Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 23, No 32 (November 10), 2005: pp. 8161-8164
© 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.7987

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, I. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lippman, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, I. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lippman, S. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

REVIEW ARTICLE

Phase III Prostate Cancer Prevention Trials: Are the Costs Justified?

Ian M. Thompson, Catherine M. Tangen, Eric A. Klein, Scott M. Lippman

From the Department of Urology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio; Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Section of Urologic Oncology, Glickman Urological Institute; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH

Address reprint requests to Ian M. Thompson, MD, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229; e-mail: thompsoni{at}uthscsa.edu.

One randomized, prospective clinical trial for chemoprevention of prostate cancer has been completed, and two additional trials are ongoing. The investment, time, and effort for these trials are substantial. We reviewed the outcomes of these trials to address the value of the investment. The outcomes of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (testing finasteride) and the design of the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT; testing vitamin E and selenium) trial as well as the Reduction by Dutasteride of Prostate Cancer Events (REDUCE) trial (testing dutasteride) were reviewed. From a public health standpoint, there is tremendous potential for benefit from large-scale cancer prevention trials. Because of the volume of data that are collected, potential discoveries related to the biology of the disease are substantial. Translational scientific efforts are direct outgrowths of these studies. Prospective, randomized chemoprevention trials for prostate and other cancers are expensive and require long periods of time to conduct, yet the rewards are on a par with the investment.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin TrialsHome page
W. Demark-Wahnefried, S. L George, B. R Switzer, D. C Snyder, J. F Madden, T. J Polascik, M. T Ruffin IV, and R. T Vollmer
Overcoming challenges in designing and implementing a phase II randomized controlled trial using a presurgical model to test a dietary intervention in prostate cancer
Clinical Trials, June 1, 2008; 5(3): 262 - 272.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. Raina, M.-J. Blouin, R. P. Singh, N. Majeed, G. Deep, L. Varghese, L. M. Glode, N. M. Greenberg, D. Hwang, P. Cohen, et al.
Dietary Feeding of Silibinin Inhibits Prostate Tumor Growth and Progression in Transgenic Adenocarcinoma of the Mouse Prostate Model
Cancer Res., November 15, 2007; 67(22): 11083 - 11091.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
A. B Rajput, M. A Miller, A. De Luca, N. Boyd, S. Leung, A. Hurtado-Coll, L. Fazli, E. C Jones, J. B Palmer, M. E Gleave, et al.
Frequency of the TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion is increased in moderate to poorly differentiated prostate cancers
J. Clin. Pathol., November 1, 2007; 60(11): 1238 - 1243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
R. S. Svatek, J. J. Lee, C. G. Roehrborn, S. M. Lippman, and Y. Lotan
The cost of prostate cancer chemoprevention: a decision analysis model.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2006; 15(8): 1485 - 1489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. M. Lippman and J. J. Lee
Reducing the "Risk" of Chemoprevention: Defining and Targeting High Risk--2005 AACR Cancer Research and Prevention Foundation Award Lecture.
Cancer Res., March 15, 2006; 66(6): 2893 - 2903.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
E. J. Small and E. A. Klein
Challenges and Future Directions in the Prevention and Management of Prostate Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., November 10, 2005; 23(32): 8143 - 8145.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online