Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2005.06.965 on September 12 2005

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 23, No 30 (October 20), 2005: pp. 7445-7453
© 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Erratum (v23,p9445)
Right arrow Erratum (v23,p9445)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Avril, N.
Right arrow Articles by Kuhn, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Avril, N.
Right arrow Articles by Kuhn, W.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Editorial

Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy by Sequential F-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Patients With Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer

Norbert Avril, Stefanie Sassen, Barbara Schmalfeldt, Joerg Naehrig, Stephan Rutke, Wolfgang A. Weber, Martin Werner, Henner Graeff, Markus Schwaiger, Walther Kuhn

From the Department of Nuclear Medicine, Pathology and Gynecology Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Medical and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Pathology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany

Address reprint requests to Norbert Avril, MD, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, West Smithfield (QE II), London, EC1A 7BE, United Kingdom; e-mail: n.e.avril{at}qmul.ac.uk

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate sequential F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) to predict patient outcome after the first and third cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced-stage (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages IIIC and IV) ovarian cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients received three cycles of carboplatin-based chemotherapy, followed by cytoreductive surgery. Quantitative FDG-PET of the abdomen and pelvis was acquired before treatment and after the first and third cycle of chemotherapy. Changes in tumoral FDG uptake, expressed as standardized uptake values (SUV), were compared with clinical and histopathologic response; overall survival served as a reference.

RESULTS: A significant correlation was observed between FDG-PET metabolic response after the first (P = .008) and third (P = .005) cycle of chemotherapy and overall survival. By using a threshold for decrease in SUV from baseline of 20% after the first cycle, median overall survival was 38.3 months in metabolic responders compared with 23.1 months in metabolic nonresponders. At a threshold of 55% decrease in SUV after the third cycle median overall survival was 38.9 months in metabolic responders compared with 19.7 months in nonresponders. There was no correlation between clinical response criteria (P = .7) or CA125 response criteria (P = .5) and overall survival. There was only a weak correlation (P = .09) between histopathologic response criteria and overall survival.

CONCLUSION: Sequential FDG-PET predicted patient outcome as early as after the first cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and was more accurate than clinical or histopathologic response criteria including changes in tumor marker CA125. FDG-PET appears to be a promising tool for early prediction of response to chemotherapy.

Supported by the Department of Nuclear Medicine, Pathology and Gynecology of the Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.


Related Editorial

  • Use of Positron Emission Tomography Scans in Ovarian Cancer: A Diagnostic Technique in Search of an Indication
    Maurie Markman
    JCO 2005 23: 7385-7387 [Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
M. R. Benz, V. Evilevitch, M. S. Allen-Auerbach, F. C. Eilber, M. E. Phelps, J. Czernin, and W. A. Weber
Treatment Monitoring by 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Sarcomas: Interobserver Variability of Quantitative Parameters in Treatment-Induced Changes in Histopathologically Responding and Nonresponding Tumors
J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2008; 49(7): 1038 - 1046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
S.-L. Song, J.-J. Liu, G. Huang, Z.-H. Wang, Y.-Y. Song, X.-G. Sun, and T. Chen
Changes in 18F-FDG Uptake Within Minutes After Chemotherapy in a Rabbit VX2 Tumor Model
J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2008; 49(2): 303 - 309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
V. Evilevitch, W. A. Weber, W. D. Tap, M. Allen-Auerbach, K. Chow, S. D. Nelson, F. R. Eilber, J. J. Eckardt, R. M. Elashoff, M. E. Phelps, et al.
Reduction of Glucose Metabolic Activity Is More Accurate than Change in Size at Predicting Histopathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in High-Grade Soft-Tissue Sarcomas
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2008; 14(3): 715 - 720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. J. A. Margolis, J. M. Hoffman, R. J. Herfkens, R. B. Jeffrey, A. Quon, and S. S. Gambhir
Molecular Imaging Techniques in Body Imaging
Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 333 - 356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
C. Nahmias, W. T. Hanna, L. M. Wahl, M. J. Long, K. F. Hubner, and D. W. Townsend
Time Course of Early Response to Chemotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with 18F-FDG PET/CT
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2007; 48(5): 744 - 751.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. Leyton, M. Lockley, J. L. Aerts, S. K. Baird, E. O. Aboagye, N. R. Lemoine, and I. A. McNeish
Quantifying the Activity of Adenoviral E1A CR2 Deletion Mutants Using Renilla Luciferase Bioluminescence and 3'-Deoxy-3'-[18F]Fluorothymidine Positron Emission Tomography Imaging.
Cancer Res., September 15, 2006; 66(18): 9178 - 9185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
K.-H. Lee, S.-H. Lee, D.-W. Kim, W. J. Kang, J.-K. Chung, S.-A. Im, T.-Y. Kim, Y. W. Kim, Y.-J. Bang, and D. S. Heo
High fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on positron emission tomography in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer on platinum-based combination chemotherapy.
Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2006; 12(14): 4232 - 4236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
W. A. Weber
Positron Emission Tomography As an Imaging Biomarker
J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2006; 24(20): 3282 - 3292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
R. Weissleder
Molecular imaging in cancer.
Science, May 26, 2006; 312(5777): 1168 - 1171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online