients at Risk for Significant Versus Clinically Insignificant Postoperative Prostate-Specific Antigen Failure

Anthony V. D'Amico, Ming-Hui Chen, Kimberly A. Roehl, William J. Catalona

From the Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Statistics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT; Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; and Department of Urology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL

Address reprint requests to Anthony V. D'Amico, MD, PhD, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Department of Radiation Oncology L-2 Level, Boston, MA 02115; e-mail: adamico{at}lroc.harvard.edu

PURPOSE: We evaluated whether men at risk for significant versus clinically insignificant prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure after radical prostatectomy could be identified using information available at diagnosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective prostate cancer screening study that enrolled, diagnosed, and treated 1,011 men with radical prostatectomy at Barnes-Jewish Hospital (St Louis, MO) from January 1, 1989, to June 1, 2002, for localized prostate cancer formed the study cohort. Preoperative predictors of a postoperative PSA doubling time (DT) of less than 3 months and more than 12 months or no PSA failure were identified using logistic regression.

RESULTS: A preoperative PSA velocity more than 2.0 ng/mL/yr (P = .001) and biopsy Gleason score 7 (P = .006) or 8 to 10 (P = .003) were significantly associated with having a postoperative PSA DT less than 3 months. A PSA level less than 10 ng/mL (P = .005), a nonpalpable cancer (P = .001) with a Gleason score ≤ 6 (P = .0002), and a preoperative PSA increase that did not exceed 0.5 ng/mL/yr (P = .03) were significantly associated with a postoperative PSA DT of at least 12 months or no PSA failure. Most men with these preoperative characteristics and a postoperative PSA DT of 12 months or more had a persistent postoperative PSA level of at least 0.2 ng/mL that did not exceed 0.25 ng/mL after a median follow-up of 3.6 years.

CONCLUSION: A postoperative PSA DT less than 3 months is associated with a preoperative PSA velocity more than 2.0 ng/mL/yr and high-grade disease. Select men with a postoperative PSA DT more than 12 months may not require salvage radiation therapy.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
S. Tomioka, M. Shimbo, Y. Amiya, H. Nakatsu, S. Murakami, and J. Shimazaki
Outcome of Patients with Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer: Prognostic Significance of Prostate-Specific Antigen-Doubling Time and Nadir Prostate-Specific Antigen
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2008; 38(1): 36 - 42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
R. W. Veltri, M. C. Miller, S. Isharwal, C. Marlow, D. V. Makarov, and A. W. Partin
Prediction of Prostate-Specific Antigen Recurrence in Men with Long-term Follow-up Postprostatectomy Using Quantitative Nuclear Morphometry
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2008; 17(1): 102 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
S. S. Chang and M. B. Amin
Utilizing the Tumor-Node-Metastasis Staging for Prostate Cancer: The Sixth Edition, 2002
CA Cancer J Clin, January 1, 2008; 58(1): 54 - 59.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
F. Shimizu, A. Igarashi, T. Fukuda, Y. Kawachi, S. Minowada, Y. Ohashi, and M. Fujime
Decision Analyses in Consideration of Treatment Strategies for Patients with Biochemical Failure After Curative Therapy on Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer in the Prostate-Specific Antigen Era
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., October 22, 2007; (2007) hym105v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
F. Shimizu, S. Tanaka, Y. Matsuyama, T. Tominaga, Y. Ohashi, and M. Fujime
Efficiency of Ultrasensitive Prostate-specific Antigen Assay in Diagnosing Biochemical Failure After Radical Prostatectomy
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2007; 37(6): 446 - 451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. V. D'Amico, M. Loffredo, A. A. Renshaw, B. Loffredo, and M.-H. Chen
Six-Month Androgen Suppression Plus Radiation Therapy Compared With Radiation Therapy Alone for Men With Prostate Cancer and a Rapidly Increasing Pretreatment Prostate-Specific Antigen Level
J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2006; 24(25): 4190 - 4195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 Site Map

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online