Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 23, No 32 (November 10), 2005: pp. 8146-8151
© 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.9751
The Changing Face of Prostate Cancer
Matthew R. Cooperberg,
Judd W. Moul,
Peter R. Carroll
From the Department of Urology, Program in Urologic Oncology, Urologic Outcomes Research Group, UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA; and the Division of Urologic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
Address reprint requests to Peter R. Carroll, MD, UCSF Cancer Center, 1600 Divisadero St, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94115-1711; e-mail: pcarroll{at}urol.ucsf.edu.
Prostate cancer remains the most common noncutaneous human malignancy, and the second most lethal tumor among men. However, the natural history of the disease is often prolonged, and the survival benefits of local therapy for men with low-risk tumors may not be realized for a decade or more, as is increasingly well demonstrated in long-term observational cohorts in both the United States and Europe. A significant proportion of men with prostate cancer may be overdiagnosed, in the sense that diagnosis may not improve their lifespan or quality of life. However, the extent to which overdiagnosis represents a true problem relates to the consistency with which diagnosis leads invariably to active treatment. Prostate cancer is diagnosed at progressively earlier stages and with lower risk features; despite these trends, patients are less likely now than a decade ago to undergo a trial of active surveillance. Rates of brachytherapy and hormonal therapy use, in particular, have risen markedly. Important progress has been made in recent years in prostate cancer risk assessment. These advances, in combination with biomarkers in later stages of development, should be expected in the coming years to yield further improvements in clinicians' ability to diagnose prostate cancer early, and guide appropriately selected patients toward increasingly tailored treatment.
CaPSURE is supported by TAP Pharmaceutical Products Inc (Lake Forest, IL). Additionally funded by National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute University of California-San Francisco SPORE Special Program of Research Excellence p50 c89520.
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Guo, P. N. Werahera, R. Narayanan, L. Li, D. Kumar, E. D. Crawford, and J. S. Suri
Image Registration Accuracy of a 3-Dimensional Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy System
J. Ultrasound Med.,
November 1, 2009;
28(11):
1561 - 1568.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Kelly, P. Brader, A. Rein, J. P. Shah, R. J. Wong, Y. Fong, and Z. Gil
Attenuated multimutated herpes simplex virus-1 effectively treats prostate carcinomas with neural invasion while preserving nerve function
FASEB J,
June 1, 2008;
22(6):
1839 - 1848.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. S. Svatek, J. A. Karam, C. G. Roehrborn, P. I. Karakiewicz, K. M. Slawin, and S. F. Shariat
Preoperative Plasma Endoglin Levels Predict Biochemical Progression After Radical Prostatectomy
Clin. Cancer Res.,
June 1, 2008;
14(11):
3362 - 3366.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Katz and A. Katz
The top 13: What family physicians should know about prostate cancer
Can Fam Physician,
February 1, 2008;
54(2):
198 - 203.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Shimizu, A. Igarashi, T. Fukuda, Y. Kawachi, S. Minowada, Y. Ohashi, and M. Fujime
Decision Analyses in Consideration of Treatment Strategies for Patients with Biochemical Failure After Curative Therapy on Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer in the Prostate-Specific Antigen Era
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 22, 2007;
(2007)
hym105v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C-K. Chung, S. Zhou, L. Liao, J. C.-Y. Tien, N. M. Greenberg, and J. Xu
Genetic Ablation of the Amplified-in-Breast Cancer 1 Inhibits Spontaneous Prostate Cancer Progression in Mice
Cancer Res.,
June 15, 2007;
67(12):
5965 - 5975.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. E. Bailey Jr and M. Wallace
Critical Review: Is Watchful Waiting a Viable Management Option for Older Men With Prostate Cancer?
American Journal of Men's Health,
March 1, 2007;
1(1):
18 - 28.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Walczak and M. A. Carducci
Prostate Cancer: A Practical Approach to Current Management of Recurrent Disease
Mayo Clin. Proc.,
February 1, 2007;
82(2):
243 - 249.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. A. Tahir, A. Frolov, T. G. Hayes, M. P. Mims, B. J. Miles, S. P. Lerner, T. M. Wheeler, G. Ayala, T. C. Thompson, and D. Kadmon
Preoperative Serum Caveolin-1 as a Prognostic Marker for Recurrence in a Radical Prostatectomy Cohort.
Clin. Cancer Res.,
August 15, 2006;
12(16):
4872 - 4875.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. C. Farokhzad, J. Cheng, B. A. Teply, I. Sherifi, S. Jon, P. W. Kantoff, J. P. Richie, and R. Langer
Targeted nanoparticle-aptamer bioconjugates for cancer chemotherapy in vivo
PNAS,
April 18, 2006;
103(16):
6315 - 6320.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. J. Small and E. A. Klein
Challenges and Future Directions in the Prevention and Management of Prostate Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
November 10, 2005;
23(32):
8143 - 8145.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|