Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 23, No 30 (October 20), 2005: pp. 7491-7496
© 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.00.7138

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eisen, A.
Right arrow Articles by Narod, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eisen, A.
Right arrow Articles by Narod, S. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Breast Cancer Risk Following Bilateral Oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: An International Case-Control Study

Andrea Eisen, Jan Lubinski, Jan Klijn, Pal Moller, Henry T. Lynch, Kenneth Offit, Barbara Weber, Tim Rebbeck, Susan L. Neuhausen, Parviz Ghadirian, William D. Foulkes, Ruth Gershoni-Baruch, Eitan Friedman, Gadi Rennert, Teresa Wagner, Claudine Isaacs, Charmaine Kim-Sing, Peter Ainsworth, Ping Sun, Steven A. Narod

From the Toronto-Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada; Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center and Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Department of Cancer Genetics, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE; Clinical Genetics Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Departments of Medicine and Genetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA; Epidemiology Research Unit, CHUM Hôtel-Dieu, University of Montreal, and the Program in Cancer Genetics, Department of Oncology and Human Genetics, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada; Institute of Genetics, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, and the Oncogenetics Unit, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, and the CHS National Cancer Control Center, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel; Private Trust for Breast Health, Division of Senology, University of Vienna, Austria; Lombardi Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, and the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, and the Centre for Research in Women's Health, University of Toronto, ON, Canada

Address reprint requests to Steven A. Narod, Centre for Research in Women's Health, 790 Bay St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1N8; e-mail: steven.narod{at}sw.ca

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the extent of protection offered against breast cancer by prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and to determine to what extent risk reduction varies with age at oophorectomy, age at diagnosis, and time elapsed since surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 1,439 patients with breast cancer and 1,866 matched controls derived from a registry of BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. We estimated odds ratios (ORs) of breast cancer for having had a bilateral oophorectomy, using conditional logistic regression, matched for parity and for oral contraceptive use.

RESULTS: A previous history of oophorectomy was associated with a significant reduction in breast cancer risk of 56% for BRCA1 carriers (OR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.66) and of 46% for BRCA2 carriers (OR = 0.57; 95% CI, 0.28 to 1.15). The risk reduction was greater if the oophorectomy was performed before age 40 (OR = 0.36; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.64 for BRCA1 carriers) than after age 40 (OR = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.91). The protective effect was evident for 15 years post-oophorectomy (OR = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.57).

CONCLUSION: Oophorectomy is an effective means of reducing the risk of breast cancer in carriers of BRCA1 mutations. The data suggest oophorectomy is protective in BRCA2 carriers as well, but needs to be confirmed in other studies.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
M. Hickey, M. Ambekar, and I. Hammond
Should the ovaries be removed or retained at the time of hysterectomy for benign disease?
Hum. Reprod. Update, September 30, 2009; (2009) dmp037v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
M. Hickey, M. Peate, C.M. Saunders, and M. Friedlander
Breast cancer in young women and its impact on reproductive function
Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2009; 15(3): 323 - 339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. W. Gray, C. O'Grady, L. Karp, D. Smith, J. S. Schwartz, R. C. Hornik, and K. Armstrong
Risk Information Exposure and Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing for BRCA Mutations among Women with a Personal or Family History of Breast or Ovarian Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2009; 18(4): 1303 - 1311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. Recht
Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: Caveat Emptor
J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2009; 27(9): 1347 - 1349.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. J. Gorski, R. D. Kennedy, A. M. Hosey, and D. P. Harkin
The Complex Relationship between BRCA1 and ER{alpha} in Hereditary Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2009; 15(5): 1514 - 1518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Prevention ResearchHome page
J. E. Garber
BRCA1/2-Associated and Sporadic Breast Cancers: Fellow Travelers or Not?
Cancer Prevention Research, February 1, 2009; 2(2): 100 - 103.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
T. R. Rebbeck, N. D. Kauff, and S. M. Domchek
Meta-analysis of Risk Reduction Estimates Associated With Risk-Reducing Salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation Carriers
J Natl Cancer Inst, January 21, 2009; 101(2): 80 - 87.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
O. I. Olopade, T. A. Grushko, R. Nanda, and D. Huo
Advances in Breast Cancer: Pathways to Personalized Medicine
Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2008; 14(24): 7988 - 7999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
A. Eisen, J. Lubinski, J. Gronwald, P. Moller, H. T. Lynch, J. Klijn, C. Kim-Sing, S. L. Neuhausen, L. Gilbert, P. Ghadirian, et al.
Hormone Therapy and the Risk of Breast Cancer in BRCA1 Mutation Carriers
J Natl Cancer Inst, October 1, 2008; 100(19): 1361 - 1367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
R. T. Chlebowski and R. L. Prentice
Menopausal Hormone Therapy in BRCA1 Mutation Carriers: Uncertainty and Caution
J Natl Cancer Inst, October 1, 2008; 100(19): 1341 - 1343.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Mol. Diagn.Home page
D. C. Allain
Genetic Counseling and Testing for Common Hereditary Breast Cancer Syndromes: A Paper from the 2007 William Beaumont Hospital Symposium on Molecular Pathology
J. Mol. Diagn., September 1, 2008; 10(5): 383 - 395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
N. D. Kauff, S. M. Domchek, T. M. Friebel, M. E. Robson, J. Lee, J. E. Garber, C. Isaacs, D. G. Evans, H. Lynch, R. A. Eeles, et al.
Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy for the Prevention of BRCA1- and BRCA2-Associated Breast and Gynecologic Cancer: A Multicenter, Prospective Study
J. Clin. Oncol., March 10, 2008; 26(8): 1331 - 1337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. Huo and O. I. Olopade
Genetic Testing in Diverse Populations: Are Researchers Doing Enough to Get Out the Correct Message?
JAMA, December 26, 2007; 298(24): 2910 - 2911.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
K. Britt, A. Ashworth, and M. Smalley
Pregnancy and the risk of breast cancer
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2007; 14(4): 907 - 933.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
E. Antuofermo, M. A. Miller, S. Pirino, J. Xie, S. Badve, and S. I. Mohammed
Spontaneous Mammary Intraepithelial Lesions in Dogs A Model of Breast Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2007; 16(11): 2247 - 2256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. J. Callahan, C. P. Crum, F. Medeiros, D. W. Kindelberger, J. A. Elvin, J. E. Garber, C. M. Feltmate, R. S. Berkowitz, and M. G. Muto
Primary Fallopian Tube Malignancies in BRCA-Positive Women Undergoing Surgery for Ovarian Cancer Risk Reduction
J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2007; 25(25): 3985 - 3990.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. Robson and K. Offit
Management of an Inherited Predisposition to Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., July 12, 2007; 357(2): 154 - 162.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
N. D. Kauff and R. R. Barakat
Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy in Patients With Germline Mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2
J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2007; 25(20): 2921 - 2927.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br Med BullHome page
F. Eisinger
Prophylactic mastectomy: ethical issues
Br. Med. Bull., April 4, 2007; (2007) ldm003v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. Chang-Claude, N. Andrieu, M. Rookus, R. Brohet, A. C. Antoniou, S. Peock, R. Davidson, L. Izatt, T. Cole, C. Nogues, et al.
Age at Menarche and Menopause and Breast Cancer Risk in the International BRCA1/2 Carrier Cohort Study
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2007; 16(4): 740 - 746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
A. Finch, M. Beiner, J. Lubinski, H. T. Lynch, P. Moller, B. Rosen, J. Murphy, P. Ghadirian, E. Friedman, W. D. Foulkes, et al.
Salpingo-oophorectomy and the Risk of Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, and Peritoneal Cancers in Women With a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation
JAMA, July 12, 2006; 296(2): 185 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. J. Hall and O. I. Olopade
Disparities in Genetic Testing: Thinking Outside the BRCA Box
J. Clin. Oncol., May 10, 2006; 24(14): 2197 - 2203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
T. Walsh, S. Casadei, K. H. Coats, E. Swisher, S. M. Stray, J. Higgins, K. C. Roach, J. Mandell, M. K. Lee, S. Ciernikova, et al.
Spectrum of Mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and TP53 in Families at High Risk of Breast Cancer
JAMA, March 22, 2006; 295(12): 1379 - 1388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online