Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 23, No 30 (October 20), 2005: pp. 7721-7735
© 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.09.004

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cui, X.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, A. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cui, X.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, A. V.

BIOLOGY OF NEOPLASIA

Biology of Progesterone Receptor Loss in Breast Cancer and Its Implications for Endocrine Therapy

Xiaojiang Cui, Rachel Schiff, Grazia Arpino, C. Kent Osborne, Adrian V. Lee

From the Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine; and the Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX

Address reprint requests to Adrian V. Lee, PhD, Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030; e-mail: avlee{at}breastcenter.tmc.edu

The response to endocrine therapy in breast cancer correlates with estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status. ER-positive/PR-negative breast cancers respond less well to selective ER modulator (SERM) therapy than ER-positive/PR-positive tumors. The predictive value of PR has long been attributed to the dependence of PR expression on ER activity, with the absence of PR reflecting a nonfunctional ER and resistance to hormonal therapy. However, recent clinical and laboratory evidence suggests that ER-positive/PR-negative breast cancers may be specifically resistant to SERMs, whereas they may be less resistant to estrogen withdrawal therapy with aromatase inhibitors, which is a result inconsistent with the nonfunctional ER theory. Novel alternative molecular mechanisms potentially explaining SERM resistance in ER-positive/PR-negative tumors have been suggested by recent experimental indications that growth factors may downregulate PR levels. Thus, the absence of PR may not simply indicate a lack of ER activity, but rather may reflect hyperactive cross talk between ER and growth factor signaling pathways that downregulate PR even as they activate other ER functions. Therefore, ER-positive/PR-negative breast tumors might best be treated by completely blocking ER action via estrogen withdrawal with aromatase inhibitors, by targeted ER degradation, or by combined therapy targeting both ER and growth factor signaling pathways. In this review, we will discuss the biology and etiology of ER-positive/PR-negative breast cancer, highlighting recent data on molecular cross talk between ER and growth factor signaling pathways and demonstrating how PR might be a useful marker of these activities. Finally, we will consider the clinical implications of these observations.

Supported by National Institutes of Health grant Nos. CA94118 (A.V.L.), P50 CA58183 (C.K.O.), and P01 CA30195 (C.K.O.), and the Department of Defense Postdoctoral Fellowship Award DAMD17-01-1-0133 (X.C.).

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. J. Lord, L. Bernstein, K. A. Johnson, K. E. Malone, J. A. McDonald, P. A. Marchbanks, M. S. Simon, B. L. Strom, M. F. Press, S. G. Folger, et al.
Breast Cancer Risk and Hormone Receptor Status in Older Women by Parity, Age of First Birth, and Breastfeeding: A Case-Control Study
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2008; 17(7): 1723 - 1730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. Masri, S. Phung, X. Wang, X. Wu, Y.-C. Yuan, L. Wagman, and S. Chen
Genome-Wide Analysis of Aromatase Inhibitor-Resistant, Tamoxifen-Resistant, and Long-Term Estrogen-Deprived Cells Reveals a Role for Estrogen Receptor
Cancer Res., June 15, 2008; 68(12): 4910 - 4918.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
G. Arpino, L. Wiechmann, C. K. Osborne, and R. Schiff
Crosstalk between the Estrogen Receptor and the HER Tyrosine Kinase Receptor Family: Molecular Mechanism and Clinical Implications for Endocrine Therapy Resistance
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2008; 29(2): 217 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
A. Dhasarathy, M. Kajita, and P. A. Wade
The Transcription Factor Snail Mediates Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transitions by Repression of Estrogen Receptor-{alpha}
Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2007; 21(12): 2907 - 2918.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Badve, D. Turbin, M. A. Thorat, A. Morimiya, T. O. Nielsen, C. M. Perou, S. Dunn, D. G. Huntsman, and H. Nakshatri
FOXA1 Expression in Breast Cancer Correlation with Luminal Subtype A and Survival
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2007; 13(15): 4415 - 4421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
M. S. Touillaud, A. C. M. Thiebaut, A. Fournier, M. Niravong, M.-C. Boutron-Ruault, and F. Clavel-Chapelon
Dietary Lignan Intake and Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Risk by Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Status
J Natl Cancer Inst, March 21, 2007; 99(6): 475 - 486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
H. Kennecke, I. Olivotto, C Speers, B Norris, S. Chia, C Bryce, and K. Gelmon
Late risk of relapse and mortality among postmenopausal women with estrogen responsive early breast cancer after 5 years of tamoxifen
Ann. Onc., January 1, 2007; 18(1): 45 - 51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
A. Bardia, L. C. Hartmann, C. M. Vachon, R. A. Vierkant, A. H. Wang, J. E. Olson, T. A. Sellers, and J. R. Cerhan
Recreational Physical Activity and Risk of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Based on Hormone Receptor Status
Arch Intern Med, December 11, 2006; 166(22): 2478 - 2483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
E. J. Filardo, C. T. Graeber, J. A. Quinn, M. B. Resnick, D. Giri, R. A. DeLellis, M. M. Steinhoff, and E. Sabo
Distribution of GPR30, a Seven Membrane-Spanning Estrogen Receptor, in Primary Breast Cancer and its Association with Clinicopathologic Determinants of Tumor Progression.
Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2006; 12(21): 6359 - 6366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
F. Gizard, R. Robillard, B. Gross, O. Barbier, F. Revillion, J.-P. Peyrat, G. Torpier, D. W. Hum, and B. Staels
TReP-132 Is a Novel Progesterone Receptor Coactivator Required for the Inhibition of Breast Cancer Cell Growth and Enhancement of Differentiation by Progesterone.
Mol. Cell. Biol., October 1, 2006; 26(20): 7632 - 7644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
R. J. Pietras
Biologic Basis of Sequential and Combination Therapies for Hormone-Responsive Breast Cancer
Oncologist, July 1, 2006; 11(7): 704 - 717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
P. Neven, N. Pochet, M. Drijkoningen, F. Amant, F. De Smet, R. Paridaens, M.-R. Christiaens, and I. Vergote
Progesterone Receptor in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: The Association Between HER-2 and Lymph Node Involvement Is Age Related
J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2006; 24(16): 2595 - 2595.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online