Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 23, No 30 (October 20), 2005: pp. 7646-7653
© 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.0024
Phase I Study of O6-Benzylguanine and Temozolomide Administered Daily for 5 Days to Pediatric Patients With Solid Tumors
Katherine E. Warren,
Alberta A. Aikin,
Madeleine Libucha,
Brigitte C. Widemann,
Elizabeth Fox,
Roger J. Packer,
Frank M. Balis
From the National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Address reprint requests to Katherine E. Warren, MD, National Cancer Institute Neuro-Oncology Branch, Building 82, Room 219, 9030 Old Georgetown Rd, Bethesda, MD 20892-8200; e-mail: warrenk{at}mail.nih.gov
PURPOSE: This pediatric phase I trial of O6-benzylguanine (O6BG) and temozolomide (TMZ) on a daily schedule for 5 days, every 28 days was performed to determine the maximum-tolerated dose of TMZ when given with a biologically active dose of O6BG and to define the toxicity profile of the combination in children with solid tumors.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients 21 years old with refractory solid tumors were eligible. O6BG was administered intravenously over 60 minutes daily for 5 days. TMZ was administered orally 30 minutes after completion of each O6BG infusion. Starting doses of O6BG and TMZ were 60 mg/m2/d and 28 mg/m2/d, respectively. O6BG was escalated to 90 and 120 mg/m2/d; TMZ was subsequently escalated to 40, 55, 75, and 100 mg/m2/d. Cycles were repeated every 28 days.
RESULTS: Forty-one patients were enrolled; 32 patients were assessable for toxicity. The combination of O6BG and TMZ was tolerable at TMZ doses less than half of the conventional dose of 200 mg/m2/d. Myelosuppression occurred sporadically at all dose levels and was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at 100 mg/m2/d of TMZ combined with 120 mg/m2/d O6BG. Nonhematologic toxicities were generally mild. Evidence of antitumor activity was observed at 120 mg/m2/d O6BG combined with TMZ doses of 55 mg/m2/d and above.
CONCLUSION: The recommended doses of O6BG administered with TMZ on a 5-day schedule in children are 120 mg/m2/d of O6BG and 75 mg/m2/d of TMZ. Evidence of activity was observed at these doses. Myelosuppression was the DLT.
Presented in part at the 8th Annual Meeting of the Society of Neuro-Oncology, Keystone, CO, November 13-16, 2003.
This manuscript represents original work performed at the National Cancer Institute.
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. M. Horton, G. Jenkins, D. Pati, L. Zhang, M. E. Dolan, A. Ribes-Zamora, A. A. Bertuch, S. M. Blaney, S. L. Delaney, M. Hegde, et al.
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor ABT-888 potentiates the cytotoxic activity of temozolomide in leukemia cells: influence of mismatch repair status and O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase activity
Mol. Cancer Ther.,
August 1, 2009;
8(8):
2232 - 2242.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Kim, E. Fox, K. Warren, S. M. Blaney, S. L. Berg, P. C. Adamson, M. Libucha, E. Byrley, F. M. Balis, and B. C. Widemann
Characteristics and Outcome of Pediatric Patients Enrolled in Phase I Oncology Trials
Oncologist,
June 1, 2008;
13(6):
679 - 689.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Nagane, K. Kobayashi, A. Ohnishi, S. Shimizu, and Y. Shiokawa
Prognostic Significance of O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase Protein Expression in Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma Treated with Temozolomide
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 21, 2007;
(2007)
hym132v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Broniscer, S. Gururangan, T. J. MacDonald, S. Goldman, R. J. Packer, C. F. Stewart, D. Wallace, M. K. Danks, H. S. Friedman, T. Y. Poussaint, et al.
Phase I Trial of Single-Dose Temozolomide and Continuous Administration of O6-Benzylguanine in Children with Brain Tumors: a Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium Report
Clin. Cancer Res.,
November 15, 2007;
13(22):
6712 - 6718.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. M. Wagner, R. E. McLendon, K. J. Yoon, B. D. Weiss, C. A. Billups, and M. K. Danks
Targeting Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase in the Treatment of Neuroblastoma
Clin. Cancer Res.,
September 15, 2007;
13(18):
5418 - 5425.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Yoshimoto, C. K. Augustine, J. S. Yoo, P. A. Zipfel, M. A. Selim, S. K. Pruitt, H. S. Friedman, F. Ali-Osman, and D. S. Tyler
Defining regional infusion treatment strategies for extremity melanoma: comparative analysis of melphalan and temozolomide as regional chemotherapeutic agents
Mol. Cancer Ther.,
May 1, 2007;
6(5):
1492 - 1500.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Gururangan, M. J. Fisher, J. C. Allen, J. E. Herndon II, J. A. Quinn, D. A. Reardon, J. J. Vredenburgh, A. Desjardins, P. C. Phillips, M. A. Watral, et al.
Temozolomide in Children with progressive low-grade glioma
Neuro-oncol,
April 1, 2007;
9(2):
161 - 168.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. H. Kushner, K. Kramer, S. Modak, and N.-K. V. Cheung
Irinotecan Plus Temozolomide for Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma
J. Clin. Oncol.,
November 20, 2006;
24(33):
5271 - 5276.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|