Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 23, No 30 (October 20), 2005: pp. 7546-7554
© 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.525

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Freedland, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kane, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Freedland, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kane, C. J.

Prostate Size and Risk of High-Grade, Advanced Prostate Cancer and Biochemical Progression After Radical Prostatectomy: A Search Database Study

Stephen J. Freedland, William B. Isaacs, Elizabeth A. Platz, Martha K. Terris, William J. Aronson, Christopher L. Amling, Joseph C. Presti, Jr, Christopher J. Kane

From the Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD; Department of Surgery, Veterans Administration Medical Center; Section of Urology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA; Urology Section, Department of Surgery, Veterans Administration, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System; Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, School of Medicine, Los Angeles; Department of Urology, San Diego Naval Hospital, San Diego; Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine; Urology Section, Department of Surgery, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Palo Alto; Urology Section, Department of Surgery, Veterans Administration Medical Center; Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA

Address reprint requests to Stephen J. Freedland, MD, James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287-2101; e-mail: sfreedl1{at}jhmi.edu

PURPOSE: Prostate growth and differentiation are under androgenic control, and prior studies suggested that tumors that develop in hypogonadal men are more aggressive. We examined whether prostate weight was associated with tumor grade, advanced disease, or risk of biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy (RP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated the association of prostate weight with pathologic tumor grade, positive surgical margins, extracapsular disease, and seminal vesicle invasion using logistic regression and with biochemical progression using Cox proportional hazards regression among 1,602 men treated with RP between 1988 and 2003 at five equal-access medical centers, which composed the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) Database.

RESULTS: In outcome prediction models including multiple predictor variables, it was found that the predictor variable of prostate weight was significantly inversely associated with the outcomes of high-grade disease, positive surgical margins, extracapsular extension (all P ≤ .004), and biochemical progression (comparing prostate weight < 20 v ≥ 100 g: relative risk = 8.43; 95% CI, 2.9 to 24.0; P < .001). Similar associations were seen between preoperative transrectal ultrasound–measured prostate volume and high-grade disease, positive surgical margins, extracapsular extension (all P ≤ .005), seminal vesicle invasion (P = .07), and biochemical progression (P = .06).

CONCLUSION: Men with smaller prostates had more high-grade cancers and more advanced disease and were at greater risk of progression after RP. These results suggest that prostate size may be an important prognostic variable that should be evaluated for use pre- and postoperatively to predict biochemical progression.

Supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, National Institutes of Health Grant No. R01CA100938 (W.J.A.), National Institutes of Health Specialized Programs of Research Excellence Grant No. P50 CA92131-01A1 (W.J.A.), the Georgia Cancer Coalition (M.K.T.), Center for Prostate Disease Research grant from the United States Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (C.L.A.), the Department of Defense, Prostate Cancer Research Program Grant No. PC030666 (S.J.F.), and the American Foundation for Urological Disease/American Urological Association Education and Research Scholarship Award (S.J.F.).

The views and opinions of and endorsements by the authors do not reflect those of the US Army or the Department of Defense.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
A. C. Ferrari, N. N. Stone, R. Kurek, E. Mulligan, R. McGregor, R. Stock, P. Unger, U. Tunn, A. Kaisary, M. Droller, et al.
Molecular Load of Pathologically Occult Metastases in Pelvic Lymph Nodes Is an Independent Prognostic Marker of Biochemical Failure After Localized Prostate Cancer Treatment
J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2006; 24(19): 3081 - 3088.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online