Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 23, No 30 (October 20), 2005: pp. 7721-7735
© 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.09.004
Biology of Progesterone Receptor Loss in Breast Cancer and Its Implications for Endocrine Therapy
Xiaojiang Cui,
Rachel Schiff,
Grazia Arpino,
C. Kent Osborne,
Adrian V. Lee
From the Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine; and the Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
Address reprint requests to Adrian V. Lee, PhD, Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030; e-mail: avlee{at}breastcenter.tmc.edu
The response to endocrine therapy in breast cancer correlates with estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status. ER-positive/PR-negative breast cancers respond less well to selective ER modulator (SERM) therapy than ER-positive/PR-positive tumors. The predictive value of PR has long been attributed to the dependence of PR expression on ER activity, with the absence of PR reflecting a nonfunctional ER and resistance to hormonal therapy. However, recent clinical and laboratory evidence suggests that ER-positive/PR-negative breast cancers may be specifically resistant to SERMs, whereas they may be less resistant to estrogen withdrawal therapy with aromatase inhibitors, which is a result inconsistent with the nonfunctional ER theory. Novel alternative molecular mechanisms potentially explaining SERM resistance in ER-positive/PR-negative tumors have been suggested by recent experimental indications that growth factors may downregulate PR levels. Thus, the absence of PR may not simply indicate a lack of ER activity, but rather may reflect hyperactive cross talk between ER and growth factor signaling pathways that downregulate PR even as they activate other ER functions. Therefore, ER-positive/PR-negative breast tumors might best be treated by completely blocking ER action via estrogen withdrawal with aromatase inhibitors, by targeted ER degradation, or by combined therapy targeting both ER and growth factor signaling pathways. In this review, we will discuss the biology and etiology of ER-positive/PR-negative breast cancer, highlighting recent data on molecular cross talk between ER and growth factor signaling pathways and demonstrating how PR might be a useful marker of these activities. Finally, we will consider the clinical implications of these observations.
Supported by National Institutes of Health grant Nos. CA94118 (A.V.L.), P50 CA58183 (C.K.O.), and P01 CA30195 (C.K.O.), and the Department of Defense Postdoctoral Fellowship Award DAMD17-01-1-0133 (X.C.).
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Lord, L. Bernstein, K. A. Johnson, K. E. Malone, J. A. McDonald, P. A. Marchbanks, M. S. Simon, B. L. Strom, M. F. Press, S. G. Folger, et al.
Breast Cancer Risk and Hormone Receptor Status in Older Women by Parity, Age of First Birth, and Breastfeeding: A Case-Control Study
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.,
July 1, 2008;
17(7):
1723 - 1730.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Masri, S. Phung, X. Wang, X. Wu, Y.-C. Yuan, L. Wagman, and S. Chen
Genome-Wide Analysis of Aromatase Inhibitor-Resistant, Tamoxifen-Resistant, and Long-Term Estrogen-Deprived Cells Reveals a Role for Estrogen Receptor
Cancer Res.,
June 15, 2008;
68(12):
4910 - 4918.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Arpino, L. Wiechmann, C. K. Osborne, and R. Schiff
Crosstalk between the Estrogen Receptor and the HER Tyrosine Kinase Receptor Family: Molecular Mechanism and Clinical Implications for Endocrine Therapy Resistance
Endocr. Rev.,
April 1, 2008;
29(2):
217 - 233.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Dhasarathy, M. Kajita, and P. A. Wade
The Transcription Factor Snail Mediates Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transitions by Repression of Estrogen Receptor-{alpha}
Mol. Endocrinol.,
December 1, 2007;
21(12):
2907 - 2918.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Badve, D. Turbin, M. A. Thorat, A. Morimiya, T. O. Nielsen, C. M. Perou, S. Dunn, D. G. Huntsman, and H. Nakshatri
FOXA1 Expression in Breast Cancer Correlation with Luminal Subtype A and Survival
Clin. Cancer Res.,
August 1, 2007;
13(15):
4415 - 4421.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. S. Touillaud, A. C. M. Thiebaut, A. Fournier, M. Niravong, M.-C. Boutron-Ruault, and F. Clavel-Chapelon
Dietary Lignan Intake and Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Risk by Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Status
J Natl Cancer Inst,
March 21, 2007;
99(6):
475 - 486.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Kennecke, I. Olivotto, C Speers, B Norris, S. Chia, C Bryce, and K. Gelmon
Late risk of relapse and mortality among postmenopausal women with estrogen responsive early breast cancer after 5 years of tamoxifen
Ann. Onc.,
January 1, 2007;
18(1):
45 - 51.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Bardia, L. C. Hartmann, C. M. Vachon, R. A. Vierkant, A. H. Wang, J. E. Olson, T. A. Sellers, and J. R. Cerhan
Recreational Physical Activity and Risk of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Based on Hormone Receptor Status
Arch Intern Med,
December 11, 2006;
166(22):
2478 - 2483.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. J. Filardo, C. T. Graeber, J. A. Quinn, M. B. Resnick, D. Giri, R. A. DeLellis, M. M. Steinhoff, and E. Sabo
Distribution of GPR30, a Seven Membrane-Spanning Estrogen Receptor, in Primary Breast Cancer and its Association with Clinicopathologic Determinants of Tumor Progression.
Clin. Cancer Res.,
November 1, 2006;
12(21):
6359 - 6366.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Gizard, R. Robillard, B. Gross, O. Barbier, F. Revillion, J.-P. Peyrat, G. Torpier, D. W. Hum, and B. Staels
TReP-132 Is a Novel Progesterone Receptor Coactivator Required for the Inhibition of Breast Cancer Cell Growth and Enhancement of Differentiation by Progesterone.
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
October 1, 2006;
26(20):
7632 - 7644.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Pietras
Biologic Basis of Sequential and Combination Therapies for Hormone-Responsive Breast Cancer
Oncologist,
July 1, 2006;
11(7):
704 - 717.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Neven, N. Pochet, M. Drijkoningen, F. Amant, F. De Smet, R. Paridaens, M.-R. Christiaens, and I. Vergote
Progesterone Receptor in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: The Association Between HER-2 and Lymph Node Involvement Is Age Related
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 1, 2006;
24(16):
2595 - 2595.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|