Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.099 on August 29 2005
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 23, No 28 (October 1), 2005: pp. 6908-6918
© 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Impact of Five Prophylactic Filgrastim Schedules on Hematologic Toxicity in Early Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide
Paola Papaldo,
Massimo Lopez,
Paolo Marolla,
Enrico Cortesi,
Mauro Antimi,
Edmondo Terzoli,
Patrizia Vici,
Carlo Barone,
Gianluigi Ferretti,
Serena Di Cosimo,
Paolo Carlini,
Cecilia Nisticò,
Francesca Conti,
Luigi Di Lauro,
Claudio Botti,
Franco Di Filippo,
Alessandra Fabi,
Diana Giannarelli,
Federico Calabresi
From the Departments of Medical Oncology and Surgery, Regina Elena Cancer Institute; Division of Medical Oncology, S. Andrea Hospital; Division of Medical Oncology, University "La Sapienza"; Division of Medical Oncology, S. Eugenio Hospital; and Division of Medical Oncology, Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy
Address reprint requests to Paola Papaldo, MD, Division of Medical Oncology "A," Regina Elena Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144 Rome, Italy; e-mail: p.papaldo{at}mclink.it
PURPOSE: To evaluate the comparative efficacy of varying intensity schedules of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) support in preventing febrile neutropenia in early breast cancer patients treated with relatively high-dose epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide (EC).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: From October 1991 to April 1994, 506 stage I and II breast cancer patients were randomly assigned to receive, in a factorial 2 x 2 design, epirubicin 120 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 every 21 days for 4 cycles ± lonidamine ± G-CSF. The following five consecutive G-CSF schedules were tested every 100 randomly assigned patients: (1) 480 µg/d subcutaneously days 8 to 14; (2) 480 µg/d days 8, 10, 12, and 14; (3) 300 µg/d days 8 to 14; (4) 300 µg/d days 8, 10, 12, and 14; and (5) 300 µg/d days 8 and 12.
RESULTS: All of the G-CSF schedules covered the neutrophil nadir time. Schedule 5 was equivalent to the daily schedules (schedules 1 and 3) and to the alternate day schedules (schedules 2 and 4) with respect to incidence of grade 3 and 4 neutropenia (P = .79 and P = .89, respectively), rate of fever episodes (P = .84 and P = .77, respectively), incidence of neutropenic fever (P = .74 and P = .56, respectively), need of antibiotics (P = .77 and P = .88, respectively), and percentage of delayed cycles (P = .43 and P = .42, respectively). G-CSF had no significant impact on the delivered dose-intensity compared with the nonG-CSF arms.
CONCLUSION: In the adjuvant setting, the frequency of prophylactic G-CSF administration during EC could be curtailed to only two administrations (days 8 and 12) without altering outcome. This nonrandomized trial design provides support for evaluating alternative, less intense G-CSF schedules for women with early breast cancer.
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
Related Editorial
- Acting on Imperfect Evidence: How Much Regret Are We Ready to Accept?
Benjamin Djulbegovic, Andrew Frohlich, and Charles L. Bennett
JCO 2005 23: 6822-6825
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. J. Ip, A. Lee-Ma, L. S. Troxell, and J. Chan
Low-dose filgrastim in patients with breast cancer treated with docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm.,
August 15, 2008;
65(16):
1552 - 1555.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. M. Kuderer, D. C. Dale, J. Crawford, and G. H. Lyman
Impact of Primary Prophylaxis With Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor on Febrile Neutropenia and Mortality in Adult Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review
J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 20, 2007;
25(21):
3158 - 3167.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G Ferretti and P Papaldo
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-associated complications and increase in leukocyte number
Ann. Onc.,
June 1, 2007;
18(6):
1118 - 1119.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Ferretti and P. Papaldo
Can the Addition of Prophylactic Filgrastim Be Considered Cost Effective in Early Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 10, 2006;
24(35):
5615 - 5616.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. J. Smith, J. Khatcheressian, and B. Hillner
In Reply
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 10, 2006;
24(35):
5616 - 5616.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Ferretti, M. Lopez, E. Terzoli, E. Cortesi, M. Antimi, P. Marolla, D. Giannarelli, F. Cognetti, and P. Papaldo
Myeloid Toxicity in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant Chemotherapy: What Is the Appropriate Use of Filgrastim?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 10, 2006;
24(35):
5618 - 5619.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. J. Smith, J. Khatcheressian, G. H. Lyman, H. Ozer, J. O. Armitage, L. Balducci, C. L. Bennett, S. B. Cantor, J. Crawford, S. J. Cross, et al.
2006 Update of Recommendations for the Use of White Blood Cell Growth Factors: An Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline
J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 1, 2006;
24(19):
3187 - 3205.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Papaldo, G. Ferretti, S. Di Cosimo, D. Giannarelli, P. Marolla, M. Lopez, E. Cortesi, M. Antimi, E. Terzoli, P. Carlini, et al.
Does Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Worsen Anemia in Early Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 1, 2006;
24(19):
3048 - 3055.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. Wolff, R. J. Jones, N. E. Davidson, S. C. Jeter, and V. Stearns
Myeloid Toxicity in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Pegfilgrastim Support
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 20, 2006;
24(15):
2392 - 2394.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Djulbegovic, A. Frohlich, and C. L. Bennett
Acting on Imperfect Evidence: How Much Regret Are We Ready to Accept?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 1, 2005;
23(28):
6822 - 6825.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|