This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Save to my personal folders Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gross, T. G. Articles by Lynch, J. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gross, T. G. Articles by Lynch, J. C. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

Low-Dose Chemotherapy for Epstein-Barr Virus–Positive Post-Transplantation Lymphoproliferative Disease in Children After Solid Organ Transplantation

From the Departments of Pediatrics, Pathology and Microbiology, Surgery, and Preventive and Societal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; Departments of Pediatrics and Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH; and Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Research Medical Center, Seattle, WA

Address reprint requests to Thomas G. Gross, MD, PhD, Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43205-2696; e-mail: tgross{at}chi.osu.edu

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of a low-dose chemotherapy regimen in children with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) –positive, post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) after organ transplantation who have experienced failure with front-line therapy for PTLD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients received cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m² intravenous for 1 day) and prednisone (2 mg/kg orally for 5 days) every 3 weeks for six cycles.

RESULTS: Thirty-six patients treated on study were assessable for analyses. Front-line therapies for PTLD before study entry included immune suppression reduction or withdrawal (n = 36), antiviral therapy (n = 33), surgical resection (n = 8), rituximab (n = 2), and interferon alfa (n = 1). Reasons for failure of front-line therapy included progressive disease (PD; n = 33) and persistent disease with concurrent allograft rejection (n = 3). Thirty patients (83%) had stage III to IV disease, 92% had extranodal disease, and 75% had three sites of disease. The overall response rate was 83% (75% complete response + 8% partial response). The relapse rate was 19%, with only one of five relapsed patients alive and disease-free. Four patients presented with fulminant, disseminated PTLD; only one of these four patients achieved a response, and all four died of PD. Two patients died of treatment-related toxicity. Three patients (8%) experienced allograft loss, but two of the three patients are alive and disease-free after a second transplantation. The 2-year overall, relapse-free, and failure-free (without PTLD and with functioning original allograft) survival rates were 73%, 69%, and 67%, respectively.

CONCLUSION: This low-dose chemotherapy regimen is effective for children with EBV-positive, nonfulminant PTLD who have experienced treatment failure with front-line therapy, and this study represents the largest series of PTLD patients treated prospectively with a uniform chemotherapy regimen.

Supported by Grant No. R03 CA 78204-01 (T.G.G.) from the National Cancer Institute and Grant No. 6605-01 from the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (T.C.G., J.C.L., and T.G.G.).

Presented in part at the 3rd Symposium on Immunodeficiencies and Malignancies, Berlin, Germany, February 7-9, 2001; the 44th Annual Meeting of the Society of Hematology, Philadelphia, PA, December 6-10, 2002; and the 1st International Conference on Childhood Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, New York, NY, April 10-12, 2003.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Carbone, A. Gloghini, and G. Dotti EBV-Associated Lymphoproliferative Disorders: Classification and Treatment Oncologist, May 1, 2008; 13(5): 577 - 585. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Sudan, E. A. Bacha, E. John, and A. Bartholomew What's New in Childhood Organ Transplantation Pediatr. Rev., December 1, 2007; 28(12): 439 - 453. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Maecker, T. Jack, M. Zimmermann, H. Abdul-Khaliq, M. Burdelski, A. Fuchs, P. Hoyer, S. Koepf, U. Kraemer, G. F. Laube, et al. CNS or Bone Marrow Involvement As Risk Factors for Poor Survival in Post-Transplantation Lymphoproliferative Disorders in Children After Solid Organ Transplantation J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2007; 25(31): 4902 - 4908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-J. Lee, M. S. Lam, and A. Rosenberg Role of Chemotherapy and Rituximab for Treatment of Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder in Solid Organ Transplantation Ann. Pharmacother., October 1, 2007; 41(10): 1648 - 1659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. R. Kincaid, L. S. Nield, R. S. Moore, and F. G. Keller Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disease: A Case Report and Review for the General Pediatrician Clinical Pediatrics, May 1, 2007; 46(4): 287 - 291. [Abstract] [PDF]